Results of scleral fixated intraocular lens implantation

Results of scleral fixated intraocular lens implantation

Aim: To evaluate the results of scleral fixated intraocular lenses (SFIOLs) implantation in eyes that had lost capsular support.Material and methods: Eyes of twenty patients who had lost their capsular support due to various causes included in this study. This study involved 5 females and 15 males. Eight eyes were included following complicated cataract surgeries, five eyes were patients in trauma, three eyes were with subluxated intraocular lens, three aphakic eyes which underwent congenital cataract surgeries andone eye that had beginning of bullous keratopathy due to anterior chamber lens were operated. The secondary SFIOLs implantation were performed in all eyes. Preoperative and postoperative best corrected visual acuities were compared.Results: The mean age of patients was 61.4±15.04 years. The mean follow-up time was 3.12±0.7 months. The best corrected mean preoperative and postoperative visual acuities of patients were found as 0.16±0.02 and 0.38±0.07; respectively, using the Snellen chart. In our study; in two patients corneal edema, in one patient pupillary irregularity and in one patient increased intraocular pressure were observed. There was a statistically significant difference between the mean preoperative and postoperative visual acuities of patients according to the Wilcoxon test (p=0.01).Conclusion: SFIOLs implantation have still maintained its importance for correction of aphakia in patients without adequate capsular support despite all new developments.

___

  • Ercalık NY, Macin A, Cengiz O, Cengiz MK, Sanisoglu H, Sevim MS. Comparison of the results of secondary anterior chamber and secondary scleral-fixated ıntraocular lens ımplantation in complicated phacoemulsification cases. Turk J Ophthalmol 2014;44(2):102-7.
  • Buyuktortop N, Alp MN, Kural G. Transscleral fixation of posterior chamber ıntraocular lenses: safety and visual outcome with respect to etiology and timing of surgery. J Glaucoma-Cataract 2006;1:47-52.
  • Long C, Wei Y, Yuan Z, Zhang Z, Lin X, Liu B. Modified technique for transscleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. BMC Ophthalmol 2015;15:127.
  • Choragiewicz T, Rejdak R, Grzybowski A, Nowomiejska K, Moneta-Wielgos J, Ozimek M, et al. Outcomes of sutureless iris-claw lens implantation. J Ophthalmol 2016;2016:7013709.
  • Teng H, Zhang H. Comparison of Artisan iris-claw intraocular lens implantation and posterior chamber intraocular lens sulcus fixation for aphakic eyes. Int J Ophthalmol 2014;7(2):283-7.
  • Lett KS, Chaudhuri PR. Visual outcomes following Artisan aphakia iris claw lens implantation. Eye (Lond) 2011;25(1):73-6.
  • Schallenberg M, Dekowski D, Hahn A, Laube T, Steuhl KP, Meller D. Aphakia correction with retropupillary fixated irisclaw lens (Artisan) - long-term results. Clin Ophthalmol 2014;8:137-41.
  • Forlini M, Soliman W, Bratu A, Rossini P, Cavallini GM, Forlini C. Long-term follow-up of retropupillary iris-claw intraocular lens implantation: a retrospective analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 2015;15:143.
  • Krachmer JH, Mannis MJ, Holland EJ. Cornea. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby; 2005.
  • Stem MS, Todorich B, Woodward MA, Hsu J, Wolfe JD. Scleral fixated intraocular lenses: past and present. J Vitreoretin Dis 2017;1(2):144-52.
  • Por YM, Lavin MJ. Techniques of intraocular lens suspension in the absence of capsular/zonular support. Surv Ophthalmol 2005;50(5):429-62.
  • Zeh WG, Price FW Jr. Iris fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2000;26(7):1028-34.
  • Fernández-Buenaga R, Alio JL, Pérez-Ardoy AL, LarrosaQuesada A, Pinilla-Cortes L, Barraquer R, et al. Late in-thebag intraocular lens dislocation requiring explantation: risk factors and outcomes. Eye 2013;27(7):795-801.
  • Ram J, Gupta N, Chaudhary M, Verma N. A new surgical technique using steel suture for trans-scleral fixation of posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Indian J Ophthalmol 2013;61(12):749-51.
  • Holt DG, Stagg B,Young J, Ambati BK. ACIOL, sutured PCIOL, or glued IOL: Where do we stand? Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012 ;23(1):62-7.
İnönü Üniversitesi Turgut Özal Tıp Merkezi Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-1744
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide predicts instent restenosis in patients with stable coronary artery disease

Adil BAYRAMOGLU

Do elevated blood calcium levels in patients with peptic ulcer facilitate perforation?

Turgut ANUK, Ali Cihat YILDIRIM, Sahin KAHRAMANCA

Retrospective evaluation of patients with humoral immune deficiency

Turkan PATİROGLU, Murat CANSEVER

Relationship among pain, function, and motor activity in early hemiplegic patients

Burcu TALU, Suat KAMİSLİ, Yasin TALU

Comparison of platelet indices in papillary thyroid carcinoma and microcarcinoma

FATİH KARA, Mahmut Can YAGMURDUR, Bulent GUVENDİ, Kenan BİNNETOGLU, Gulname Findik GUVENDİ, Yasemen ADALİ, Tugba TOYRAN

Evaluating effects of different musical types on depression, sleep quality, mental state and anxiety in stroke patients

Esra DOĞRU HÜZMELİ, Murat GUNTEL, İsmet MELEK, Ersin DAG, Nilufer KORKMAZ CETİSLİ, Nilay BALCİ ÇOMUK

Internalized stigmatization and social functioning in psychiatric patients

Melek YORULMAZ, Selin GUMUSTAS OZDEMİR, Sevgi Nehir TURKMEN, Enes KOZA

Olanzapine-induced renal damages and metabolic side effects: the protective effects of thymoquinone

Mehmet Kaya OZER, Deniz KORKMAZ TAŞTEMİR, Sedat BİLGİC, Ayse Nilay GÜVENC, Nevin KOCAMAN, Sebile AZİRAK

Results of scleral fixated intraocular lens implantation

Behice Suheda DUMAN, Abuzer GUNDUZ, Tongabay CUMURCU, Ercan OZSOY

A case of hydatid cyst presented with chronic weight loss

Semra KARA, Suzan GUNDUZ, Cigdem Nuket YUKSEL, Tugba HALİCİ TAŞ, Abdulkadir EREN