___

• Akyol, H. (2007). Vygotsky, Piaget ve Yapılandırmacı Okuma Eğitimi. VI. Ulusal Sınıf Öğretmenliği Kongresi Bildiri Kitabı, Eskişehir.
• Black, P. & William, D. (1998). Assessment and classroom learning. Assessment Education, 5 (1), pp.7-74.
• Brookhart, S.M. (2011). Educational assessment knowledge and skills for teachers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 3(1), pp. 3-12.
• Clark, K. & Dwyer, F. M. (1998). Effect of differenttypes of computer-assisted feedbacks trategies on achievement and response confidence. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(1), pp.55-63.
• Carvalhoa, C. & Santosa J. & Conboya, J. & Martinsa D. (2014). Teachers´ feedback: Exploring differences in students´ perceptions. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 159, pp. 169-173.
• Crooks, T.J. (1988). The impact of classroom evaluation on students. Review of Educational Research, 5, pp. 438-481.
• Dempsey J.V., Litchfield B.C. & Driscoll M.P., (1993). Feedback, Retention, Discrimination
• Error, and Feedback Study Time, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 25: 3, pp. 303-326.
• Duhon, G., House, S., Hastings, K., Poncy, B. & Solomon, B. (2015). Adding immediate feedback to explicit timing: An option for enhancing treatment ıntensity to ımprove mathematics fluency. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24(1), pp. 74-87.
• Eraz, G. & Öksüz, C. (2015). Sınıf Öğretmenlerinin Öğrencilerin Ders Dışı Matematik Etkinliklerine Ilişkin Uyguladıkları Geribildirimlerin Etkisi. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 36, ss.105-119.
• Erişen, Y. (1997). Öğretim Elemanlarının Dönüt ve Düzeltme Davranışlarını Yerine Getirme Dereceleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Egitim Yönetimi Dergisi, 3(1), ss. 45-62.
• Foote, C.J. (1999). Attribution feedback in the elementary classroom. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 13(2), 155-166.
• Hattie, J. & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback, Review of Educational Research, 77 (1), pp. 81-112.
• Kluger, A.N. & Denisi, A. (1996). The Effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 2(2), pp. 254-284.
• Köğce, D. & Baki, A. (2012). İlköğretim Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Geribildirim Kavramına İlişkin Inanışları, X. Ulusal Fen Bilimleri ve Matematik Eğitimi Kongresi, 27-30 Haziran, Niğde.
• Labuhn, A.S., Zimmerman, B.J., & Hasselhorn, M.(2010). Enhancing students’ self-regulation and mathematics performance: The influence of feedback and self-evaluative standards. Metacognition and Learning, 5(2), pp. 173-194.
• Mory, E.H. (2004). Feedback research revisited. In D. Jonassen, (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Education Communications and Technology (pp. 745-783). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Manouchehri, A. (2007). Inquiry-discourse mathematics instruction. Mathematics Teacher, 101 (4), pp. 290-300.
• Manouchehri, A. & St. John, D. (2006). From classroom discussions to group discourse. Mathematics Teacher, 99 (8), pp. 544–551.
• Naroth, C. (2010). Constructive teacher feedback for enhancing learner performance in mathematics.
• [serial online]. n.d.; Available from: Networked Digital Library of Theses & Dissertations, Ipswich, MA. 21 Ağustos 2016 da ulaşılmıştır.
• Nordstrom, C.R., Wendland, D. & Williams, K.B. (1998). “To err is human”: An examination of the effectiveness of error management training, Journal of Business and Pschology, 12, 3, pp. 269-282.
• Kahl, S. (2005). Where in the world are formative tests? Right under your nose! Education Week, 25 (4), 38.
• Looney, J. (Ed.). (2005). Formative assessment: Improving learning in secondary classrooms. Paris, France: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development.
• Peker, R. (1992). Geri Bildirimin Üniversite Öğrencilerinin Ölçme Ve Değerlendirme Dersindeki Başarısına Etkisi. UludağÜniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(1), ss. 31-39.
• Rakoczy, K., Klieme, E., Bürgermeister, A. & Harks, B. (2008). The interplay between student evaluation and instruction. grading and feedback in mathematics classrooms. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 216, pp. 110–123.
• Rakoczy, K., Harks, B., Klieme, E., Blum, W. & Hochweber, J. (2013). Written feedback in mathematics: Mediated by students´ perception, moderated by goal orientation. Learning and Instruction, 27, pp. 63-73.
• Roschelle, J., Rafanan, K., Bhanot, R., Estrella, G., Penuel, B., Nussbaum, M., & Claro, S. (2010). Scaffolding group explanation and feedback with handheld technology: Impact on students' mathematics learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, (4), pp. 399-404.
• Sadler, D.R. (1998). Formative assessment: revisiting the territory. Assessment in Education, 5(1), pp. 77-84.
• Saracaloğlu, A.S., Gencel, İ.E. & Çengel, M. (2011). Öğrenci ve Öğretmen Görüşleri Açısından Lise Öğretmenlerinin Öğretme Sürecindeki Yeterlikleri, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Aralık, 2 (2), ss.77-99.
• Stevenson, C.E., Heiser, W. J. & Resing, W. C. M. (2013). Working memory as a moderator of training and transfer of analogical reasoning in children. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), pp.159-169.
• Stone, N.J. (2000). Exploring the relationship between calibration and self-regulated learning. Educational Psychology Review, 12, pp. 437-475.
• Şahin, M. (2015). Öğrenme ve Öğretme Sürecinde Uygulanan Dönüt Etkinliği ile İlgili Öğretmen Adaylarının Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi, Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15(1), ss.247-264.
• Santagata, R. (2002). When student make mistake: Socialization practices in ıtaly and the united states, Doctoral Dissertation, Los Angelels: University of California, Philosophy in Psychology.
• Turkdoğan, A. Baki, A. (2012). İlköğretim İkinci Kademe Matematik Öğretmenlerinin Yanlışlara Dönüt Vermede Kullandıkları Donüt Teknikleri, Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 45, (2), ss.157-182.
• Warden, C.A. (2000). EFL business writing behaviors in differing feedback environments. Language Learning, 50 (4), pp. 573–616.
• Wigfield, A., Klauda, S.L., & Cambria, J. (2008). Influences on the development of academic self-regulatory processes. In B.J. Zimmerman, & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of selfregulation of learning and performance (pp.33-48). New York: Routledge.
• Zimmerman, B.J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Perceptions of efficacy and strategy use in the self-regulation of learning. In D. H. Schuck & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.