Şeyma TOY, Yusuf SEÇGİN, Deniz ŞENOL, Zülal ÖNER, Abdullah RAY, İsmail MALKOÇ

Mandibula Başından Alınan Morfometrik Parametrelerin Mandibulanın Diğer Parametreleri ile Korelasyonu

Background: The mandible is a very important bone for forensic medicine, anthropology, anatomy and odontology sciences. This bone has many functions such as speaking, chewing and swallowing. This study was carried out to examine the relationship between morphometric parameters obtained from the head of the mandible and other parameters of the mandible. Materials and Methods: In our study, 45 dry mandible bones were used. These bones were photographed and measured in the Image J program. These measurements were the distance of the head of the mandible to mental foramen (right, left), the distance of the head of the mandible to angle of the mandible (right, left), the distance of the head of the mandible to gnathion (right, left), the distance of the head of the mandible to coronoid process (right, left), the distance of the head of the mandible to the mandibular notch (right, left), the distance of the head of the mandible to alveolar juga (right, left) and the distance between right and left head of the mandible. Results: While no difference was found in terms of direction in dry mandibles with correlation analysis (p>0.05), a high significant correlation was found in 18 parameters (p≤0.05). Conclusions: In our study, correlations were found between parameters obtained from the head of the mandible and other parameters of the mandible. (Amaç: Mandibula adli tıp, antropoloji, anatomi ve odontoloji bilimleri için çok önemli bir kemiktir. Bu kemiğin konuşma, çiğneme ve yutma gibi birçok işlevi vardır. Bu çalışma mandibula başından elde edilen morfometrik parametrelerin mandibulanın diğer parametreleri arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi amacıyla yapıldı. Materyal ve metod: Çalışmamızda 45 adet kuru mandibula kemiği kullanıldı. Bu kemiklerin fotoğrafları çekilerek Image J programında ölçümleri yapıldı. Bu ölçümler, mandibula başının mental foramenlere olan mesafesi (sağ, sol), mandibula başının mandibula açısına olan mesafesi (sağ, sol), mandibula başının gnathion'a olan mesafesi (sağ, sol), mandibula başının koronoid çıkıntıya olan mesafesi (sağ, sol), mandibula başının mandibular çentiğe olan mesafesi (sağ, sol), mandibula başının alveollere olan mesafesi juga (sağ, sol) ve mandibulanın sağ ve sol başı arasındaki mesafe. Bulgular: Korelasyon analizi ile kuru mandibulalarda yön açısından fark bulunmazken (p>0.05), parametreler arası ikili ve ilişkilerde ise 18 parametrede yüksek anlamlı ilişki bulundu (p≤0.05). Sonuç: Çalışmamızda mandibula başından elde edilen parametreler ile mandibulanın diğer parametreleri arasında ilişkiler bulundu.)

Anahtar Kelimeler:

Mandible, The head of the mandible, Morphometry, Dry bone, Mandibula, Mandibula Başı, Morfometri, Kuru kemik

Correlation of Morphometric Parameters Taken from the Head of the Mandible with Other Parameters of the Mandible

Keywords:

