Farklı genotipten yumurtacı tavukların eşdeğer çevre koşullarında karşılaştırmalı verim özellikleri

Bu çalışma; Brown Nick, Isa Brown ve Tetra-SL yumurtacı hibritlerin eşdeğer çevre koşullarında büyüme ve üretim dönemi verim performanslarını incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Her bir genotipten 1600 adet günlük civciv altlıkh yer sisteminde büyütüldükten sonra 16. haftada tavuk başına 45 cm2 alan düşen apartman sistemi kafeslere nakledilmiş ve 72 haftalık yaşa kadar verimler incelenmiştir. Brown Nick, Isa Brown ve Tetra-SL hibritlerin 18. hafta ağırlıktan sırasıyla 1481, 1517 ve 1514 g; büyüme (0-18. hafta) dönemi ölüm oranları %2.81, 1.75 ve 1.50 (P

Comparative production prameters of different layer genotypes in the same rearing condition

This study was carried out to investigate the growing and production parameters of Brown Nick, Isa Brown and Tetra SL hybrids in the same rearing conditions. 1600 chicks from each genotype were used and they reared on litter system till 16th week. After 16 week age they are moved battery cages where for each pullet has 45 cm2 field, and their production were examined till 72 week. The weight of Brown Nick, Isa Brown and Tetra SL genotypes in 18 weeks of age were found 1481, 1517 and 1514 g, respectively. The mortality rate in growing period of above groups were found 2.81, 1.75 and 1.50% (P

___

  • Anonim (1980): Variety of egg laying stocks. Annual Report, Year Ended 30th September 1979, 51, West of Scotland Agricultural College,UK.
  • Bell, D. (1994): Exceptional layer flocks Worldwide. Poultry International, July, 24-28. 3.Dumanovski, F., Ljubicic, S. (1997): The contemporary use of two feed mixtures for layers. Krmiva., 39: 2, 59-67; 3.
  • Duncan, E. T., Appley, M. C, Hughes, B. O. (1992): Effect of perches in laying cages on welfare and production of hens. British Poultry Science, 33: 1, 25-35; 19.
  • Erensayın, C. (1992): Bilimsel-Teknik-Pratik Tavukçuluk. Cilt: 2, TDFO: 72, 137-149, Ankara.
  • Heil, G., Hartman, W. (1994): Combined Summaries of European Random Sample Egg Production Tests Completed in 1991 and 1992. Report of Working Group 3 (Poultry Breeding and Genetics) of the European Federation of WPSA Branches, World's Poultry Science Journal, 50: 2, 187-189; 6.
  • Hill, J. A. (1986): Egg production in alternative system. A review of recent in the UK, Research and Development in Agriculture, 3: 1, 13-18.
  • Hughes, B. O., Dun, D. (1986): A comparison of hens housed intensively in cages and outside on range. Zootechnica International, February, 44-46.
  • Horn, P. (1977): Interaction environment with genetic factors in poultry. Aktualne problemy aviarnej genetiky. II. Celostatne Sympozium, S Medzinarodnou Ucastou. BeastCD, 1973-1988, UD: 950615, AN:790142070.
  • Kjaer, J. B., Sorensen, P. (2002): Feater peching and cannibalism in free-range laying hens as affected by genotype, dieatary level of methionine+cystine, light intensity during rearing and age of first access to the range area. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Vol. 76, Issue I, 21-39.
  • Laanmyae, L., Piirsalu, M. (1993): Performance recording of fowls in Estonia. Ptitsevodstvo, No. 5, 14 15. BeastCD 1988-2001, UD: 950616, AN: 920101436.
  • Laanmyae, L., Piirsalu, M. (1991): Recording productivity of fowls in Estonia. Ptitsevodstvo, No. 10, 9- 11. BeastCD 1988-2001, UD: 95116, AN: 920101436.
  • Lewis, P. D., Perry, G. C, Morris, T. R. (1994): Effect of photoperiodically controlled age at first egg on egg production traits of two breeds of domestic hen. Proceedings 9th European Poultry Conference, Glaskow, UK, 7-12 August 1994, Volume 1, 145-146; 2.
  • Lewis, P. D., Perry, G. C, Morris, T. R. (1997): Responses of immature pullets to repeated cycles gradual increases and abrupt decreases in photoperiod. British Poultry Science, 38: 611-613; 5.
  • North, M., Bell, D. D. (1990): Commercial Chicken Production Manual. Fourth Edition, pp. 554.
  • Olhan, E. (1999): Türkiye'de tavukçuluk ve sözleşmeli üretim. Uluslararası Hayvancılık '99 Kongresi, 21 24 Eylül 1999, İzmir, 267-273.
  • Quemeneur, P., Menec, P. L., Protois, J., Bougan, M., Drovin, P., Lounay, P., Hanıelt, N., L'Hospitalier, R. (1987): Twenty-sixth laying tests (1985-1986). Animal Breeding Abstracts, Vol.: 55, No: 5.
  • Petek, M. (1999): Bursa il merkezine yakın çevre yumurtacı işletmelerde farklı genotiplerin üretim parametreleri ve ekonomik verimlilik. U.Ü. Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi, 18: 1-2, 65-77.
  • Satava, M., EI-Abiad, A. R. (1976): Comparing two types of laying hybrid: Efficiency and feed consumption.Agricultura Tropica et Subtropica, Universitas Agriculture, Praga, 9: 203-214; 8. BeastCD 1973-1988, UD: 950616, AN: 790142247.
  • Scholtyssek, S. (1971): Performance level of laying hens kept on different management intensities during the rearing and laying periods. Archiv für Geflügelkunde, 35: 4, 146-150. BeastCD 1973-1988, UD: 950616, AN: 740111977.
  • Sümbüloğlu, K., Sümbüloğlu, V. (1995): Biyoistatistik. 5. Baskı, Özdemir Yayıncılık, 48-111.
  • Tosovsky, J. (1977): The effect of genotype and supplier on the performance of fowls at large farms. Aktvalne problemy aviarnej genetiky. II. Celestatne Sympozium S Medmedzinarodnou Ucastou, 31-35. BeastCD 1973-1988, UD: 950616, AN: 790142072.
  • Van der Sluis, W. (1994): Ongoing improvements. World Poultry, Misset, Volume 10, 6, 10-17.
  • Zobac, P., Kumprecht, L, Jelinek, P., Doskocil, J., Suchy, P. (1996): Effect of digestive tract acidifying preparations on quantitative and qualitative indicators of egg production in laying hens. Zivocisna Vyroba,41: 9,407-412; 11. BeastCD 1989-2000/02, UD: 971116, AN: 971407581.
İstanbul Üniversitesi Veteriner Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 0250-2836
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 2 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınevi