Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Girişimcilik Eğilimleri Üzerine Boylamsal Bir Araştırma

Amaç – Bu çalışmada, işletme bölümü lisans öğrencilerinin girişimcilik eğilimlerinin birinci ve dördüncü sınıfta farklılık gösterip göstermediğini tespit etmek amaçlanmıştır. Yöntem – Çalışma, nicel ve boylamsal bir çalışmadır. Bu kapsamda öğrencilerin girişimcilik eğilimlerini ölçmek için 2015 yılı Ekim ayında ve 2019 yılı Mayıs ayında anket tekniği ile veri toplanmıştır. Girişimcilik eğilimlerini ölçmek için Koh (1996) tarafından geliştirilen, İşcan ve Kaygın (2011) tarafından Türkçe diline geçerlenen ölçek kullanılmıştır. Ölçek, kendine güven, yenilikçilik, başarma ihtiyacı, içsel kontrol odağı, risk alma eğilimi ve belirsizliğe tolerans boyutlarından oluşmaktadır. Bulgular – Çalışmanın sonunda, öğrencilerin birinci ve dördüncü sınıftaki girişimcilik eğilimlerinin anlamlı farklılık göstermediği tespit edilmiştir. Ayrıca, öğrencilerin belirsizliğe karşı tolerans düzeylerinin olukça düşük olduğu belirlenmiştir. Tartışma – Öğrencilerin girişimcilik eğilimleri ekonomik koşullardan etkilenebilmektedir. Çalışmada aynı öğrenci grubundan farklı periyotlarda (2015 yılında ve 2019 yılında) veri toplanmıştır. Öğrencinin girişimcilik eğilimi veri toplanan dönemlerdeki ulusal veya uluslararası ekonomik koşullardan etkilenmiş olabilir. Ayrıca, araştırma verilerinin tek bir devlet üniversitesinin öğrencilerinden toplanması sonuçlar üzerinde etkili olabilir.

A Longitidunal Research on the Entreprenuership Inclination of University Students

Purpose – This study's aim is to investigate whether there is a significant difference between the entrepreneurship inclination of business students in their first year and fourth year. Design/methodology/approach – This article presents a quantitative and longitudinal study. In this context, data were collected with survey techniques in October 2015 and May 2019 to measure the entrepreneurial trends of students. The scale developed by Koh (1996) and validated in Turkish by İşcan and Kaygın (2011) was used to measure entrepreneurial inclination. The scale consists of self-confidence, innovativeness, need to achieve, intrinsic control focus, tendency to take risks, and tolerance to uncertainty dimensions. Findings – In the study's conclusion, the students do not exhibit a significant difference between entrepreneurship inclination of business students in their first year and fourth year. Moreover, the student's tolerance for ambiguity is very low. Discussion – The students' entrepreneurial inclinations can be affected by economic conditions. In the study, data were collected from the same group of students in different periods (in 2015 and 2019). The student's entrepreneurial inclinations may have been affected by national or international economic conditions during which data was collected. In addition, the collection of research data from students of a single public university can impact results.