Mandible, The head of the mandible, Morphometry, Dry bone,

PDF

___

1. Susan S. Gray’s Anatomy. The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice Expert Consult: 40th ed. Philadelphia PA: Elsevier; 2008.
2. Ishwarkumar S, Pillay P, Haffajee MR, Satyapal KS. Morphometric analysis of the mandible in the Durban Metropolitan population of South Africa. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2017;76(1):82-6.
3. Arıncı K, & Elhan, A. Anatomi 1. Cilt Ankara: Güneş Kitabevi; 2001.
4. Kastamoni Y, Dursun A, Sanli OC, Yuzbasioglu N, Albay S. Morphometric Development of the Mandible in Fetal Cadavers. J Craniofac Surg. 2020;31(7):2036-9.
5. Damera A, Mohanalakhsmi J, Yellarthi PK, Rezwana BM. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular ramus for gender estimation: Retrospective study. J Forensic Dent Sci. 2016;8(2):74-8.
6. Moore KL, & Dalley, A. F. Kliniğe Yönelik Anatomi. Şahinoğlu K, editor: Nobel Tıp Kitabevleri; 2007.
7. Samanta PP, Kharb P. Morphometric analysis of mandibular foramen and incidence of accessory mandibular foramina in adult human mandibles of an Indian population. Rev Arg Anat Clin. 2013;5(2):60-6.
8. Lee S-W, Jeong H, Seo Y-K, Jeon S-K, Kim S-Y, Jang M, et al. A morphometric study on the mandibular foramen and the lingula in Korean. Korean Journal of Physical Anthropology. 2012;25(4):153-66.
9. Rupa K, Chatra L, Shenai P, Veena K, Rao P, Prabhu R, et al. Gonial angle and ramus height as sex determinants: A radiographic pilot study. Journal of Cranio-Maxillary Diseases. 2015;4(2):111-.
10. Sindel A, Öğüt E, Kastan ÖZ, Sindel M. Position, variation, and asymmetry of the mental foramen: a morphological study. European Journal of Therapeutics. 2017;23:19-23.
11. Direk F, Uysal, II, Kivrak AS, Unver Dogan N, Fazliogullari Z, Karabulut AK. Reevaluation of Mandibular Morphometry According to Age, Gender, and Side. J Craniofac Surg. 2018;29(4):1054-9.
12. KABAKCI AG, POLAT S, TAŞKIN RG, Petekkaya E, BALCI RS, Yücel AH. Bilateral foramen mentale lokalizasyonu ve processus condylaris arası uzunluğun araştırılması. Adıyaman Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2018;4(3):1028-36.
13. Kano T, Oritani S, Michiue T, Ishikawa T, Hishmat AM, Sogawa N, et al. Postmortem CT morphometry with a proposal of novel parameters for sex discrimination of the mandible using Japanese adult data. Legal Medicine. 2015;17(3):167-71.
14. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy G, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognathic surgery. Journal of Oral Surgery (American Dental Association: 1965). 1978;36(4):269-77.
15. Yassir YA. Ramus height and its relationship with skeletal and dental measurements. Journal of Oral and Dental Research. 2013;1(1):4-8.
16. Al-Shamout R, Ammoush M, Alrbata R, Al-Habahbah A. Age and gender differences in gonial angle, ramus height and bigonial width in dentate subjects. Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal. 2012;32(1).
17. Huynh NT, Morton PD, Rompre PH, Papadakis A, Remise C. Associations between sleep-disordered breathing symptoms and facial and dental morphometry, assessed with screening examinations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011;140(6):762-70.
18. Chang HP, Lin HC, Liu PH, Chang CH. Midfacial and mandibular morphometry of children with Class II and Class III malocclusions. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(9):642-7.
19. Remy F, Godio-Raboutet Y, Captier G, Burgart P, Bonnaure P, Thollon L, et al. Morphometric characterization of the very young child mandibular growth pattern: What happen before and after the deciduous dentition development? Am J Phys Anthropol. 2019;170(4):496-506.
20. Enomoto A, Watahiki J, Yamaguchi T, Irie T, Tachikawa T, Maki K. Effects of mastication on mandibular growth evaluated by microcomputed tomography. Eur J Orthod. 2010;32(1):66-70.
21. Alam MK, Alhabib S, Alzarea BK, Irshad M, Faruqi S, Sghaireen MG, et al. 3D CBCT morphometric assessment of mental foramen in Arabic population and global comparison: imperative for invasive and non-invasive procedures in mandible. Acta Odontol Scand. 2018;76(2):98-104.
22. Cartes G, Garay I, Deana NF, Navarro P, Alves N. Mandibular Canal Course and the Position of the Mental Foramen by Panoramic X-Ray in Chilean Individuals. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:2709401.
23. Vasil'ev Y, Paulsen F, Dydykin S. Anatomical and radiological features of the bone organization of the anterior part of the mandible. Ann Anat. 2020;231:151512.