Beyaz Baş Lahana (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) Hibritleri ve Onların Ebeveynleri Arasındaki Morfolojik Varyabilitenin Belirlenmesi

Bu çalışma, yeni deneysel beyaz baş lahana hibritleri ve onların ebeveynlerinin morfolojik özelliklerinibelirlemek için yürütülmüştür. İncelenen hibritler ve ebeveynler arasındaki morfolojik varyabiliteyi belirlemekamacıyla hibritler ve ebeveynler 34 morfolojik özellik için ana bileşen analizi ve kümeleme analizi ile analizedilmiştir. Ana bileşen analizinin sonuçları ilk üç temel bileşenin araştırılan tüm morfolojik özellikler için 28 beyazbaş lahana hibriti arasındaki toplam varyabilitenin %39.76’sını ve 22 beyaz baş lahana ebeveyni arasındaki toplamvaryabilitenin %45.34’ünü açıkladığını göstermiştir. İlk temel bileşen en önemli bileşen olarak bulunmuştur veonu oluşturan özellikler (bitki boyu, bitki eni, baş ağırlığı, baş çapı ve baş yüksekliği) aslında lahana ıslahındaıslahçılar tarafından en büyük öneme sahip özellikler olarak düşünülmektedir. Kümeleme analizinin sonucundabeyaz baş lahana hibritlerinin 11 grupta ve ebeveynlerin 9 grupta kümelendiği belirlenmiştir. Ana bileşen analizi vekümeleme analizi beyaz baş lahana hibritleri ve onların ebeveynlerinin oldukça değişkenlik gösterdiğini, verim veverim bileşenleri için önemli bir varyasyona sahip olduklarını doğrulamıştır.  

Determination of Morphological Variability among Cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) Hybrids and Their Parents

This study carried out to determine morphological traits of new experimental hybrids ofcabbage and their parents. To determine morphological variability among tested hybrids and parents,they were analyzed for 34 morphological traits using Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and ClusterAnalysis (CA). Results of the PCA indicated that the frst three principal components accounted for39.76% of the total variability among the 28 cabbage hybrids and 45.34% of the total variability among22 cabbage parents for all the traits investigated. The frst principal component (PC1) were the mostimportant component and cabbage traits that constitute the PC1 (such as plant height, plant diameter,weight of head, diameter of head and length of head) were in fact the characteristics considered bybreeders to be of greatest importance in cabbage breeding. At the result of CA, the cabbage hybridswere divided into eleven clusters and the cabbage parents were divided into nine clusters. PCA andCA confrmed that the cabbage hybrids and their parents were highly variable and had principally asignifcant variation for yield and yield components.  

