ÖRGÜT YAPILARININ YENİLİKÇİLİK ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİLERİ: BANKACILIK SEKTÖRÜNDE KAVRAMSAL BİR MODEL TASARIMI

Amaç: Makalede, örgüt yapısını meydana getiren yapısal faktörlerin yenilikçiliğe olan bileşik etkilerine yönelikkuramsal bir modelin araştırılması amaçlanmıştır.Yöntem: Makaleye konu olan araştırma kapsamında; Türkiye bankacılık sektöründen üst düzey yöneticilerleyapılan görüşmeler, gözlemler ve bankalardan sağlanan veriler betimsel ve içerik analiziyle incelenmiştir.Bulgular: Kavramsal çerçeve kısmında oluşturulan ilişki modeli ile kodlamaya bağlı referans yoğunluğukullanılarak gerçekleştirilen araştırmanın pilot çalışma kısmındaki öncül sonuçlar “çevre, rekabet ve tekniksistem” durumsal faktörlerinin örgütlerin yenilikçiliğe bileşik etkisine işaret etmektedir. Yenilikçilik faktörleriiçerisinde ise “kurum kültürü ve üst yönetim desteği, bütçe ve kaynaklar, teknolojik araç ve süreçlerin”belirleyici olduğunu gösteren sonuçlar, örgütlerin inovasyon ekosistemi ile olan ilişkilerini meydana getirenunsurların yenilikçiliğe olan etkisine dikkat çekmektedir.Özgünlük: Araştırmanın ortaya koymuş olduğu inovasyon ekosistem modeli kullanılarak yapılacak ampirikçalışma ilgili alan yazına katkı sağlayacaktır. Ayrıca sektörel ölçekte gerçekleştirilecek inovasyon dönüşümü,reorganizasyon ve verimlilik uygulamalarında da çalışmanın sonuçları değerlendirilebilecektir.

EFFECTS OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURES ON INNOVATION: A CONCEPTIUAL DESIGN MODEL IN THE BANKING SECTOR

Purpose: In the article, it was aimed to investigate a theoretical model for the combined effects of structural factors on innovation in organizations. Method: Data obtained from the interviews with top executives in the Turkish banking sector, were examined by descriptive and content analysis in the context of the research. Findings: The preliminary results of relation model formed the conceptual framework and the reference intensity revealed a compound effect of the "environmental, competition and technical system" situational factors on innovativeness of the organizations. Among the innovation factors, the results also show that “corporate culture and senior management support, budget and resources, technological tools and processes” are determinant with the innovation ecosystem. Originality: The empirical study to be carried out using the innovation ecosystem model will contribute to the relevant literature. Furthermore, the results of the study can be evaluated in the innovational transformation, reorganization and efficiency practices at sectoral scale.