___

  • Altinay, L., Madanoglu, M., Daniele, R. ve Lashley, C. (2012). The influence of family tradition and psychological traits on entrepreneurial intention. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 31(2), 489-499.
  • Balaban, Ö. ve Özdemir, Y. (2008). Girişimcilik Eğitiminin Girişimcilik Eğilimi Üzerindeki Etkisi: Sakarya Üniversitesi İİBF Örneği, Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 3(2), 133-148.
  • Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(1), 107- 117.
  • Bolton, D. L. ve Lane, M. D. (2012). Individual entrepreneurial orientation: Development of a measurement instrument. Education+ Training, 54(2/3), 219-233.
  • Boubker, O., Arroud, M. ve Ouajdouni, A. (2021). Entrepreneurship education versus management students' entrepreneurial intentions. A PLS-SEM approach. The International Journal of Management Education, 19(1).
  • Brockhaus Sr, R. H. (1980). Risk taking propensity of entrepreneurs. Academy of Management Journal, 23(3), 509- 520.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., Demirel, F. (2014). Bilimsel Araştırma Yöntemleri, (16. Baskı), Ankara, Pegem Akademi.
  • Carraher, S. M., Buchanan, J. K. ve Puia, G. (2010). Entrepreneurial need for achievement in China, Latvia, and the USA. Baltic Journal of Management, 5(3), 378-396.
  • Casson, M. (1982). The entrepreneur: An economic theory. (İkinci Baskı) London, Rowman ve Littlefield.
  • Chen, C. C., Greene, P. G. ve Crick, A. (1998). Does entrepreneurial self-efficacy distinguish entrepreneurs from managers?. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 295-316.
  • Collins, C.J., Hanges, P.J. ve Locke, E.A. (2004). The relationship of achievement motivation to entrepreneurial behavior: A meta-analysis. Human Performance, 17(1), 95-117.
  • Cromie, S., (2000). Assessing Entrepreneurial Inclinations: Some Approaches Empirical Evidence, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, (9)1, 13-30.
  • Do, B.R. ve Dadvari, A. (2017). The influence of the dark triad on the relationship between entrepreneurial attitude orientation and entrepreneurial intention: A study among students in Taiwan University. Asia Pacific Management Review, 22:185-191.
  • Doğaner, M. ve Altunoğlu, A. E. (2010). Adnan menderes üniversitesi Nazilli iktisadi ve idari bilimler fakültesi işletme bölümü öğrencilerinin girişimcilik eğilimleri. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 2(2), 103- 110.
  • Durak, İ., İrmiş, A. ve Özdemir, L. (2017). Girişimcilik Anadolu Kent Girişimciliğinden Örnekler, Bursa, Ekin Basım Yayın Dağıtım.
  • Erdem, F. (2001). Girişimcilerde Risk Alma Eğilimi ve Belirsizliğe Tolerans İlişkisine Kültürel Yaklaşım, Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 43-61.
  • Eroğlu, F., Sarıkaya, M. ve Eroğlu, Ş. G. (2016). Postmodern Kültür Bağlamında Kuşaklararası Girişimcilik Olgusu ve Davranış Tutarsızlığı Üzerine Bir Araştırma, International Conference on Eurasian Economies, 2016 Bildiri Kitabı, Macaristan, 150-159.
  • Fallows, J. (1985). The case against credentialism. The Atlantic Monthly, December, 49-67.
  • Gürel, E., Altınay, L. ve Danele, R. (2010). Tourism students' entrepreneurial intentions. Annals of Tourism Research, 37(3), 646-669.
  • Gürol, Y. ve Atsan, N. (2006). Entrepreneurial characteristics amongst university students: Some insights for entrepreneurship education and training in Turkey. Education+ Training, 48(1), 25-38.
  • Hall, J.K., Daneke, G. A. ve Lenox, M.J. (2010). Sustainable development and entrepreneurship: Past contributions and future directions. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(5), 439-448.
  • Harris, M. L., Gibson, S. G. ve Taylor, S. R. (2007). Examining the impact of small business institute participation on entrepreneurial attitudes. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 18(2), 57-76.
  • Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture's consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations. London, Sage Publications Inc.
  • European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/ Erişim Tarihi: 29.09.2019
  • Huang, S. K. ve Wang, Y. L. (2011). Entrepreneurial orientation, learning orientation, and innovation in small and medium enterprises. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 563-570.
  • İşcan, Ö. F. ve Kaygın, E. (2011). Potansiyel girişimciler olarak üniversite öğrencilerinin girişimcilik eğilimlerini belirlemeye yönelik bir araştırma. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 275-286.
  • Jung, D. I., Ehrlich, S. B., De Noble, A. F. ve Baik, K. B. (2001). Entrepreneurial self-efficacy and its relationship to entrepreneurial action: A comparative study between the US and Korea. Management International, 6(1), 41-53.
  • Kickul, J., Wilson, F., Marlino, D. ve Barbosa, S. D. (2008). Are misalignments of perceptions and self‐efficacy causing gender gaps in entrepreneurial intentions among our nation's teens?. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development. 15(2), 321-335.
  • Kirby, D. A. (2005). Entrepreneurship education: Can business schools meet the challenge. In Proceedings of the 2005 San Francisco-Silicon Valley Global Entrepreneurship Research Conference, USA, pp. 173–193.
  • Kirzner, I. M. (2009). The alert and creative entrepreneur: A clarification. Small Business Economics, 32(2), 145- 152.
  • Kline, S. J. ve Rosenberg, N. (2010). An overview of innovation. İçinde: Studies on Science and the Innovation Process: Selected Works of Nathan Rosenberg (pp. 173-203).
  • Koh, H. C. (1996). Testing hypotheses of entrepreneurial characteristics: A study of Hong Kong MBA students. Journal of managerial Psychology, 11(3), 12-25.
  • Kroeck, K. G., Bullough, A. M. ve Reynolds, P. D. (2010). Entrepreneurship and differences in locus of control. Journal of Applied Management and Entrepreneurship, 15(1), 21-49.
  • Krueger, N. F. ve Carsrud, A. L. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behavior. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 5(4): 315-330.
  • Landqvist, H. ve Stålhandske, P. (2011). Risk propensity of entrepreneurs-A study of underlying factors in background and personality in comparison with managers. University of Gothenburg, Management ve Organisation 11:64.
