Liderlik ve Yönetim: Teori Var Pratik Yok?

Bu makalede 21. yüzyıldaki liderlik ve yöneticilikle ilgili yanlışların neler olduğunu sorguladım. Örneğin, uzun yıllardır yapılan araştırmalarla yönetim kuramı ve uygulamalarının yararları gösterilmesine rağmen neden hala çok sayıda kötü yönetilen kuruluş bulunmaktadır? Modern iş uygulamalarının 19. ve 20. yüzyılın bilimsel yönetiminden sapan bir dönüşüm olmadığını, fakat bunun yerine meslekleri içerecek şekilde el emeğiyle yapılan işin ötesinde, kendi kurallarını/prensiplerini genişletme olduğunu iddia etmekteyim. Bu, sağlık ve eğitim de dahil olmak üzere, daha çok sosyal yönü olan ve problemli insan kaynakları uygulamaları ile kendini gösteren bir ilişki içindedir. Bunlar, uzman yöneticiler/ liderler yerine daha eğitimsiz olanların atanmasını sağlayan iltimasçılığın çeşitli şekilleridir. Şimdi, bu eğitimsiz yöneticilerin/ liderlerin hem örgütlere/kurumlara hem de topluma getirdiği maliyetlerin ölçülmesine başlamanın zamanıdır.

Leadership and Management: All Theory No Practice?

In this paper I ask what is wrong with 21st century leadership and management. For example, why, when there exists the benefits of decades of research into management theory and practice, are so many organizations so poorly managed and led? I suggest that modern work practices are not a departure from those of the 19th and 20th century scientific management but rather an extension of their principles beyond manual work to include the professions. This is related to the corporate takeover of more social domains, including health and education, and the associated problematic human resource practices which predominate. They include various forms of favouritism which ensure the appointment of uneducated rather than expertmanagers/leaders. It is time to start measuring the cost to both organizations and society, of uneducated managers/leaders.

