Kimya öğretmen adaylarının yapılandırmacı öğrenme ortamı oluşturmaya yönelik tercihlerinin incelenmesi

Bu çalışmanın amacı kimya öğretmen adaylarının gelecekte yapılandırmacı öğrenme ortamı oluşturmaya yönelik tercihlerini belirlemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Yapılandırmacı Öğrenme Ortamı Ölçeği (YÖOÖ) öğretmen adayları için Türkçe'ye uyarlanmış ve geçerlik çalışması doğrulayıcı ve açıklayıcı faktör analizleri kullanılarak yapılmıştır. Veri analizi LISREL 8.71 ve SPSS 15. 0 programları kullanılarak gerçekleştirilmiştir. Sonuçlar beş faktörlü ölçeğin yapısını desteklemektedir. Ayrıca, her bir alt boyutun güvenirlik değerleri yeterince yüksektir. YÖOÖ' nün geçerli ve güvenilir Türkçe formunun kimya öğretmen adaylarına uygulanması sonucu "düşüncelerini serbestçe ifade etmeyi öğrenme" alt boyutunda en yüksek ortalama değeri gözlenmiştir (25.44). Dünya hakkında öğrenme (24.94) ve iletişim kurmayı öğrenme (24.33) alt boyutlarının ortalama değerleri öğrenmeyi öğrenme (22.12) ve fen hakkında öğrenme (21.07) alt boyutlarının ortalama değerlerinden daha yüksektir. Sonuçlar tartışılmış ve öğretmen eğitimi için öneriler sunulmuştur.

Examination of Pre-service chemistry teachers’ preferences for creating Constructivist learning environment

The purpose of the study was to examine pre-service chemistry teachers' preferences for creating constructivist learning environment in their future class. For the specified purpose, Constructivist Learning Environment Scale (CLES) was adapted to Turkish and validated for pre-service chemistry teachers by conducting Confirmatory and Exploratory Factor Analyses. The data analyses were carried out utilizing LISREL 8.71 and SPSS 15.0 programs. Results supported 5-factor structure of CLES. Moreover, Cronbach's alpha value for each scale was found to be sufficiently high. Administration of Turkish version of the CLES as a valid and reliable instrument revealed that learning to speak out subscale of the CLES had the highest mean value (M=25.44). The mean of learn about the world (M=24.94), and learn to communicate (M= 24.33) subscales were higher than that of learn to learn (M=22.12) and learn about science (M= 21.07) subscales. Discussion of the results and suggestions for teacher education were provided.

___

  • Abd-El-Khalick, F., Bell, R. L., & Lederman, N.G. (1998). The nature of science and instructional practice: Making the unnatural natural. Science Education, 82, 417-437.
  • Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2005). Developing deeper understandings of nature of science: The impact of a philosophy of science course on preservice science teachers' views and instructional planning. International Journal of Science Education, 27, 15-42.
  • Acat, M. B., Anılan, H., & Anagun, S. S. (2010) The problems encountered in designing constructivist learning environments in science education and practical suggestions. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology (TOJET), 9(2), 212-220.
  • Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., Taylor, P. C., & Chen, C. C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 22, 37-55.
  • Arbuckle, J. L. & Wothke, W. (1999). Amos 4.0 user 's guide. Chicago, IL: SPSS.
  • Arısoy,N. (2007). Examining 8 Grade Students' Perception of Learning Environment of Science Classrooms in Relation to Motivational Beliefs and Attitudes. Unpublished Master Thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
  • Driscoll, M.P. (2005). Psychology of learning for instruction. Toronto: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Dryden, M., & Fraser, B. J. (1998, April). The impact of systemic reform efforts on instruction in high school classes. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
  • Duit, R. & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Learning in science-from Behaviorism towards social constructivism and beyond. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, (pp.3-25). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Fisher, D.L. & Fraser, B.J. (1981). Validity and use of My Class Inventory. Science Education, 65, 145-156.
  • Frankel, J.R., & Wallen, N.E. (2006). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. (6th ed.) The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc.
  • Fraser, B.J. (1990). Individualized Classroom Environment Questionnaire. Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.
  • Fraser, B. J. (1998). Science learning environments: Assessment, effects and determinants. In B.J. Fraser & K.G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, (pp.527-564). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Fraser, B. J. (2001). Twenty thousand hours: Editor's instruction. Learning Environments Research, 4, 1-5.
  • Fraser, B. J. (2007). Research on science teacher knowledge. In Abell, S. K & Lederman, N.G. Handbook of Research on Science Education, (pp. 103-124). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Fraser, B. J., McRobbie, C. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1996, April). Development, validation and use of personal and class forms of a new classroom environment instrument. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
  • Fraser, B. & Wubbels, T. (1995). Classroom learning environments. In B. Fraser & H. J. Walberg (Eds.), Improving science education, (pp. 117-143). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (1993). Translating achievement tests for use in cross-national studies. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 9, 57-68.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issuses, designs and technical guidelines for adapting tests into multiple languages and cultures. In Hambleton, R.K., Merenda, P., & Pielberger, C. (Eds). Adapting educational and psychological tests for cross-cultural assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Hambleton, R.K. & Bollwark, J. (1991). Adapting tests for use in different cultures: Technical issues and methods. Bulletin of the International Testing Commission, 18, 3-32.
  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. New York: The Guildford Press.
  • Lederman, N. G. (2007). Nature of Science: Past, present and future. In S. K. Abell, & N. G. Lederman (Eds), Handbook of Research on Science Education, (pp.831-879). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  • Lee, S., & Taylor, P. (2001, December). The cultural adaptability of the CLES: A Korean perspective. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Fremantle, Australia.
  • McRobbie, C. J., & Fraser, B. J. (1993). Association between student outcomes and psychosocial science environments. Journal of Educational Research, 87,78-85.
  • Moos, R.H. (1979). Evaluating educational environments: Procedure^, measures, findings and policy implications. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • National Ministry of Education (2006). Science and Technology Course Program $(6^{th} , 7^{th}, and 8^{th}$ Grades). Ankara: National Ministry of Education Publications.
  • Ozsoy, G. & Günindi ,Y. (2011). Prospective preschool teachers' metacognitive awareness. Elementary Education Online, 10(2), 430-440.
  • Simpson, R. D., & Oliver, J. S. (1990). A summary of major influences on attitude toward and achievement in science among adolescent students. Science Education 74,1-18.
  • Taylor, P. C., & Fraser, B. J. (1991, April). Development of an instrument for assessing constructivist learning environments. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
  • Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27, 293-302.
  • Tobin, K. & Fraser, B. J. (1998). Qualitative and quantitative landscapes of classroom learning environments. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education, (pp.623-640). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.
  • Walberg, H.J. & Anderson, G.J. (1968). Classroom climate and individual learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 414-419.
  • Wilson, B.G. (1996). Introduction: What is a constructivist learning environment? In B.G. Wilson (Ed:). Constructivist Learning Environments (pp.3-8). Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Educational Technology Publications.