Sayfa uzunluğu farklı hiperortamların öğrenme performansı ve memnuniyete etkisi

Bu araştırmada, öğrenme amaçlı hiperortamların sayfa uzunluğunun, üniversite öğrencilerinin öğrenme performanslarına (başarı, çalışma ve test süresi) ve ortamla ilgili memnuniyete etkisi incelenmiştir. Araştırma YTÜ Eğitim Fakültesinde öğrenim gören 127 lisans öğrencisi üzerinde ve deneysel işlemde kullanılmak üzere sayfaları uzun ve kısa olmak üzere araştırmacılarca geliştirilmiş iki farklı hiperortamda gerçekleştirilmiştir. Hiperortamda sunulan Beyne Dayalı Öğrenme konulu içerik, çoktan seçmeli başarı testi ve hiperortamla ilgili görüş anketi araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilmiştir. İstatistik analizler için bağımsız grup t-testi ve Mann-Whitney-U testi kullanılmıştır. Bulgular, sayfa uzunluğunun öğrencilerin öğrenme performanslarını ve hiperortamla ilgili görüşlerini etkilemediğini göstermiştir. Bu bulgu, bilgisayar-destekli ve Web-tabanlı öğretim materyallerinde alışılmış bir uygulama olan, sayfaları kısa tasarlama yaklaşımının üniversite öğrencileri için bir gereklilik olmadığını göstermiştir.

Effect of different hypermedia page lengths on learning performance and satisfaction

This study investigated the learning performance and opinions of university students on hypermedia with different page lengths. The subjects were 127 undergraduate students from the Faculty of Education, YTU. Two hypermedia, one with long and the other with short pages, were designed by the researchers. The content presented on these hypermedia, the multiple choice test and a questionnaire to collect the opinions were also developed by the researchers. To analyze the findings independent group t-test and Mann-Whitney-U tests were utilized. Major finding of the study is that the page length did not affect the learning achievement of students. All students did well on both short and long page conditions, also they were all happy with the page length they worked on. This shows that designing computer-assisted or Web-based instructional materials with short pages as eveybody got used to is not a necessity for the university students.

