Russia's Return to Central ASIA Following September 11

Bu çalışma, 11 Eylül sonrasında Rusya'nın Orta Asya politikasının değişip değişmediğini, değiştiyse hangi yönde bir değişikliğe uğradığını incelemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Çalışmada, 11 Eylül'ün hemen sonrasında Rusya "arka bahçesindeki" Amerikan varlığına ses çıkarmadıysa da, kısa bir sure sonra bu durumun Rusya'da ciddi rahatsızlıklara yol açtığı savunulmaktadır. Nitekim, İkinci Irak Savaşı'nın başlamasından günümüze kadar geçen zamanda Rusya Orta Asya'daki varlığını sağlamlaştırmak için birtakım ekonomik ve askeri araçları devreye sokmuştur. Ancak, bu çabalar Rusya'nın bölgede yeniden eski hakimiyetini sağlamasına yetecek mi bu henüz belli değildir.

11 Eylül Sonrası Rusya'nın Orta Asya Dış Politikası

The present study attempts to analyse whether Russian foreign policy towards Central Asia has altered after September 11 attacks; if it did, how it changed and what its implications for the region will be. It is argued that though immediately after 9/11 Russia welcomed American presence in- its "backyard", after a while to keep Russian pragmatism in its relations with Central Asia has been difficult. Since the war in Iraq, particularly, Russia'has launched a comprehensive effort to bring Central Asia under its control using military and economic instruments. However, whether Russia's efforts for exclusive hegemony in Central Asia will fail or succeed still remains in question.

___

  • Alibekov, I. and S. Blagov (2003), "New Security Organization Could Help Expand Russia's Reach in Central Asia", Eurasia Insight, 8 June.
  • Blank, S. (2003a), "Scramble for Central Asian Bases" 9 April, cacianalyst.org.
  • Blank, S. (2003b), "Russia's Coercive Moment In Central Asia", 14 April, http:llcacianalyst.org.
  • Blank, Stephen (2003c), "Russia's Move In Central Asia" (2003), Caucasus Analyst, 1 May.
  • Blank, Stephen (2004), "American Bases in the Former Soviet Union?" (2004), Central Asia-Caucasus Analyst, 25 February.
  • Cohen, Ariel (2003a), "Russia and Eurasia", Agenda 2003, 108.
  • Cohen , A. (2004), "Facing The Russian Rhetoric In Eurasia" (2004), 25 February, http://cacianalyst.org.
  • Cutler, R.M. (2004), "The Shanghai Cooperation Organization Moves Into First Gear", 24 March, cacianalyst.org.
  • Gvosdev, N. (2002), "Moscow Nights, Eurasian Dreams" The National Interest, Summer, 13-32.
  • Internal Russian government document (1997), Konseptsiya natsionalnoy bezopasnosti Rossiyskoy Federatsii, ukazom Prezidenta Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 17 December, no. 1300.
  • Kök, H. (1999), The Effects of the Caspian Oil Pipeline Issue on Russian Foreign Policy in the Transcaucasus Region (Unpublished PhD Thesis), University of Leeds, 42-62.
  • Lapidus, G. W. (2001), Central Asia in Russian and American Foreign Policy after September, Presentation at a Panel Discussion held at the University of California, Berkeley on October 29, http://ist-socrates.berkeley.edu/~bsp/caucasus/articles/lapidus_2001-1029.pdf.
  • Theses of the Council on Foreign and Defense Policy, New Security Challenges and Russia (2003), http://eng.globalisation.ru/live/article.asp7rubric_id=1616&id=1650.
  • Torbakov, I. (2003), "Disparate Interest Groups Grapple To Shape Russian Foreign Policy" Eurasia Insight, http://www.eurasianet.org/departments/insight/articles/eav090902_pr.shtm.
  • Trifonov, D. (2003), "Ivanov Doctrine' Reflects Moscow's Growing Confidence In The CIS And Beyond" 19 November, cacianalyst.org.
  • Wallander, C.A. (2002), "Russian Foreign Policy: The Implications of Pragmatism for U.S. Policy" Congressional Testimony at Europe Subcommittee of the House Committee on International Relations, 27 February, http://www.csis.org/hill/ts020227wallander.htm.
  • Zviagelskaia, I. (1995), The Russian Policy Debate on Central Asia, RIIA: London.