Özgür KAN, Ayşegül ALKILIÇ, Batuhan ÖZMEN

Robotik Cerrahi Teknolojisi, Geçmişten Geleceğe

Laparoskopinin cerrahi alanda kullanıma girmesiyle cerrahide büyük bir değişim meydana gelmiştir. Teknolojinin hızla ilerlemesi yenilikleri beraberinde getirmiş ve laparoskopinin dezavantajlarını, kendi avantajlarına çevirmiş robotik cerrahi teknolojisi gündeme gelmiştir. Bu ileri teknoloji şüphesiz gelişmeye devam edecek ve sağladığı faydaların yanında kimi eksiklikleri giderilerek daha sık kullanımı ile beraber belki de cerrahinin vazgeçilmez öğelerinden biri olacaktır.

Robotic Surgery Technology, From Past To Future

After using laparoscopy in the surgery field, big revolution happened in surgery. Rapid improvement in technology comes with innovations which used laparoscopy s disadvantages as its own advantages, robotic surgery comes to order. This technolgy will advance for sure by the time and some limitations will be solved, and by using it commonly, robotic surgery technology will become one of the indispensable entity of surgery

PDF

___

1. Nezhat CR, Burrell MO, Nezhat FR, Benigno BB, Welander CE. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with paraaortic and pelvic node dissection. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1992; 166:864-865.
2. Nezhat C, Hood J, Winer W, Nexhat F, Crowgey SR, Garrison CP. Videolaseroscopy and laser laparoscopy in gynaecology.Br J Hosp Med. 1987; 38:219-24.
3. Nezhat C, Nezhat F, Nezhat C. Operative laparoscopy. Videolaparoscopy and videolaseroscopy. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1994; 734:433-444.
4. Satava RM. Virtual reality, telesurgery, and the new world order of medicine. J Image Guid Surg. 1995; 1:12-6.
5. Schlag PM, Moesta KT, Rakovsky S, Graschew G. Telemedicine: the new must for surgery.Arch Surg. 1999; 134:1216-21.
6. Ballantyne GH. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring: review of early clinical results. Surg Endosc 2002; 10: 13891402.
7. Kavoussi LR, Moore RG, Adams JB, Partin AW. Comparison of Robotic Versus Human Laparoscopic Camera Control. J. Urol 1995; 154:2134-2136.
8. Stylopoulos N, Rattner D. Robotics and ergonomics. Surg Clin North Am 2003; 6:1321-1337.
9. Nezhat C, Saberi NS, Shahmohamady B, Nezhat F. Robotic-assisted laparoscopy in gynecological surgery. JSLS. 2006;10:317-20.
10. Farr Nezhat, Gazi Yıldırım. Jinekolojide Yeni Bir Çağın Başlangıcı: Robotik Cerrahi. 6. Ulusal Jinekoloji ve Obstetrik Kongresi. 14-19 Mayıs 2008-Belek, Antalya.
11. Datta MS, Yildirim G, Rahaman J, Hagopian G, Chuang L, Nezhat FR. Robotic Gynecologic Surgery in a Fellowship Training Program: An Initial Experience. The 36th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. November 13-17, 2007. Marriot Wardman Park, Washington DC, USA.
12. Corcione F, Esposito C, Cuccurullo D, Settembre A, Miranda M, Amato F, Pirozzi F, Caiazzo P. Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery. Preliminary experience Surg Endosc 2005; 19: 117-119.
13. Ferguson JL, Beste TM, Nelson KH, Daucher JA. Making the Transition From Standard Gynecologic Laparoscopy to Robotic Laparoscopy. JSLS 2004; 8:326-328.
14. Hubens G, Coveliers H, Balliu L, Ruppert M, Vaneerdeweg W. A performance study comparing manual and robotically assisted laparoscopic surgery using the da Vinci system. Surg Endosc 2003; 17:1595-9.
15. Sarle R, Tewari A, Shrivastava A, Peabody J, Menon M. Surgical robotics and laparoscopic training drills. J Endourol 2004;18:63-7.
16. Hanly EJ, Marohn MR, Bachman SL, Talamini MA, Hacker SO, Howard RS, et al. Multiservice laparoscopic surgical training using the da Vinci surgical system. Am J Surg 2004; 187:309 -15.
17. Guru KA, Kuvshinoff BW, Pavlov-Shapiro S, Bienko MB, Aftab MN, Brady WE, Mohler JL. Impact of robotics and laparoscopy on surgical skills: A comparative study. J Am Coll Surg. 2007; 204:96-101.
