Ali KOCATAS, Erdem KİNACİ, Mehmet Abdussamet BOZKURT, Osman KONES, Eyup GEMİCİ, Halil ALİS, Murat GONENC, Cevher AKARSU

The efficiency of laparoscopy in patients with complicated appendicitis

Aim: Laparoscopic approach for complicated appendicitis (CA) is a controversial issue. Although it has been generallyrecommended, conflicting results have been reported in literature. The aim of this study is to obtain the current results regarding laparoscopic surgery for CA.Material and Methods: Patients who underwent surgery for acute appendicitis between July 2009 and January 2011 in Dr Sadi Konuk Training and Research Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Appendicitis was considered as CA when there were one of the following criteria; existence of accompanying intra-abdominal abscess, peritonitis, gangrene or perforation confirmed by a histopathological examination. The patients with CA were divided into two groups, laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) group and open appendectomy (OA) group. Demographics, perioperative findings and postoperative course were compared.Results: 846 patients with the diagnosis of appendicitis underwent surgery at our center. Of these, 124 cases were complicatedappendicitis. Eighty-five (68.5%) and 39 (31.5%) patients underwent to LA and OA, respectively. The mean ages in two groups were compatible (p=0.224). The mean body mass index was significantly higher in LA group. Presence of accompanying abscess and use of intra-abdominal drain were similar in both groups (p>0.05). Duration of operation was significantly higher in LA group (76.133.7 vs 57.8 22.5) (p=0.001). Although postoperative intra-abdominal abscess formation was slightly higher in LA groups (7 cases vs 1 case), there was no difference in postoperative complication between two groups. Length of hospitalization was also not different in both groups. Time to oral feeding was significantly earlier in LA group.Conclusion: Laparoscopy in complicated appendicitis can be the first choice with no increase in postoperative complications. However, the longer operation time is still a problem for laparoscopic technique despite increasing experience. According to us, future studies should be focused on this problem.

PDF

___

Temple LK, Litwin DE, McLeod RS. A meta-analysis of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in patients suspected of having acute appendicitis. Can J Surg 1999;42(5):377-83.
Garbutt JM, Soper NJ, Shannon WD, Botero A, Littenberg B. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing laparoscopic and open appendectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc 1999;9(1):17-26.
Chung RS, Rowland DY, Li P, Diaz J. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of laparoscopic versus conventional appendectomy. Am J Surg 1999;177(3):250-6.
Yau KK, Siu WT, Tang CN, Yang GP, Li MK. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy for complicated appendicitis. J Am Coll Surg 2007;205(1):60-5.
Fukami Y, Hasegawa H, Sakamoto E, Komatsu S, Hiromatsu T. Value of laparoscopic appendectomy in perforated appendicitis. World J Surg 2007;31:93-97.
Cash C, Frazee R. Improvements in laparoscopic treatment or complicated appendicitis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2012;22(6):581-3.
McBurney C. “The incision made in the abdominal wall in cases of appendicitis, with a description of a new method of operating,” Ann Surg 1894;20(1):38-43.
Switzer NJ, Gill RS, Karmali S. The evolution of the appendectomy: from open to laparoscopic to single incision. Scientifica (Cairo) 2012;2012:895469.
Markides G, Subar D, Riyad K. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in adults with complicated appendicitis: systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Surg 2010;34(9):2026-40.
Dimitriou I, Reckmann B, Nephuth O, Betzler M. Single institution's experience in laparoscopic appendectomy as a suitable therapy for complicated appendicitis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2013;398:147-52.
Mohamed AA, Mahran KM. Laparoscopic appendectomy in complicated appendicitis: Is it safe? J Minim Access Surg 2013;9(2):55-8.
Lin YM, Hsieh CH, Cheng CI, Tan BL, Liu HT. Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated acute appendicitis does not result in increased surgical complications. Asian J Surg 2012;35(3):113-6.
Pokala N, Sadhasivam S, Kiran RP, Parithivel V. Complicated appendicitis-is the laparoscopic approach appropriate. A comparative study with the open approach: Outcome in a community hospital setting? Am Surg 2007;73:737-41.
Krukowski ZH, Irwin ST, Denholm S, Matheson NA. Preventing wound infection after appendicectomy: a review. Br J Surg 1988;75(10):1023-33.
Sauerland S, Lefering R, Neugebauer EA. Laparoscopic versus open surgery for suspected appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004-2002;(1) CD001546.
Golub R, Siddiqui F, Pohl D. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: A metaanalysis. J Am Coll Surg 1998;186(5):545-53.
Semm K. Endoscopic appendectomy. Endoscopy 1983;15(2):59-64.