___

  • Alessi, S. M. ve Trollip, S. R. (2001). Multimedia for learning: methods and development (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Alomyan, H. (2004). Individual differences: Implications for web-based learning design. International Education Journal, 4 (3). 27.04.2006 tarihinde http://ehlt.flinders.edu.au/education/iej/articles/v4n4/alomyan2/paper.pdf adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Ayersman, D. J. (1996). Reviewing the research on hypermedia-based learning. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 28 (4), 500-525.
  • Baker, J. R. (2003). The impact of paging vs. scrolling on reading online text passages. Usability News, 5.1. 27.04.2006 tarihinde http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/51/paging_scrolling.htm adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Bernard, M., Baker, R. ve Fernandez, M. (2002). Paging vs. scrolling: looking for the best way to present search results. Usability News, 4.1. 27.04.2006 tarihinde http://psychology.wichita.edu/surl/usabilitynews/41/paging.htm adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Boles, W., Pillay, H. ve Raj, L. (1999). Matching cognitive styles to computer-based instruction: an approach for enhancing learning in electrical engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 24 (4), 371-83.
  • Calcaterra, A. ve Alessandro, J. U. (2005). Cognitive style, hypermedia navigation and learning. Computers & Education, 44 (4), 441-457.
  • Chen, S. (2002). A cognitive model for non-linear learning in hypermedia programmes. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33 (4), 449-460.
  • Chou, C. (1999). Developing hypertext-based learning courseware for computer networks: the macro and micro stages. IEEE Transactions on Education, 42 (1).
  • Dillon, A. ve Zhu, E. (1997). Designing Web-Based Instruction: A human-computer ınteraction perspective. (edit. Badrul Khan) Web-Based Instruction (s.221-224). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Dünser, A. ve Jirasko, M. (2005). Interaction of hypertext forms and global versus sequential learning styles. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32 (1), 79-91.
  • Dyson, M. C. ve Kipping, G. J. (1998). The effects of line length and method of movement on patterns of reading from screen. Visible Language, 32 (2), 150-180.
  • Dywer, F. M. ve Moore, D. M. (2001). The effect of gender, field dependence and color-coding on student achievement of different educational objectives. International Journal of Instructional Media New York, 28 (3), 309-318.
  • Ford, N. ve Chen, S. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: an empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9 (4), 281-311.
  • Ford, N. ve Chen, S. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: an empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52 (1), 5-22.
  • Ford, N., Wilson, T. D., Foster, A. Ellis, D. ve Spink, A. (2002). information seeking and mediated searching. part 4. cognitive styles in information seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53 (9).
  • Graff, M. (2003). Learning from web-based instructional systems and cognitive style. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34 (4), 407-418.
  • Graff, M. (2005). differences in concept mapping, hypertext architecture, and the analyst-intuition dimension of cognitive style. Educational Psychology, 25 (4), 409-422.
  • Hsu, T. E. (1994). effects of learner cognitive styles and metacognitive tools on ınformation acquisition paths and learning ın hyperspace environments. National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology Kongresi, 1994. 16. 20.02.1994 tarihinde http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?accno=ED373721 adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Kılıç, E. ve Karadeniz, Ş. (2004). Cinsiyet ve öğrenme tarzının dolaşma stratejisi ve başarıya etkisi. Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 24 (3), 129-146.
  • Kim, K. (1998). Information seeking behavior on the world wide web: Effects of cognitive style, online database search experience and task types on search performance. The University of Texas, Austin, yayımlanmamış doktora tezi.
  • Kim, K. (2001). Implications of user characteristics in information seeking on the world wide web. International Journal of Human-Computer Ineraction, 13(3), 323-340.
  • Kim, K ve Allen, B. (2002). Cognitive and task influences on web searching behavior. Journal of the American Society for Information Science & Technology, 53 (2), 109-119.
  • Lee, M. J. ve Harvey, F. A. (1999). the relationship between navigational patterns and ınformation processing styles of hypermedia users. International Journal of Educational Technology, 1 (1), 235-261.
  • Leong, S. C. ve Al-Hawamdesh, S. (1999). Gender and learning attitudes in using web-based science lessons. Information Research, 5 (1). 12.11.2005 tarihinde www.shef.ac.uk/~is/publications/infres/paper66.html adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Liu, M. W. ve Reed, M. (1994, Şubat). The relationship between the learning strategies and learning styles ın a hypermedia environment. Annual Conference of Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, Nasville.
  • Liu, M, ve Bera, S. (2005). an analysis of cognitive tool use patterns in a hypermedia learning environment. Educational Technology Research and Developmen, 53 (1), 5-21.
  • Mills, C. B. ve Weldon, L. J. (1986). Reading text from computer secreens. ACM Computing Surveys, 19, 329-358.
  • Mitchell, T. F., Chen, S. ve Macredie, R. D. (2005). Hypermedia learning and prior knowledge: domain expertise vs system expertise. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21 (1), 53-64.
  • Nielsen, J. (1997). Changes in web usability since 1994. 16.03.2006 tarihinde http://www.useit.com/alertbox/9712a.html adresinden alınmıştır.
  • Newby, T. J., Stepich, D., Lehman, J. ve Russell, J. (2000). Instructional technology for teaching and learning. desiging ınstruction, ıntegrating computers, and using media. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc.
  • Palmquist, R. A. ve Kim, K. (2000). Cognitive style and online database search experience as predictors of web search performance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51, 6, 558-566.
  • Piolat, A., Roussey, J. Y. veThunin, O. (1997). Effects of screen presentation on text reading and revising. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 47, 565-589
  • Romiszowski, A. J. (1997). Web-based distance learning and teaching: revolutionary invention or reaction to necessity? (edit. Badrul Khan) Web-Based Instruction (s.25-40). New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
  • Sabry, K. ve Baldwin, L. (2003). Web-based learning interaction and learning styles. British Journal of Educational Technolog, 34 (4), 443-454.
  • Schwarz, E., Beldie, I. P., ve Pastoor, S. (1983). A Comparison of Paging and Scrolling For Changing Screen Contents By Inexperienced Users. Human Factor, 24, 279-282.
  • Shannon, R. The history of the net. 17.03.2006 tarihinde http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/starthere/historyofthenet.html adresinden alınmıştır.