Müzakereci demokrasi ve sınırları

Bit makalede demokrasi teorisinde son zamanlarda baskın bir tema haline gelen "müzakereci demokrasi" eleştirel bir bakışla ele (ılınmaktadır. Özellikle, arka planında Habennas 'ııı "i lef iş imsel eylem " kuramı bulunan müzakereci demokrasi anlayışı açıklandıktan sonra, bu teorinin asitli ve epistemolojik öncüllerinden kaynaklanan sınırları üstünde odaklanılmakta-dır. Makale, müzakereci demokrasinin merkezi kavramı olan "kamusal müzakere "nin demokratik ideal açısından değerini takdir etmekle beraber, bit noktarıııı müzakereci demokrasivi başlı başına veya alternatif bir demokrasi teorisi olarak görmek için yeterli olmadığı vı ti guşayla sona ermektedir.

Deliberative democracy and its limits

This article presents a critical analysis of "deliberative democracy" which has recently been one of the dominant themes İn democratic ilieo/y. After giving an account of the deliberative democracy based on the J-Jabermasian concept of "communicative action" I focus on the limits of that concept due to its procedural and epistemological premises. The article concludes by emphasizing that though public deliberation as the pivotal concept of deliberative democracy has a privileged place in democratic ideal, this place does not give deliberative democracy a status of being an alternative theory of democracy.

PDF

___

Bell, Daniel A. (1999), "Democratic Deliberation: Tlıe Problem of Implementation", Macedo, Stephen (ed.), Deliberative Politics: Essays on Democracy and Disagreement (Oxford University Press) içinde, ss.70-87. "
Bellamy, Richard (2010), Political Constitutionalism: A Republican Defense of the Constitutionality of Democracy (Cambridge University Press, repr.).
Chambers, Simone (2003), "Deliberative Democratic Theory", Annual Review of Political Science, 6, ss. 307-326.
Erdoğan, Mustafa (2005), "Aydınlanma, Modernlik ve Liberalizm",
Demokrasi Platformu, n. 3, ss. 61-79 (Erdoğan, Mustafa, Aydınlanma, Modernlik ve Liberalizm [Ankara: Orion, 2006] içinde [ss. 15-40] yeniden yayımlandı)
Galston, William A. (1999), "Diversity, Toleration, and Deliberative Democracy: Religious Minorities and Public Schooling" Macedo (ed.), ibid, içinde, ss. 39-48.
Gaus, Gerald F. (2003), Contemporaty Theories of Liberalism: Public Reason as a Post- Enlightenment Project (Sage Publications).
Gutrnann, Amy (1996), "Democracy", Goodin, R. E. & Pettit, P. (eds.), A Companion to Contemporaty Political Philosophy (Blackwell) içinde, ss. 411-421.
Kukathas, Chandran (2006), "Moral Universalism and Cultural Difference", The Oxford Handbook of Political Theoty (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
Manin, B. (2001), "On Legitimacy and Political Deliberation", Blaug, R. & Schwarzmantel, J. (eds.), Democracy: A Reader (Edinburgh: Columbia University Press) içinde, ss. 501-508.
Pennnington, Mark (2010), "Democracy and the Deliberative Conceit", Critical Review, 22/2-3, ss. 159-184.
Pennington, Mark (2003), "Hayekian Political Economy and the Limits of Deliberative Democracy", Political Studies, 51/4, ss. 722-739.
Sanders, Lynn M. (1997), "Against Deliberation", Political Theoiy, Vol. 25, No. 3, ss. 347-75.
Shapiro, Ian (1999), "Enough of Deliberation: Politics is about Interests and Power", Macedo (ed.), ibid, içinde, ss. 28-38.
Tucker, Aviezer (2008), "Pre-emptive Democracy: Oligarchic Tendencies in Deliberative Democracy", Poltical Studies, 56/1, ss. 127-147.
Walzer, Michael (1999), "Deliberation, and What Else?", Macedo (ed.), ibid. içinde, ss. 58-69.