The Children's Perceptions of the Teacher: An Analysis of the Drawings Created by the Children

This study aims to determine how 66 and 68 months old children in the first grade of primary school perceive their teachers by their drawings. The study was carried out during the spring semester of 2015-2016 academic year. The research was based on the phenomenological design, a qualitative research method. Cluster sampling method, which is a randomization based sampling method, was used in this study. The research sample was composed of 152 first graders (80 boys and 72 girls) in Bornova, Izmir. The children were asked to draw the teacher in their imagination during one class period (40 minutes) while their teachers were present in the classroom. After the drawings completed, each student told the researcher what they drew. Drawings obtained within the scope of the study have been analyzed with Teacher Perception Coding List developed by Aykaç (2012). Most of the children illustrated their teachers as female, cheerful, clean and well-groomed. Besides, the children’s gender did not make any significant differences in their teacher perception.

The Children's Perceptions of the Teacher: An Analysis of the Drawings Created by the Children

This study aims to determine how 66 and 68 months old children in the first grade of primary school perceive their teachers by their drawings. The study was carried out during the spring semester of 2015-2016 academic year. The research was based on the phenomenological design, a qualitative research method. Cluster sampling method, which is a randomization based sampling method, was used in this study. The research sample was composed of 152 first graders (80 boys and 72 girls) in Bornova, Izmir. The children were asked to draw the teacher in their imagination during one class period (40 minutes) while their teachers were present in the classroom. After the drawings completed, each student told the researcher what they drew. Drawings obtained within the scope of the study have been analyzed with Teacher Perception Coding List developed by Aykaç (2012). Most of the children illustrated their teachers as female, cheerful, clean and well-groomed. Besides, the children’s gender did not make any significant differences in their teacher perception.

___

  • Ahi, B., Cingi, M. A., & Kıldan, A. O. (2016). 48-60 Aylık çocukların öğretmen kavramına yönelik algılarının çizimler aracılığıyla incelenmesi. Elementary Education Online, 15(1), 77-90.
  • Artut, K. (2007). Okuloncesinde resim eğitimi. (2nd ed.). Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık. Aslan, K., Aslan, N., & Arslan-Cansever, B. (2012). Eğitim bilimine giriş. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Aykaç, N. (2012). İlköğretim öğrencilerinin resimlerinde öğretmen ve öğrenme süreci algısı. Egitim ve Bilim, (37) 164, 298-315.
  • Birch, S. H. & Ladd, G. W. (1997). The teacher-child relationship and children’s early school adjustment. Journal of School Pschology, 35(1), 65-79.
  • Buldu, M. (2006). Young children’s perceptions of scientists: A preliminary study. Educational Research, 48(1), 121-132.
  • Balci, E. (1991). Öğretmenlerin rolleri. Egitim Sosyolojisi, Ankara.
  • Çam Aktaş, B. (2010). Investigating primary school students’ perceptions regarding ‘teacher’ through their drawings. The International Journal of Learning, 17(8), 409-425.
  • Cherney, I. D., Seiwert, C. S., Dickey, T. M., & Flichtbeil, J. D. (2006). Children’s drawings: a mirror to their minds. Educational Psychology, 26(1), 127-142.
  • Doğan, İ. (2011). Eğitim sosyolojisi. Ankara: Nobel Akademi.
  • Fort, D. C. & Vanny, H. L. (1989). How students see scientists: Mostly male, mostly white, and mostly benevolent. Science and Children, 26 (8), 8-13.
  • Fury, G.; Carlson, E. A., & Sroufe, L. A. (1997). Children’s representations of attachment relationships in family drawings. Child Development, 68, 1154-1164.
  • Giddens, A. (2009). Sociology. ( 6th ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Harrison, L. J., Clarke, L., & Ungerer, J. A. (2007). Children’s drawings provide a new perpective on teacher- child relationship quality and school adjustment. Early Childhood Research Quaterly, 22(1), 55-71.
  • Huber, R. A. & Burton, G. M. (1995). What do students think scientists look like? School Science and Mathematics, 95(7), 371-377.
  • Ingersoll, R. M., Merrill, L., & May, H. (2012). Retaining teachers: How preparation matters. Educational Leadership, 69(8), 30-34.
  • Kaya, O. N., Doğan, A., & Öcal, E. (2008). Turkish elementary school students’ images of scientists. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 32, 83-100.
  • Kehnemuyi, Z. (2009). Çocuğun görsel sanat eğitimi. (6th ed.), İstanbul: Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  • Kesicioğlu, O. S. & Deniz, Ü. (2014). Investigation of pre-school children’s perception of teacher in their drawings. Creative Education, 5, 606- 613.
  • Korkmaz, H. & Kavak, G. (2010). Primary school students’ images of science and scientists. Elementary Education Online, 9(3), 1055-1079.
  • Linderman, M. G. (1997). Art in the elemantary school. United States: The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  • Malchiodi, C. A. (1998). Understanding children's drawings. New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Ministry of National Education (Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı) (2012). Erişim tarihi: 24.03.2016, http://www.meb.gov.tr/haberler/2012/12YillikZorunluEgitimeYonelikGenelge.pdf.
  • Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Mora, N. (2005). Kitle iletişim araçlarında yeniden üretilen cinsiyetçilik ve toplumda yansıması. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 2 (1), 1-7.
  • Oğuz- Ünver, A. (2010). Perceptions of scientists: A comparative study of fifth graders and fourth year student teachers. Necatibey Faculty of Education Electronic Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 4(1), 11-28.
  • Payne, M. A. (1990). Effects on parental presence /absence on size of children’s human figure drawings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 70, 843-849.
  • Rodari, P. (2007). Science and scientist in the drawings of European children. Journal of Science Communication, 6(3), 1-12.
  • Rosenthal, D. B. (1993). Images of scientists: A comparison of biology and liberal studies majors. School Science and Mathematics, 93(4), 212-216.
  • Schibeci, R. A. & Sorensen, I. (1983). Elementary school children's perceptions of scientists. School of Science and Mathematics, 83(1), 14-19.
  • Tezcan, M. (1999). Eğitim sosyolojisi, Ankara: Şafak Matbaacılık.
  • Tietz, W. M. (2007). Women and men in accounting textbooks: exploring the hidden curriculum. Issues in Accounting Education, 22 (3), 459-480.
  • Tutkun, O. F. & Koç. M. (2008). Mesleklere atfedilen kalıp yargılar. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 41, Sayı:1, 255-273.
  • UNESCO. (2006). Teachers and educational quality: monitoring global needs for 2015. Montreal: UNESCO Institute for Statistics.
  • UNESCO. (2012). UNESCO strategy on teachers (2012-¬2015). Erişim tarihi: 21.03.2016, http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0021/002177/217775e.pdf.
  • Yavuzer, H. (2012). Çocuğunuzun ilk 6 yılı. (28th ed.) İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Yavuzer, H. (2013). Resimleriyle çocuk. İstanbul: Remzi Kitabevi.
  • Yıldırım, A. & Şimsek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. (6. baskı.), Ankara: Seçkin Yayınları.
İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2002
  • Yayıncı: İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dekanı