___

  • Anonim 2010. Meteoroloji Genel Müdürlüğü. Ankara. Arslanoglu F, Aytac S, Karaca Oner E, 2011. Morphological characterization of the local potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) genotypes collected from the Eastern Black Sea region of Turkey. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(6): 922-932.
  • Balkaya A, Yanmaz R, Apaydin A, Kar H, 2005. Morphological characterization of white head cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata subvar. alba) genotypes in Turkey. New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science, 33: 333-341.
  • Bayraktar K, 1981. Sebze Yetiştirme. Cilt II. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları. No. 169. Bornava, İzmir. 480 s.
  • Cerqueira-Silva CBM, Cardoso-Silva CB, Conceicao LD, Nonato JVA, Oliveira AC, Corrêa RX, 2009. Comparison of coeffcients and distance measurements in passion fruit plants based on molecular markers and physicochemical descriptors. Genetics and Molecular Research, 8(3): 870- 879.
  • Cervenski J, Gvozdanovic-Varga J, Vasic M, Glogovac S, 2010. Multivariate analysis for head weight and yield performance of experimental cabbage hybrids (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.). Genetika, 42(2): 259-266.
  • Cervenski J, Gvozdanovic-Varga J, Glogovac S, Dragin S, 2011a. Variability of characteristics in new experimental hybrids of early cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.). African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(59): 12555-12560.
  • Cervenski J, Gvozdanovic-Varga J, Glogovac S, 2011b. Local cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) populations from Serbian Province of Vojvodina. African Journal of Biotechnology, 10(27): 5281-5285.
  • Crochemore ML, Molinari HBC, Vieira LGE, 2003. Genetic diversity in passion fruit (Passifora spp.) evaluated APD markers. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 46: 521-527.
  • Gvozdanovic-Varga J, Gvozdenovic DJ, Vasic M, Cervenski J, 2004. Review of a collection of experimental watermelon hybrids. Proceedings VIII Symposium Biotehnology and Agroindustry, Velika Plana, November 01-03, pp: 226-234.
  • Hartings H, Berardo N, Mazzinelli GF, Valoti P, Verderio A, Motto M, 2008. Assessment of genetic diversity and relationships among maize (Zea mays L.) Italian landraces by morphological traits and AFLP profling. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 117(6): 831-842.
  • IBPGR, 1990. Descriptors for Brassica and Raphanus. International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, 51 p.
  • Jeffers JNR, 1967. Two cases studies in the application of principal component analysis. Applied Statistics, 16: 225-236.
  • Kar H, Karaağaç O, Kibar B, Apaydın, A, 2008. Beyaz baş lahanada geliştirilen yerli F1 hibrit çeşit adaylarının morfolojik özelliklerinin tanımlanması. VII. Sebze Tarımı Sempozyumu, 26-29 Ağustos, Yalova.
  • Kaygısız Aşçıoğul T, 2009. Bazı lahana genotiplerinin morfolojik ve moleküler tanımlanmasına yönelik araştırmalar. Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir, 94 s.
  • Kendall, M., 1980. Multivariate analysis. Charles Griffn and Co London. 210 p.
  • Lezzoni F, Pritts MP, 1991. Application of principal components analysis to horticulture research. Horticulture, 26(4): 334- 338.
  • Liu J, Liu L, Hou N, Zhang A, Liu C, 2007. Genetic diversity of wheat gene pool of recurrent selection assessed by microsatellite markers and morphological traits. Euphytica, 155: 249-258.
  • Marjanovic-Jeromela A, Marinkovic R, Mijic A, Jankulovska M, Zdunic Z, Nagl N, 2008. Oil yield stability of winter rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) genotypes. Agriculturae Concepectus Scientifcus, 73(4): 217-220.
  • Miller JF, Fick GN, 1997. Sunflower genetics. In: Sunflower Technology and Production (Schneiter AA, ed.). Agronomy Monogram 35, ASA, CSSA and SSSA, Madison, WI, USA, pp: 441-495.
  • Mohammadi SA, Prasanna BM, 2003. Analysis of genetics diversity in crop plants: salient statical tools and considerations. Crop Science, 43(4): 1234-1248.
  • Monteiro A, Lunn T, 1998. Trends and perspectives of vegetable brassica breeding world-wide. World Conference on Horticultural Research, Rome (Italy), June 17-20, pp: 90-96.
  • Rosa EAS, Heaney RK, Fenwick GR, Portas CAM, 1997.
  • Glucosinolates in crop plants. Horticultural Reviews, 19: 99- 215.
  • Rohlf FJ, 1992. NTSYS-pc. Numerical taxonomy and multivariate analysis system. Version 1.70. Exeter Software, Setauket, New York.
  • Rubatzky VE, Yamaguchi M, 1997. World vegetables: Principles, production, and nutritive values. Chapman & Hall, NewYork. 572 p.
  • Singh BK, Sharma SR, Kalia P, Singh B, 2010. Character association and path analysis of morphological and economic traits in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 80(2): 116-118.
  • Smith JSC, Smith OS, 1989. The description and assessment of distances between inbred lines of maize: The utility of morphological, biochemical and genetic descriptors and a scheme fort He Testing of distinctiveness between Inbred Lines. Maydica, 34: 151-161.
  • Smykal, P., Hybl, M., Corander, J., Jarkovsky, J., Flavell, A.J., Griga, M., 2008. Genetic diversity and population structure of pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties derived from combined retrotransposon, microsatellite and morphological marker analysis. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 117(3): 413-424.
  • Tanaka N, Niikura S, 2003. Characterization of early maturing F1 hybrid varieties in cabbage (Brassica oleracea L.). Breeding Science, 53(4): 325-333.
  • TÜİK 2015. Türkiye İstatistik Kurumu, Ankara.
  • UPOV 2004. Cabbage, TG/48/7. Guidelines for the conduct of tests for distinctness, uniformity and stability. International Union For The Protection of New Varieties of Plants, Geneva, 36 p.
  • Van Poppel G, Verhoeven DTH, Verhagen H, Goldbohm RA, 1999. Brassica vegetables and cancer prevention. Epidemyology and Mechanisms. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology, 472: 159-168.
  • Vasic M, Gvozdanovic-Varga J, Cervenski J, 2008. Divergence in the dry bean collection by principal component analysis (PCA). Genetics, 40(1): 23-30.
  • Viana A, Souza M, Araújo I, Corrêa R, Ahnert D, 2010. Genetic diversity in Passifora pecies determined by morphological and molecular characteristics. Biologia Plantarum, 54(3): 535- 538.
  • Vural H, Eşiyok D, Duman İ, 2000. Kültür Sebzeleri (Sebze Yetiştirme). Ege Üniversitesi Basım Evi, Bornova, İzmir. 440 s.
  • Yanmaz R, Kaplan N., Balkaya A, Apaydın A, Kar H, 2000. Türkiye’nin beyaz baş lahana (Brassica oleracea var. capitata subvar. alba) gen kaynaklarının belirlenmesi üzerinde araştırmalar. III. Sebze Tarımı Sempozyumu, 11-13 Eylül, Isparta.
  • Yousuf M, Ajmal SU, Munir M, Ghafoor A, 2011. Genetic diversity analysis for agro-morphological and seed quality traits in rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.). Pakistan Journal of Botany, 43(2): 1195-1203.
  • Zhang X, Blair MW, Wang S, 2008. Genetic diversity of Chinese common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) landraces assessed with simple sequence repeat markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 117: 629-640.
Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi-Cover
  • ISSN: 2146-0574
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 2011
  • Yayıncı: -