Üç Boyutlu Belirsiz Dil Değişkenlerine Dayalı Türkiye Uzay Limanı Yer Seçimi

Askeri programlara dayalı uzay teknolojilerinin başlangıcından bu yana gelişen süreç, bu teknolojilerin çeşitli alanlarda kullanılmasını sağlamıştır. Öte yandan mevcut eğilim, bu teknolojilerin erişilebilir ve ucuz hale getirilmesinin önemini vurgulamaktadır. Kapsamlı araştırmalar, konumun faaliyetlerin maliyetini ve başarısını etkilediğini göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, Türkiye'nin uzay limanının yerini belirlemek için hibrit bir karar verme modeli önermektedir. Uzay teknolojileri Türkiye'de yeni bir konu olduğu için uzman yargıları belirsizlik içermektedir. Bulanık küme teorisi, belirsiz koşulların üstesinden gelmek için etkili bir araçtır. Bu nedenle, küresel bulanık AHP ve VIKOR yöntemlerine dayalı bir yaklaşım önerilmiştir. Kapsamlı bir literatür taraması ile 20 kriter ve beş alternatif lokasyon belirlenmiş ve değerlendirilmiştir. Sonuçlar, en önemli kriterlerin sırasıyla teknik gereksinimler, maliyet & ekonomi ve altyapı olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu kriterlere göre Türkiye uzay limanı sahası için en iyi alternatif lokasyon Somali olarak belirlenmiştir.

Spaceport Site Selection of Türkiye Based on Three-Dimensional Uncertain Linguistic Variables

Since the inception of space technologies based on military programs, the process has evolved in the direction to use these technologies in various fields. On the other hand, current trend emphasizes the importance of making these technologies accessible and inexpensive. Extensive research indicate that location affects the cost and success of activities. This study suggests a hybrid decision-making model to determine the location of spaceport of Türkiye. Since space technologies are a new subject in Türkiye, expert judgments include uncertainty. Fuzzy set theory is an efficient tool to overcome uncertain conditions. Hence, an approach based on spherical fuzzy AHP and VIKOR methods has been proposed. By a comprehensive literature review, twenty criteria and five alternative locations have been determined and evaluated. The results indicate that the most important criteria are technical requirements, cost & economy, and infrastructure, respectively. Based on these criteria, the best alternative location has been identified as Somalia for spaceport site of Türkiye.

