Küreselleşmenin KİT’lerin Ekonomideki Payına Etkisi

Küreselleşme, dünyada sınır maliyetlerinin azalması ve serbestleşmenin ekonomiye hakim olmasıyla rekabetin artmasını ifade etmektedir. Bu nedenle devletin ekonomik faaliyette bulunması küreselleşmenin doğasına uygun olmayacak ve haksız rekabet yaratacaktır. Küreselleşmenin önem kazandığı 1980’li yıllar aynı zamanda özelleştirmenin öne çıktığı bir dönemin de başlangıcı olmuştur. Özelleştirme küreselleşmenin en önemli enstrümanlarından biri olarak özellikle 1990’lı yıllarda dünya genelinde Kamu İktisadi Teşebbüslerinin önemli ölçüde özele devredilmesini sağlamıştır. KİT’lere yapılan en önemli eleştiri etkinliği sağlayamayarak kıt kaynakların israf edilmesi olarak ifade edilmektedir. Bu anlayışı benimseyen neoliberal politikalar doğrultusunda KİT’ler özelleştirildikçe devletin ekonomideki payı veya üretimdeki payı da giderek azalacak ve etkinlik sağlanarak rekabette avantaj yakalanacaktı. Çalışma, küreselleşmenin hakim olduğu yaklaşık 40 yılda özelleştirmelerle KİT’lerin üretimdeki payı açısından gelinen durumu gelişmiş ve gelişmekte olan ülkeler açısından değerlendirmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Küreselleşme, KİT’ler, Özelleştirme, Devletin büyüklüğü, Etkinlik

The Impact of Globalization on the Economic Share of SOE’s

Globalization refers to increasing competition with lowering border cost and higher degree of liberalization. For that reason the economic production of state is not accepted and if state intervenes to the economy it will result with imperfect competition. When globalization has gain importance around the world in 1980’s, privatization has become the most effective instrument to maintain an important volume of privatization of SOE’s after 1990’s. One of the most important criticisms on SOE’s is the inefficiency and the waste of scarce economic resources. According to the neoliberal policies that supports the inefficiency of SMO’s, privatization will decrease the size of state production and increase the efficiency which will result with higher competitiveness. The impact of globalization in the last 40 years will be analyzed with comparison of data between developed and developing countries.

Keywords:

Globalization, SOE’s, Privatization, Size of the State, Efficiency,

PDF

___

Abramov, A., Radygin A. ve Maria Chernova (2017). State-owned enterprises in the Russian market: Ownership structure and their role in the economy. Russian Journal of Economics, 3 (2017), 1-23.
Armstrong, P. (2015). How improvements in SOEs can help emerging markets address their development challenges. State-owned Enterprises Commentary, Spring 2015, http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect /1299668047f4ee8bae58ff299ede9589/EB_IFC_Phil_Armstrong.pdf?MOD=AJPERES.
Bance, P. and G. Obermann (2015). Serving the general interest with public enterprises: new forms of governance and trends in ownership. Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86, 529-534.
Bernier, Luc ed. (2015). Public Enterprises Today: Missions, Performance and Governance, learning from fifteen cases, CIRIEC Collection “Social Economy & Public Economy”, No.5
Bernier, L. (2014). Public enterprises as policy instruments: the importance of public entrepreneurship. Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 17(3), 253-266.
Büge, M.; Egeland, M.; Kowalski,P. ve Sztajerowska, M. (2013). State-owned enterprises in the global economy: Reason for concern?, CEPR’s Policy Portal, inequality. [Online] at http://voxeu.org/article/state-owned-enterprises-global-economy-reason-concern, accessed January 15th, 2017.
Christiansen, H. (2011). The Size and Composition of the SOE Sector in OECD Countries. OECD Corporate Governance Working Papers, No. 5, OECD Publishing, Paris. [Online] at http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/5kg54cwps0s3-en
Clò, S., C.F. Del Bo, C. F. , Ferraris, M, Fiorio, C., Florio, M., Vandone, D. and C. Fiorio (2015). Public Enterprises in the Market for Corporate Control: recent worldwide evidence, Annals of Public and Cooperative Economics, 86, 559-583.
Dewenter, K. L. & Malatesta, P. H. (1996). Public Offerings of State-Owned and Privately-Owned Enterprises: An International Comparison, http://www.afajof.org/SpringboardWebApp/userfiles/afa/file/Supplements%20and%20Data%20Sets/Appendicies%20for%20Public-Offerings%20of%20 State-Owned%20and%20Privately-Owned%20Enterprises%20An%20 International%20Comparison%20ap5080(1).pdf, accessed June 15th, 2016.
Haggarty, L. ve Mary M. Shirley (1987). A New Data Base on State-Owned Enterprises, The World Bank Economic Review, 11(3), 491-513.
Hemming, R. and Mansoor A.M. (1987). Privatization and Public Enterprises, IMF Working Paper, WP87/9.
Forbes Global 2000, (2017), The Worlds Biggest Public Companies, https://www.forbes.com/global2000/list/#tab:overall, accessed September 1st, 2017.
Kowalski, P., Büge, M., Sztajerowska, M. and Matias Egeland (2013). “State-Owned Enterprises: Trade Effects and Policy Implications”, OECD Trade Policy Papers, No. 147, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5k4869ckqk7l-en
Nunnenkamp, P. (1986). State enterprises in developing countries, Intereconomics, ISSN 0020-5346, 21(4), 186-193, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02925384
OECD (2014). Workshop on State-Owned Enterprises in the Development Process. https://www.oecd.org/daf/ca/Workshop_SOEsDevelopmentProcess _Brazil.pdf
Smith, D.A.C. & Trebilcock M.J. (2001). State-Owned Enterprises in Less Developed Countries: Privatization and Alternative Reform Strategies, European Journal of Law and Economics, 12: 217-252. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012817825552
Sturesson J., McIntyre S., ve Jones, N. (2015). State-Owned Enterprises Catalysts for public value crieation. https://www.pwc.com/gx/ en/psrc/publications/ assets/pwc-state-owned-enterprise-psrc.pdf.
TC Hazine Müsteşarlığı (2016). Kamu Sermayeli Kuruluş ve İşletmeler İstatistikleri, https://www.hazine.gov.tr/tr-TR/Istatistik-Sunum-Sayfasi?mid=60&cid=14&nm=299, accessed August 15th, 2017.