PDF

___

1. Bodnarczuk M. The organizational trust index as a window into organizational culture. Breckenridge Institute®, 2011. http://EzineArticles.com/?expert=Mark_Bodnarczuk 2011 (Erişim tarihi: 27/2/2012).
2. Horwath L, Koronvary P. Thoughts on the tasks of 21st century management and leadership theory. Academic and Applied Research in Military Science 2007;6(3):339-347.
3. Maccoby M. Narcissistic leaders: The incredible pros, the inevitable cons. The Harvard Business Review 2000; January-February. http://www.maccoby.com/Articles/NarLeaders.shtml (Erişim tarihi: 28/2/2012).
4. Kotter J. A force for change: How leadership differs from management. New York: Free Press; 1990.
5. Bennis W, Nanus B. Leaders: The strategies for taking charge. New York: Harper Collins; 1985.
6. Rost JC. Leadership for the twenty-first century. New York: Praeger; 1991.
7. Zaleznik A. Managers and leaders: Are they different? Harvard Business Review 2004;82(1):74-81.
8. Baldwin TT, Pierce JR, Joines RC, Farouk S. The elusiveness of applied management knowledge: a critical challenge for management educators. The Academy of Management Learning and Education 2011;10(4):583-605.
9. Harter JK, Schmidt FL, Hayes TL. Business-unit levelrelationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: Ameta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology 2002;87:268-279.
10. Tulgan B. Invisible epidemic. Business Strategy Review 2007;18(3):56-60.
11. Thompson P, McHugh D. Work organizations: a critical introduction. 3rd edition. Basingstoke: Palgrave; 2002.
12. Tozer SE, Violas PC, Senese G. School and society: Historical and contemporary perspectives. New York: McGraw Hill; 2002.
13. Scott WR, Davis GF. Organizations and organizing: Rational, natural, and open systems perspectives. USA: Pearson Educational International; 2007.
14. Alajloni MM, Almashaqba ZMS, Al-Qeed MAN. The classical theory of organization and it's relevance. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 2010;41:60-67.
15. Shafritz JM Ott JS. Classics of organizational theory. 4th ed. USA: Harcourt & Brace; 1996.
16. Luthans F. Organizational behavior. 11th ed. Irwin: McGraw-Hill; 2006.
17. Crowley M, Tope D, Chamberlain LJ, Hodson R. Neo-Taylorism at work: Occupational change in the post- Fordist era. Social Problems 2010;57(3):421-447.
18. Barry J, Chandler J, Clark H. Between the ivory tower and the academic assembly line. Journal of Management Studies 2001;38(1):87-102.
19. Parker M, Jary D. The McUniversity: Organization, management and academic subjectivity. Organization 1995;2(2):319-338.
20. Ritzer G. The McDonaldization of society. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press; 1993.
21. Hartley D. The McDonaldization of higher education: food for thought? Oxford Review of Education 1995;21:409-424.
22. DiPietro JS. Multiskilling and multidisciplinary approaches to health technologies: old concepts a new paradigm. Inquiry 1997;1:67-71.
23. Morley L, Walsh V. Feminist academics: creative agents for change. London and Pennsylvania: Taylor & Francis. 1995.
24. Bauman Z. Postmodern ethics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell; 1993.
25. Parker M Slaughter J. "Management-by-stress: The team concept in the US AutoIndustry". Science as Culture 1990;8:27-58.
26. Offermann LR, Hellmann PS. Leadership behavior and subordinate stress: A 360° view. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 1996;1:382390.
27. Townsend J, Phillips JS, Elkins TJ. Employee retaliation: The neglected consequence of poor leader-member relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology 2000;5:457-463.
28. Day RC, Hamblin R L. "Some effects of close and punitive styles of supervision." American Journal of Sociology 1964:69(5):499-510.
29. Ryan L. Ten signs you work in a fear-based workplace: Tyrannical, brown-nosers rising again- and it could hurt your company. Bloomberg Business Week. 2012. http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/38206989/ns/business-us_business/t/tensigns-you-work-fear-based-workplace/ (Erişim tarihi: 28/2/2012).
30. Lubit R. The long-term organizational impact of destructively narcissistic managers. Academy of Management Executive 2002;16(1):127-138.
31. World Bank. Report No. 24358-TU. Turkey: Reforming the health sector for improved access and efficiency. Main Report, Human Development Sector Unit, Europe and Central Asia Region. 2003.
32. Ministry of Health, Turkey Health Report. Ankara: Refik Saydam Hygiene Center School of Public Health; 2004.
33. TUSIAD Report 2005. Charting the way forward: Health care reform in Turkey. TUSIAD Publication No:T/2005-3/389.
34. Ozler NDE, BuyukarslanBA. The overall outlook of favouritism in organizations: A literature review. International Journal of Business and Management Studies 2011;3(1):275-285.
35. Arasli H, Bavik A, Ekiz EH. The effects of nepotism on human resource management. The case of three four and five star hotels in Northern Cyprus. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy 2006;26(7):295-308.
36. Keles HN, Özkan TK, Bezirci M. A study on the effects of nepotism, favoritism and cronyism on organizational trust in the auditing process in family businesses in Turkey. International Business & Economics Research Journal 2011;10(9):9-16.
37. Özler H, Ergun DÖ, Gümüştekin GE. Aile işletmelerinde nepotizmin gelişim evreleri ve kurumsallaşma. Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi 2007;17:437-450.
38. Arasli H, Tumer M. Nepotism, favoritism and cronyism: a study of their effects on job stress and job satisfaction in the Banking Industry of North Cyprus. Social Behavior and Personality 2008;36(9):1237-1250.
39. Smith G. How to achieve organizational trust within an accounting department. Managerial Auditing Journal 2005;20(5):520-523.
40. International Council of Nurses. http://www.icn.ch/pillarsprograms/leadership-for-change/ (Erişim tarihi: 28.02.2012)
41. The European Standards for Nursing and Midwifery: Information for Accession Countries. 2001. http://www.euro.who.int/document/e71868.pdf (Erişim tarihi: 28.02.2012)
42. Avci C. As nursing shortage deepens, new formula presented to Health Ministry, Todays Zaman, February 17, 2012.
43. Gök AU, Kocaman G. Reasons for leaving nursing: A study among Turkish nurses. Contemporary Nurse 2011;39(1):65-74.
44. Drucker PF. Managing the non-profit organization. Oxford: Butterworth Heinemann; 1990.