Örgüt-Çevre İlişkisinde Yeni Perspektif Arayışı: Dinamik Örgütsel Çevre ve Örgütsel Doku

Bu çalışmada, örgüt-çevre ilişkisini açıklamada, kurumsalcı kuram, kaynak bağımlılığı kuramı ve nüfus ekolojisi kuramı sentezlenmeye çalışılmıştır. Sentezleme çabasının bir sonucu olarak kuramların tek başlarına örgüt-çevre ilişkisini açıklamada önemli eksiklikleri bulunduğu, bir arada düşünüldüklerinde de örgüt-çevre ilişkisine tek yönlü ve dışarıdan baktıkları için tam anlamıyla açıklayıcı olamadıkları görülmüştür. Bu konudaki eksikliği gidermek ve örgüt-çevre ilişkisine başka bir perspektiften, yani örgütün içerisinden bakmak amacıyla dinamik örgütsel çevre ve örgütsel doku kavramları önerilmiş ve tartışılmıştır. Bu kavramların, örgüt-çevre ilişkisini açıklamaya yardımcı olacağı sonucuna varılmıştır.

In the Searh of New Perspective for Organization-Environment Relationship: Dynamic Organizational Environment and Organizational Texture

In this study, institutional theory, resource dependency and population ecology theories are strived'to be synthesized for a better explaination of organization-environment relationship. As a result of the effort for synthesizing these theories, it has been argued that they have critical deficiencies in explaining organization-environment relationship, and they even can not supplement each other in this respect totally. In order to fill the gap that these theories could not, an inner perspective is considered to be appropriate for explaining organization-environment relationship, and two concepts, namely "dynamic organizational environment" and "organizational texture" are proposed and discussed. They are thought to be helpful in explaining the given relationship.

___

  • Astley, W.G. ve A.H. Van de Ven (1983), "Central Perspectives and Debates in Organization Theory", Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 245-273.
  • Burns, T. ve G. M. Stalker (1994), The Management of Innovation, London: Oxford University Press.
  • Daft, Richard L. (1998), Organization Theory and Design, (6th ed.), Cincinnati: Southwestern College Publishing.
  • DiMaggio, P.J. ve W.W. Powell (1983) "Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields", American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
  • DiMaggio, P.J. ve W. W. Powell (1991), "Introduction" Powell ve DiMaggio (der.) The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis içinde, Chicago: University of Chicago Press., 1-38.
  • Emery, Fred E. ve E.L. Trist. (1965) "The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments", Human Relations, 18,21-32.
  • Harman, M.T. ve J. Freeman (1977), "The Population Ecology of Organization" American Journal of Sociology, 82, 929-964.
  • Larson, M. S. (1977), The Rise of Professionalism, Berkeley: University of California Pres.
  • March, J.G. (1991), "Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning" . Organization Science, 2, 71-87.
  • Meyer, J. W. ve B. Rowan (1977), "Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony", American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
  • Meyer, J.W., W.R. Scott ve T.E. Deal (1981) "Institutional and Technical Sources of Organizational Structure: Explaining the Structure of Educational Organizations", D. Stein (der.) Organization and the Human Services: Cross Disciplinary Reflections içinde, Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 151-179.
  • Mizruchi, M.S. (1999), "The Social Construction of Organizational Knowledge: A Study of the Uses of Coercive, Mimetic, and Normative Isomorphism" Administrative Science Quarterly, December Issue.
  • Morgan, G. (1980), "Paradigms, Metaphors, and Puzzle Solving in Organization Theory", Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 605-622.
  • Özen, Ş. (2002), "Bağlam, Aktör, Söylem Ve Kurumsal Değişim: Türkiye'de Toplam Kalite Yönetiminin Yayılım Süreci", Yönetim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(2), 47-90.
  • Pfeffer, J., & G.R. Salancik, (1978), The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York: Harper & Row.
  • Scott, W.R. (1987), Organizations: Rational, natural and Open Systems, (2nd ed.) New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Selznick, P. (1966), TVA and The Grass Roots : A Study in the Sociology of Formal organization, New York: Harper and Row.
  • Thompson, J. D. (1967), Organization in Action, New York: McGraw-Hill.