___

• Etkilerinin Belirlenmesi
• Albert, L. R. (2000). Outsıde-in-inside-out: seventh-grade students' mathematical thought processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4 1 , 1 0 9 - 1 4 1 .
• Allal, L & Ducrey, G. P. (2000). Assessment of—or in—the zone of proximal development. Learning and Instruction, 1 0 , 1 3 7 - 1 5 2 .
• Arends, R. I. (2004). Learning to teach (8th ed.). USA: McGraw-Hill.
• Baki, A. (1996). Okul matematiğinde ne öğretelim, nasıl öğretelim? Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 89, 7 2 - 7 6 .
• Baumann, A. S., Bloomfield, A. & Roughton, L. (1997). Becoming a secondary school teacher. Great Britain: Hodder and Stoughton.
• Bolte, L. A. (1999). Enhancing and assessing preservice teachers' integration and expression of mathematical knowledge. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 2,167-185.
• Cohen, L. & Manion, L. (1998). Research methods in education (4th ed.). New York: Routledge Publication.
• Countryman, J. (1992). Mat forum learning and mathematics writing math. Conutryman. htm.http://mathforum.org.
• DeVries, R. (2000). Vygotsky, Piaget and education: A reciprocal assimilation of theories and educational practices. New Ideas in Psychology, 18, 187ı 213.
• DiCamilla, F.J. & Anton, M. (1997). Repetition in the collaborative discourse of İ2 learners: A Vygotskian perspective. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 53, 609-633.
• Dibartolo, M. T. (2000). Writing opportunities as a teaching/learning tool in a college mathematics course. Doktora tezi, Columbia University.
• Goss, M., Galbraith, P. & Renshaw, P. (2002). Socially mediated metacognition: Creating collaborative zones of proximal development in small group problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 4 9 , 1 9 3 - 2 2 3 .
• Harland, T. (2003). Vygotsky's zone of proximal development and problem- based learning: linking a theoretical concept with practice through action research. Teaching in Higher Education, 8, 2 6 3 - 2 7 2 .
• Hoel, T.L. (1997). Voices from the classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13, 5 - 1 6 .
• Ercan Alasoy, $engiit Atasoy
• Howe, A. C. & Jones, L. (1998). Engaging children in science (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Printice-Hall, 175 s.
• Jurdak, M. & Zein, R.A. (1998). The effect of journal writing on achievement in and attiduates toward mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 9 8 , 4 1 2 - 4 1 9 .
• Kallman, C. (1991). The effects of journal writing on the beliefs, attitudes and achievement of elementary education students in a content course in mathematics. Doktora Tezi, Department of Instructionai Leadership and Academic Curriculum, Oklahoma, The Universty of Oklahoma.
• Nationai Numeracy Strategy, (2003). Teaching the daily mathematics lesson to children with severe or profound and multiple learning difficulties.
• Pugaiee, D. K. (2004). Acomparision of verba and written descriptions of students' problem solving processes. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 55, 2 7 - 4 7 .
• Quinn.R. J . & Wilson, M. M. (1997). Writing in the mathematics classroom: Teachers and practies. Academic Search Premier, 7 1 , 1 .
• Schurter, W.A. (2002). Comprehension monitoring: An aid to mathematical problem solving. Journal of Developmental Education, 26, 2 2 - 3 3 .
• Smagorinsky, P. (1989). The reliability and validity of protocol analysis. Written Communication, 6, 463-479.
• Stonewater, J.K. (2002). The mathematics writer's checklist: The development of a preliminary assessment tool for writing in mathematics. School Science and Mathematics, 102, 324-334.