Learning together assisted with of 7-in-1 box: Creating Effectiveness of Mathematic Learning outcomes of Elementary School

The implementation of learning model along with the manipulative tools is a key of achievement of mathematic learning. The combination of learning together model and manipulative tool of 7 in 1 box is one of options for teacher in teaching mathematic in elementary school, because it has great effect of learning outcomes. This study aims to find out the effectiveness of learning together model assisted with 7 in 1 box toward the result of mathematic learning on 4rth grade students of SDN Gugus Bisma. This is a quasi experimental study using nonequivalent pretest-posttest control group design. The population of 4th grade students of SDN Gugus Bisma was 135. Meanwhile, the sampling was conducted by using cluster sampling and it was obtained that 4th grade students of SDN 1 Sokawera as many as 30 students as experiment class and 4th grade of SDN 3 Sokawera as 25 students as control class. Data analysis by using z-test, gain and N-gain test, t-test. From the result of z-test it was obtained that z-table =1,64, on experiment class (z-score = 3,16) and control (z-score = 2.89). the result of analysis of gain test shows that the gain value of experiment class=22 and control class=15, meanwhile N-gain test shows that N-gain of experiment class= 0.58 and control class =0.40. both class show the increase of learning outcome of medium categ ory. From T-test it was obtaine tscore (4.41) > t-table (1.705), thus Ho was rejected. The conclusion shows that the implementation of learning together assisted with 7 in 1 box effective in increasing the study result of mathematic on 4th grade students of SDN Gugus Bisma

___

  • Amin, A., & Suardiman, S. P. (2016). Perbedaan prestasi belajar matematika siswa ditinjau dari gaya belajar dan model pembelajaran. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 4, 12–19. Capp, G., Benbenishty, R., Astor, R. A., & Pineda, D. (2018). Learning together: Implementation of a peertutoring ıntervention targeting academic and social–emotional needs. Children & Schools, 40(3), 173–184. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cs/cdy009 Chandrawati, A. E. (2013). 7 in 1, Alat Peraga dari Sekotak Catur. USAID PRIORITAS: Mengutamakan Pembaharuan, Inovasi, dan Kesempatan bagi Guru, Tenaga Kependidikan, dan Siswa. Cope, L. (2015). Math manipulatives : Making the abstract tangible.Delta Journal of Education, 5(1), 10–19. Department for Education and Child Development (2013). Final ımpact report: An evaluation of the expansion of Learning Together under the Smarter Schools National Partnership, Part one. South Australia: Government of South Australia. Djamarah, S. B. (2010). Guru dan anak didik dalam ınteraksi edukatif suatu pendekatana teoretis psikologis. Jakarta: Rineka Ilmu. Fathurrohman (2015). Model-model pembelajaran ınovatif. Jogjakarta: AR-RUZZ MEDIA. Furner, J. M., & Marinas, Carol A. Geoboards to Geogebra: Movıng From The Concrete to The Abstract In Geometry. Electronic Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate MathematicsDenver, Colorado, March 17-20. Ghaith, G. (2003). Bilingual research journal : The Journal of the National Association for Bilingual Education Effects of the Learning Together Model of Cooperative Learning on English as a Foreign Language Reading Achievement , Academic Self- Esteem , and Feelings of School Alienation, (September), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2003.10162603 Gillies, R. M., & Gillies, R. M. (2016). Cooperative learning : Review of research and practice. International Journal of Primary, Elementary and Early Years Education, 41(3). Gokkurt, B., Dundar, S., Soylu, Y., & Akgun, L. (2012). The effects of learning together technique which is based on cooperative learning on student achieevement in mathematics class. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 46, 3431–3434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.079 Gürbüz, F. (2013). Effects of reading-writing-application and learning together techniques on 6 th grade students ’ academic achievements on the subject of “ Matter and Temperature. Mije 3(2), 139–150.DOI: 10.13054/mije.13.45.3.2. Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. Hobri, et al. (2018). The ımplementation of learning together in ımproving students’ mathematical performance. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 483-496. Huda, M. (2013). Model Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar. Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2006). Learning together and alone : Overview and meta ‐ analysis learning together and alone : Overview and meta-analysis. Journal Asia Pacific Journal of Education. (May), 37–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/0218879020220110. Johnson, R. B. & Christensen, L. (2014). Educational research: Quantitative, Qualitative, And Mixed Approaches 5th Edition. United States of Amerika: SAGE Publications, Inc. Joyce, B. & Weil, M. (2015). Models of teaching, ninth edition. Boston: Pearson. Kontaş, H. (2016). The effect of manipulatives on mathematics achievement and attitudes of secondary school students. Journal of Education and Learning, 5(3), 10–20. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p10 Kristiani, N., & Prasetyo, Z. K. (2016). Keefektıfan Pembelajaran Metematıka Melaluı Penggunaan Medıa Benda Konkret Pada Kelas V Sd Tımuran. Jurnal Prima Edukasia, 4, 163–175. Laski, E. V, Jor, J. R., Daoust, C., & Murray, A. K. (2015). What makes mathematics manipulatives effective? Lessons from cognitive science and montessori education. Lessons From Cognitive Science and Montessori Education, https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015589588 Meganingtyas, B. R., Winarni, R., & Murwaningsih, T. (2019). The effect of using course review horay and talking stick learning methods towards social science learning result reviewed from learning ınterest. International Journal of Educational Research Review, 4(2), 70–77. Muchyidin, & Kartika, I. (2014). Perbandingan Pemahaman Matematika Siswa Antara Kelas yang Menggunakan Metode Student Facilitator And Explaining dengan Metode Peer Teaching Pokok Bahasan Bangun Ruang Sisi Datar, 3(2). Mulyanto, H., & Indriayu, M. (2018). The effect of problem based learning model on student mathematics learning outcomes viewed from critical thinking skills . International Journal of Educational Research Review, 3(2), 37–45. Özsoy, N. & Yildiz, N. (2004). The effect of learning together technique of cooperative learning method on student achievement in mathematics teaching 7th class of primary school. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET, 3(3), Article 7. 49-54. Rahayu, S., Windayana, H., & Halimah, L. (2015). Model Kooperatif Tipe Learning Together untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal PGSD Kampus Cibiru, 3(2). Rahmawati, R. D., & Mahmudi, A. (2014). Jurnal Prima Edukasia, Volume 2 - Nomor 1, 2014, 2(1), 102–115. Republik Indonesia. (2006). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional RI Nomor 22 Tahun 2006 tentang Standar Isi untuk Satuan Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah. Jakarta: Menteri Pendidikan Nasional. Salahudeen, A. B., & Saidu, S. (2016). Effects of geoboard and geographıical globe on senıior secondary school students ’ performance ın mathematıcs ın kaduna state. ATBU, Journal of Science, Technology & Education (JOSTE),. 4 (1)140-148. Scandrett, H. (2008). Using geoboards in primary mathematics. Australian Primary Mathematics Classroom, 13(2), 29-32. Slavin, R. E . (2015). Cooperative learning : Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Edisi 15. (Terjemahan N. Yusron, Bandung: Nusa Media). Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Thurston, A. (2013). Learning together in mathematics. Centre for Effective Education, Queen’s University Belfast. Unamba, E.C. (2015). Effect of learningtogether technique on pupils achievement in primary mathematics . Jurnal Research in Education and Society. 6(1), 59-65. Warner, S., & Kaur, A. (2017). The Perceptions of Teachers and Students on a 21 st Century Mathematics Instructional Model. Internatıonal Electronıc Journal Of Mathematics Education, 12(2), 193–215.