PDF

___

Annala, U. and Forsman, H. (2011). Small enterprises as innovators: The shift from a low performer to a high performer. International Journal of Technology Management, 56(2/3/4), 154-171.
Bailey, K. D. (1982). Methods of social research (2. baskı). New York: The Free Press.
Berg, B. L. and Lune. H. (2019). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. California: Pearson.
Budde, B., Alkemade, F. and Weber, M. (2012). Expectations as a key to understanding actor strategies in the field of fuel cell land hydrogen vehicles. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang, 79, 1072–1083.
Camison-Zornosa, C., Lapiedra-Alcami, R., Segarra-Cipres, M. and Boronat-Navarro, M. (2004). A metaanalysis of innovation and organizational size. Organization Studies SAGE, 25(3), 331-361.
Daft, R. (2006). Organization theory and design. Mason: South-Western Cengage Learning.
Damanpour, F. (1991). Organizational innovation: A meta-analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.
Damanpour, F. and Wischnevsky, D. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-generating from innovation-adopting organizations. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 23(4), 269–291.
Dewar, R. and Dutton, J. (1986). The adoption of radical and incremental innovations: An empirical analysis. Management Science, 31(11), 1422-1433.
Dougherty, D. and Hardy, C. (1996). Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: Overcoming innovation-to-organization problems. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120–1153.
Felin, T. and Powell, T. (2016). Designing organizations for dynamic capabilities. University of California, Berkeley, 58(4), 78-96.
Fores, B. and Camison, C. (2015). Does incremental and radical innovation performance depend on different types of knowledge accumulation capabilities and organizational size? Journal of Business Research Elsevier, 69(2), 831-848.
Forster, N. (1995). The analysis of company documentation: Qualitative methods in organizational research: A practical Guide. London: Sage.
Garcia-Zamora, E., Gonzalez-Benito, O. and Munoz-Gallego, P. (2013). Organizational and environmental factors as moderators of the relationship between multidimensional innovation and performance. Innovation: Management Policy & Practice, 15(2), 224-244.
Germain, R. (1996). The role of context and structure in radical and incremental logistics innovation adaption. Journal of Business Research, 35, 117-127.
Glaser, B. (1978). Theoretical sensitivity. San Francisco: University of California.
Gong, Y., Kim, T.-Y., Lee, D.-R. and Zhu, J. (2013). A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange and creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 56(3), 827–851.
Jansen, J., Van den Bosch, F. and Volberda, H. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation and performance: Effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52(11), 1661-1674.
Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechansim of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 59(1), 137-159.
Jensen, M., Johnson, B., Lorenz, E. and Lundva, B. (2007). Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation. Research Policy, 36(5), 680-693.
Khanna, R., Guler, I. and Nerkar, A. (2016). Fail often, fail big, and fail fast? Learning from small failures and R&D performance in the pharmaceutical industry. Academy of Management Journal, 59(2), 436-459.
King, N. and Anderson, N. (1995). Innovation and change in organizations. London: Cengage Learning.
Kocel, T. (2001). İşletme yöneticiliği. İstanbul: Beta Yayınları.
Laforet, S. (2013). Organizational innovation outcomes in SMEs: Effects of age, size and sector. Journal of World Business, 48(4), 490–502.
Lam, A. (2010). Innovative organizations: Structure, learning and adaptation. Madrid, Spain: BBVA.
LeCompte, M. D. and Goetz, J. P. (1982). Ethnographic data collection in evaluation research. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Fall 4(3), 387-400.
Levinthal, D. and March, J. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95-112.
Mehmood, K., Sonia, F. and Umar, A. (2016). Impact of organic structure on competitive performance of pharmaceutical companies in pakistan: Study of mediating roles. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS), 36(2), 821-834.
Micheli, P., Schoeman, M., Baxter, D. and Goffin, K. (2012). New business models for public-sector innovation: Successful technological innovation for government. Research-Technology Management, 55(5), 51-57.
Mintzberg, H. (1979). The structuring of organizations: Engle-wood cliffs. New York: Prentiergce‐Hall, inc.
Nisar, A., Palacios, M. and Grijalvo, M. (2016). Open organizational structures: A new framework for the energy industry. Journal Of Business Research, 69, 5175-5179.
Nooteboom, B., Haverbeke, V., Duysters, W., Gilsing, V. and Van den Oord, A. (2007). Optimal cognitive distance and absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 36, 1016–1034.
Oliveir, F. and Marzábal, O. R. (2019). Structural characteristics and organizational determinants as obstacles to innovation in small developing countries. Technological Forecasting And Social Change, 140, 306- 314.
Pavitt, K. (1990). What we know about the strategic management of technology. California Management Review, 23(3), 17-26.
Perrow, C. (1967). A framework for the comparative analysis of organizations. American Sociological Review, 32(2), 194-208.
Pierce, J. and Delbecq, A. (1977). Organization structure, individual attitudes and innovation. The Academy of Management Review, 2(1), 27-37.
Rhéaume, L. and Gardoni, M. (2015). Strategy-making for innovation management and the development of corporate universities. International Journal On Interactive Design And Manufacturing (IJIDeM), 10(1), 73-84.
Schilling, M. A. (2006). Strategic management of technological innovation. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.
Tidd, J., Bessant, J. and Pavitt, K. (1997). Integrating technological, market and organizational change: managing innovation. London: Wiley.
Tidd, J. and Bessant, J. (2009). Managing innovation. London: Wiley.
Tsai, K. and Wang, J. (2005). Does R&D performance decline with firm size? A reexamination in terms of elasticity. Research Policy, 34, 966–976.
Türkiye Bankalar Birliği. (2017). İstatistiki raporlar / banka, çalışan ve şube bilgileri raporu
Wolcott, H. F. (1994). Transforming qualitative data: Description, analysis and interpretation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Yıldırım, A. ve Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. İstanbul: Seçkin.