PDF

___

[1] V. D. Kuznetsov, V. M. Sinelnikov, and S. N. Alpert, Yakov Alpert: Sputnik-1 and the first satellite ionospheric experiment. Advances in Space Research 55(12), 2833–2839 (2015).
[2] N. Garzaniti, Z. Tekic, D. Kukolj, and A. Golkar, Review of technology trends in new space missions using a patent analytics approach. Progress in Aerospace Sciences 125(5) 1-17 (2021).
[3] Tukey. Republic Of Türkiye Ministry of Industry and Technology, National Space Program, Ankara, Türkiye Space Agent; 2021. [Online]. Available: https://tua.gov.tr/en/national-space-program . [Accessed: April 26,2022].
[4] A. M. Kırık, Sayısal uydu teknolojisinin gelişimi ve Türkiye’de yayıncılığın geleceği Akademik Bakış 41(11), 6–21 (2018).
[5] K. K. Floyd and T. G. Welti, Commercial spaceports: A new frontier of infrastructure law. Environmental Law Reporter 3(3), 1–5 (2020).
[6] I. Perwitasari, Indonesia spaceport selection based on multicriteria analysis: a study on relative importance and priority regarding spaceport selection location attributes utilizing AHP, in Proc. of the 3rd International Conference on Indonesian Social & Political Enquiries (ICISPE 2018), 22-23 Oct. 2018, Semarang, Indonesia [Online]. Available https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icispe-18/125922564 [Accessed: 26 April 2022].
[7] F. Kutlu Gündoğdu and C. Kahraman, A novel spherical fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and its renewable energy application. Soft Computing 24(6), 4607–4621 (2020).
[8] K. T. Atanassov, Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1),87–96 (1986).
[9] F. Smarandache, A unifying field in logics neutrosophy: neutrosophic probability, set and logic. American Research Press, Rebooth 1–141, (1999).
[10] V. Torra, Hesitant fuzzy sets, International Journal of Intelligent Systems 25(6),529–539 (2010).
[11] B. C. Cường, Picture fuzzy sets, Journal of Computer Science and Cybernetics 30(4), 409-420 (2015).
[12] I. H. Kennedy, The Sputnik crisis and America’s response, B.A. University of Central Florida, Florida, 1999.
[13] J. N. Pelton and S. Madry, Handbook of satellite applications, Second Edition. New York: Springer, 2013.
[14] T. B. Hayward, Spaceport Hawaii: Environmental issues in AIAA Space Programs and Technologies Conference, 24-27 March 1992, Huntsville, AL, U.S.A [Online]. Available: ARC AIAA, https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.1992-1302 [Accessed April 26,2022].
[15] S. Cass and R. M. Schooff, Alternative launch site selection, in Space Congress Proceedings: Countdown to the Millennium, 27-30 April 1999, Cocoa Beach, Florida, U.S.A [Online]. Available: https://commons.erau.edu/space-congress-proceedings/proceedings-1999-36th/april-28-1999/23/ [Accessed: 26 April 2022].
[16] S. S. Balakrishnan, D. N. Moorthi, P. Venkateswara Rao, M. K. Sanyal, and D. Radhakrishnan, Satish dhawan space centre SHAR - Spaceport of India, in International Astronautical Federation - 55th International Astronautical Congress 2004, 4-8 October 2004, Vancouver, British Columbia. [Online]. Available: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.IAC-04-V.2.03. [Accessed: 26 April 2022].
[17] D. Webber, Designing the orbital space tourism experience, Rockville, Jan. 2006.
[18] C. M. Adams and G. Petrov, Spaceport master planning: Principles and precedents, San Jose, 2006.
[19] G. Wayne Finger, J. C. Kercsmar, and B. Gulliver, Evolution of the commercial aerospaceport in SpaceOps 2010, 25-30 April 2010, Alabama [Online]. Available: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2010-2149. [Accessed: 26 April 2022].
[20] G. W. Finger, D. L. Keller, and B. S. Gulliver, Public-private spaceport development. Florida, 2008.
[21] D. D. Nolek and G. W. Finger, Attracting ‘New Space’ to your spaceport. California, 2009.
[22] P. Selvidge, From airport to spaceport: Designing for an aerospace revolution. 2010. [Online]. Available: http://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/1764/
[23] B. S. Gulliver and G. W. Finger, Spaceport infrastructure cost trends, in AIAA SPACE 2014 Conference and Exposition, 4-7 August 2014, San Diego, CA [Online]. Available: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/6.2014-4397. [Accessed: 26 April 2022].
[24] G. Baxter, H. Wild, and H. Ogawa, Optimising the potential location of spaceport australia based on current suborbital space tourism requirements in 30th International Symposium on Space Technology and Science, ISTS 33rd, 4-9 July 2015, Kobe-Hyogo, Japan [Online]. Available: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/292985003_Optimising_the_Potential_Location_of_Spaceport_Australia_based_on_Current_Suborbital_Space_Tourism_Requirements. [Accessed: 25 April 2022].
[25] M. Dachyar and H. Purnomo, spaceport site selection with analytical hierarchy process decision making. Indian Journal of Science and Technology 11(10) 1–8 (2018).
[26] S. R. Diana, F. Farida, and I. Musdafia, Selection of spaceport site in indonesia: Good economic efficiency and contribution to local economic development. Researchers World: Journal of Arts, Science and Commerce 9(4), 65-76 (2018).
[27] E. Demiralay, E. H. Çopur, and T. Paksoy, Spaceport selection using a novel hybrid pythagorean fuzzy ahp & topsis based methodology: A case study of Türkiye. Journal of Aeronautics and Space Technologies 15(1), 1-17 (2022).
[28] F. Kutlu Gündoǧdu and C. Kahraman, Spherical fuzzy sets and spherical fuzzy TOPSIS method. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 36(1), 337–352 (2019).
[29] T. L. Saaty, A Scaling Method for Priorities in Hierarchical Structures, Journal 01: Mathematical Psychology 15(3) 234–281 (1977).
[30] S. Opricovic, “Multicriteria optimization of civil engineering systems,” Belgrade: Faculty of Engineering. Belgrade, pp. 1–4, 1988.
[31] F. Kutlu Gündoǧdu and C. Kahraman, A novel VIKOR method using spherical fuzzy sets and its application to warehouse site selection. Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems 37(1), 1197–1211 (2019).
[32] G. W. Finger and B. S. Gulliver, “Economic factors for launch complex development in current economy.” 48th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting Including the New Horizons Forum and Aerospace Exposition, 4 - 7 January 2010, Orlando, Florida. [Online]. Available: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/abs/10.2514/6.2010-1345. [Accessed: 26 April 2022].