PERFORMANCE EVALUATION OF PROJECTS IN SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT

BT firmaları küçük boyutlulardan büyük boyutlulara kadar farklı yazılım geliştirme projelerini geliştirme konusunda çeşitli becerilere sahiptir. Bir yazılım geliştirme projesi analiz, geliştirme ve test gibi farklı proje yönetim katmanlarından oluşabilir. Projenin performansı aynı zamanda projenin müşterisi olarak da tabir edilen proje sponsoru tarafından sürecin sonunda belirlenir. Risk, proje boyutu, proje büyüklüğü ve önceliği, ekip büyüklüğü, bütçe, süre ve değişiklik istekleri gibi faktörler projenin performansını doğrudan etkileyebilir. Bu çalışmada, söz konusu faktörlerin proje sponsorunun performans değerlendirmesine olan etkileri istatistiksel olarak analiz edilmiştir. Bunun yanında makalede proje sponsorunun performans değerlendirmesini kolaylaştırmak amacıyla bir istatistiksel model de geliştirilmiştir. Çalışmada, bir telekomünikasyon firmasının yazılım geliştirme bölümünden alınan gerçek veriler kullanılmıştır

YAZILIM GELİŞTİRME PROJELERİNDE PERFORMANS DEĞERLENDİRMESİ

IT firms are able to develop various types of software development projects from small sized projects to very large ones. A software development process is carried out by different stages of the project management such as analysis, design, development and testing. At the end of the process, performance of the project is evaluated by project sponsor who represents the customer of the project. There are different factors that effect the performance of the projects like risk, project size, project type and priority, team size, budget, duration, change requests and delays. In this study, we aim to statistically analyze effects of these factors on performance evaluation of the project sponsor. Additionally, we try to develop a statistical model to aid the project sponsor in performance evaluation. We use real data from software development department of telecommunication firm

___

  • [1] Pmbok, 2013, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide)--Fifth Edition.
  • [2] Repiso, LR, Setchi, R., Salmeron, JL, 2007, Modeling IT projects success: Emerging methodologies reviewed. Technovation. 27, 10, 582- 594.
  • [3] Reyes F, Cerpa N, Candia-Vejar A, Bardeen M, 2011, The optimization of success probability for software projects using genetic algorithms, Journal of System and Software, 84(5): 775-785.
  • [4] Standish Group, 2013 Choas manifesto 2013: Think Big, act Small.
  • [5] Agarwal, N., Rathod, U., 2006. Defining "success" for software projects: an exploratory revelation. International Journal of Project Management, 24, 358-370.
  • [6] Davis, K., 2014, Different stakeholder groups and their perceptions of project success, International Journal of Project Management, 32,189-201.
  • [7] Müller, R., Jugdev,K. ,2012, Critical success factors in projects, International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, Vol. 5 Iss 4 pp. 757 - 77.
  • [8] Atkinson, R., 1999, Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria, International Journal of Project Management, 17, 337--342.
  • [9] Pinto, J.K., Slevin, D.P., 1988, Project success: definitions and measurement techniques. Project Management Journal, 19 (1), 67-73.
  • [10] Lester, D.H., 1998, Critical success factors for new product development, Research Technology Management 41 (1), 36-43.
  • [11] Turner, J.R., 2004, Five conditions for project success, International Journal of Project Management 22 (5), 349-350.
  • [12] Turner, J.R., Zolin, R., Remington, K., 2009, "Modelling success on complex projects: multiple perspectives over multiple time frames", in: Gemuenden, H.-G. (Ed.), The Proceedings of IRNOP9, the 9th Conference of The International Research Network of Organizing by Projects, Berlin, June. Technical University of Berlin, Berlin.
  • [13] Turner, J.R., Zolin, R., 2012, Forecasting success on large projects: developing reliable scales to predict multiple perspectives by multiple stakeholders over multiple time frames, Project Management Journal 43 (5), 87-99.
  • [14] Prabhakar, G.P., 2008, What is project success: a literature review, International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 3 No. 9, pp. 3-10.
  • [15] Procaccinoa J.D., Verner J. M., 2006, Software project managers and project success: An exploratory study, The Journal of Systems and Software, 79,1541- 1551.
  • [16] Berssaneti F. T. & Carvalho M. M., 2014, Identification of variables that impact project success in Brazilian companies, International Journal of Project Management.
  • [17] Dengiz, B., C. Alabas-Uslu and O. Dengiz, 2009, Optimization of manufacturing systems using a neural network metamodel with a new training approach, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(9), 1191-1197, 2009.
  • [18] Dengiz, B., C. Alabas-Uslu. and O. Dengiz, 2009, A tabu search algorithm for the training of neural networks, Journal of the Operational Research Society, 60(2), 282-291, 2009.
  • [19] Stone, M., 1974, Cross-validatory choice and assessment of statistical predictions, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Ser. B, 36, 111-147.