18. Margossian H, Garcia-Ruiz A, Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Attaran M, Miller JH, Gagner M. Robotically assisted laparoscopic tubal anastomosis in a porcine model: a pilot study. Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1998; 8:69-73.
19. Mettler L, Ibrahim M, Jonat W. One year of experience working with the aid of a robotic assistant (the voice-controlled optic holder AESOP) in gynaecological endoscopic surgery. Hum Reprod. 1998; 13:2748- 50.
20. Falcone T, Goldberg J, Garcia-Ruiz A, Margossian H, Stevens L. Full robotic assistance for laparoscopic tubal anastomosis: a case report. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 1999; 9:107-13.
21. Falcone T, Goldberg JM, Margossian H, Stevens L. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal anastomosis: a human pilot study. Fertil Steril 2000; 73:1040-2.
22. Margossian H, Falcone T.Robotically assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and adnexal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2001; 11:161-5.
23. Diaz-Arrastia C, Jurnalov C, Gomez G, Townsend C Jr. Laparoscopic hysterectomy using a computer-enhanced surgical robot. Surg Endosc. 2002; 16:1271-3.
24. Degueldre M, Vandromme J, Huong PT, Cadiere GB. Robotically assisted laparoscopic microsurgical tubal reanastomosis: a feasibility study. Fertil Steril 2000; 74:1020 -3.
25. DiMarco DS, Chow GK, Gettman MT, Elliott DS. Robot-assisted laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for treatment of vaginal vault prolapse. Urology 2004; 63:373-6.
26. Advincula AP, Song A, Burke W, Reynolds RK. Preliminary experience with robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 2004; 11:511- 8.
27. Dharia SP, Falcone T. Robotics in reproductive medicine.Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1-11.
28. Nezhat C, Lavie O, Lemyre M, Unal E, Nezhat CH, Nezhat F. Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in gynecology: scientific dream or reality? Fertil Steril. 2008; 23. 29. Field JB, Benoit MF, Dinh TA, Diaz-Arrastia C. Computer-enhanced robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology. Surg Endosc 2007;21: 244246.
30. Magrina JF. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2007;28:7782.
31. Yildirim G, Datta MS, Steiner N, Nezhat FR. Robotic Technique for Radical Hysterectomy and Bilateral Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Case Presentation. AAGL. The 36th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. November 13-17, 2007. Marriot Wardman Park, Washington DC, USA.
32. Datta MS, Yildirim G, Zakhazansky K, Nagaresheth N, Chuang L, Nezhat FR. Laparoscopic vs. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy: A Visual Comparison. AAGL. The 36th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. November 13-17, 2007. Marriot Wardman Park, Washington DC, USA.
33. Datta MS, Chuang L, Yildirim G, Zakhazansky K, Nezhat FR, Steiner N, Gretz H, Nagaresheth N, Rahaman J. A comparison of Total Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy and Pelvic Lymphadenectomy for Gynecologic Malignancy Treatment in a Fellowship Training Program. AAGL. The 36th Global Congress of Minimally Invasive Gynecology. November 13-17, 2007. Marriot Wardman Park, Washington DC, USA.
34. Boggess J. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: evolution of a new surgical paradigm. J Robotic Surg 2007; 1:3137.
35. Magrina JF, Kho RM, Weaver AL, Montero RP, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: comparison with laparoscopy and laparotomy. Gynecol On. 2008; 109:86-91.
36. Sereno S, Mutter D, Dallemagne B, Smith CD, Marescaux J. Telementoring for minimally invasive surgical training by wireless robot. Surg Innov. 2007; 14:184-91.