Evaluation of Teachers ' Views Concerning Ideality Levels

The purpose of this research to evaluate of teachers’ view about idealism and ideality levels. In this research interviewing technique was used which is one of the qualitative research. Interview forms have been finalized with the help of expert opinions. Questions were asked to the 15 teachers, working at Erenler College, the definition of the ideal teacher, the factors that affect the level of idealism, the degree of professional burnout, and about the level of idealism when graduated and after taking the profession. Data from interviews were analyzed by descriptive analysis. The basis of results from interviews: 1- An idealistic teacher is someone who stands behind his own values, who is diligent, knows the needs of the times and keeps up with the future, and teaches his knowledge efficiently and beautifully..2- The best source of motivation for being an idealist teacher is, learning and success of students. 3- The teachers' opinions about professional burnout is monotony in the professional sense, not being ready for lessons, is the ordinary of the course work.4- Factors affecting the level of idealism are environmental factors such as the quality of the school, the attitude, the family, friends, the environment in which the person lives. 5- The level of idealism teachers had when they were undergraduates decreased after they were been to the profession.

Keywords:

Idealism, Ideal teacher Burnout level,

PDF

___

Brunsting N.C., Sreckovic M.A. (2014). Special education teacher burnout: A synthesis of research from 1979 to 2013. Education and Treatment of Children, 37 (4). Çetin Ş. (2001). İdeal öğretmen üzerine bir araştirma. Milli Eğitim Dergisi,149. Demirtaş,Z. & Aksoy, G. (2016). Investigation of pedagogical formation certification program students’ attitudes towards teaching profession in terms of some variables. International Journal of Educational Research Review,1(1),21-28. Duman,T. & Karagöz,S. (2016). An evaluation of Turkish teacher education system compared to other models in different countries. International Journal of Educational Research Review,1(1),1-13. Duymaz R. (2012). İdealist öğretmen’in eğitim anlayışı. Edirne . Erden M. (1998). Öğretmenlik mesleğine giriş. İstanbul. Gündüz B. (2005). İlköğretim öğretmenlerinde tükenmişlik. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 1(1),152-166. Karaköse İ. & Kocabaş İ. (2006). Özel ve Devlet okullarında öğretmenlerin beklentilerinin iş doyumu ve motivasyon üzerine etkileri. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 2 (1), 3-14. Marso, R.; Pigge, L. (1992). Teachers' ratings of job entryexpectations prior to and following first year of teaching: Evidence of Idealistic Expectations and Transition Shock. Chicago. Sarıtaş S. (2013). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerine göre ideal öğretmen özellikleri.Yüksek lisans tezi, Ankara. Tunaboylu M.(2015). İlkokul ve ortaokul öğretmenlerinin mesleki tükenmişlik tükenmişlik düzeyleri. Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi,İzmir.

International Journal of Educational Research Review-Cover

Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
Başlangıç: 2016
Yayıncı: Sakarya Üniversitesi

Arşiv