  • Levenburg, N. M. ve Schwarz, T. V. (2008). Entrepreneurial orientation among the youth of India: The impact of culture, education and environment. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 17(1), 15-35.
  • Low, M.B. ve MacMillan, I.C. (1988). Entrepreneurship: Past research and future challenges. Journal of Management, 14(2), 139-161.
  • Lumpkin, G. T. ve Erdogan, B. (2004). If not entrepreneurship, can psychological characteristics predict entrepreneurial orientation? A pilot study. The ICFAI Journal of Entrepreneurship Development, 1(1), 21- 33.
  • Matlay, H. (2008). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial outcomes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 15(2), 382-396.
  • Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F. ve Covin, J. G. (2010). Corporate entrepreneurship ve innovation. USA, (Third Edition), South-Western Cengage Learning.
  • Obschonka, M., Silbereisen, R. K., & Schmitt-Rodermund, E. (2010). Entrepreneurial intention as developmental outcome. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 77(1), 63-72.
  • Oosterbeek, H., Van Praag, M. ve Ijsselstein, A. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurship skills and motivation. European Economic Review, 54(3), 442-454.
  • Özkoç, H., Marangoz, M. ve Aydın, A. E. (2018). Öğrencilerin Kariyer Alternatiflerini Etkileyen Faktörler ve Girişimcilik Eğitimi. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 4(1), 98-119.
  • Packham, G., Jones, P., Miller, C., Pickernell, D. ve Thomas, B. (2010). Attitudes towards entrepreneurship education: a comparative analysis. Education + Training, 52(8/9), 568-586.
  • Peterman, N. E. ve Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise education: Influencing students' perceptions of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), 129-144.
  • Peters, N. (2002). Mixed embeddedness: Does it really explain immigrant enterprise in Western Australia?. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour and Research, 8(1/2): 32-53.
  • Raposo, M. ve Do Paço, A. (2011). Entrepreneurship education: Relationship between education and entrepreneurial activity. Psicothema, 23(3), 453-457.
  • Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T. ve Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: An assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(3), 761-787.
  • Robinson, P. B., Stimpson, D. V., Huefner, J. C. ve Hunt, H. K. (1991). An attitude approach to the prediction of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(4), 13-32.
  • Ronstadt, R. (1985). The educated entrepreneurs: A new era of entrepreneurial education is beginning. American Journal of Small Business, Summer, 7-23.
  • Ronstadt, R. (1984). Entrepreneurship: Text, Cases and Notes. Dover, MA: Lord.
  • Rotter, J. B. (1990). Internal versus external control of reinforcement: A case history of a variable. American Psychologist, 45(4), 489-493.
  • Seçgin, Y. (2020). Girişimcilik Eğitiminin Girişimcilik Eğilimi Üzerine Etkisi: Üniversite Öğrencileri Üzerine Bir Araştırma. Business & Management Studies: An International Journal, 8(1): 803-827.
  • Segal, G., Borgia, D. ve Schoenfeld, J. (2005). The motivation to become an entrepreneur. International journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior ve Research, 11(1), 42-57.
  • Shane, S., Locke, E. A. ve Collins, C. J. (2003). Entrepreneurial motivation. Human Resource Management Review, 13(2), 257-279.
  • Simon, M., Houghton, S. M. ve Aquino, K. (2000). Cognitive biases, risk perception, and venture formation: How individuals decide to start companies. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(2), 113-134.
  • Sitkin, S. B. ve Pablo, A. L. (1992). Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior. Academy of Management Review, 17(1), 9-38.
  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S. ve Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566-591.
  • Szirmai, A., Naudé, W. ve Goedhuys, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship, innovation, and economic development. İçinde: Entrepreneurship, Innovation, and Economic Development: An Overview, A.
  • Szirmai, W. Naud, M. Goedhuys (Der), Oxford University Press. (ss.3-32)
  • Tağraf, H. ve Halis, M. (2008). Üniversitelerdeki Girişimcilik Eğitiminin Girişimsel Öz Yetkinlik Algısı Üzerine Etkisi: Bir Araştırma. Girişimcilik ve Kalkınma Dergisi, 3(2), 91-107.
  • Teoh, H.Y. ve Foo, S.L. (1997). Moderating effects of tolerance for ambiguity and risktaking propensity on the role conflict-perceived performance relationship: Evidence from Singaporean entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(1), 67-81.
  • Thomas, A. S. ve Mueller, S. L. (2000). A case for comparative entrepreneurship: Assessing the relevance of culture. Journal of International Business Studies, 31(2), 287-301.
  • Turker, D. ve Selçuk, S. (2009). Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students?. Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(2), 142-159.
  • Uygun, M. ve Güner, E. (2016). Girişimcilik Eğiliminin Gelişiminde Girişimcilik Eğitiminin Rolü. Manas Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(5): 37-57.
  • Uluyol, O. (2013). Öğrencilerin Girişimcilik Eğilimlerinin Belirlenmesi: Gölbaşı Meslek Yüksekokulu Örneği, Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 15, 349-372.
  • Wu, S., Matthews ve Dagher, G. K. (2007). Need for achievement, business goals, and entrepreneurial persistence. Management Research News, 30(12), 928-941.
  • Yılmaz, Ali Sırrı. 2014. Bir Sosyal Değişim Ajanı Olarak Girişimcilik Eğitimi. Journal of World of Turks, 6(1): 297-310.
  • Zhao, H., Seibert, S. E. ve Lumpkin, G. T. (2010). The relationship of personality to entrepreneurial intentions and performance: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Management, 36(2), 381-404.
  • Zibarras, L. D., Port, R. L. ve Woods, S. A. (2008). Innovation and the 'Dark Side'of Personality: Dysfunctional Traits and their Relation to Self‐Reported Innovative Characteristics. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 42(3), 201-215.