Exploring motivational constructs in foreign language reading

Bu makale, öğrencilerin yabancı dilde okumaya karşı motivasyon ve tutumlarını araştırmak için geliştiren bir aracı tanıtmaktadır. Aracı geliştirmek için öncelikle, 123 öğrenciye yabancı dilde okumaya karşı duyuşsal tepkilerini tespit etmeye yönelik bir dizi açık uçlu soru sorulmuştur. Elde edilen nitel verinin içerik analizi, 51 soruluk bir ön ölçeği ortaya çıkartmıştır. Bu ölçek, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesinde yabancı dil öğrenimi gören 443 öğrenciye uygulanmıştır. Yapılan faktör analizi, öğrencilerin yabancı dilde okumaya karşı motivasyon ve tutumlarındaki varyansın %58.70’ini açıklayan dört faktör ortaya çıkartmıştır. Bu faktörler, okumanın içsel değeri, okumanın dışsal değeri, okuma yeterliği ve yabancı dil gelişiminde okumanın yeri olarak adlandırılmıştır. Ortaya çıkan faktör yapıları genel olarak anadilde okuma motivasyonu teorileriyle örtüşmekle beraber, yabancı dil öğrencilerinin okumayı dil gelişimi için bir araç olarak gördüklerine işaret eden yeni bir öge de ortaya çıkarmıştır.

Yabancı dilde okumaya karşı motivasyonel yapıların incelenmesi

This article introduces an instrument that has been developed to explore motivation and attitudes of students towards reading in a foreign language (FL). To develop the instrument, initially 123 students were asked a set of qualitative questions to determine their affective reactions to reading in a FL. A content analysis of emergent data yielded an initial 51-item scale. This scale was administered to 443 FL students at Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University in Turkey. A factor analysis revealed four factors accounting for 58.70 % of variance in students’ attitudes and motivation towards reading in a FL. These were named as intrinsic value of reading, extrinsic utility value of reading, reading efficacy, and foreign language linguistic utility. The factorial constructs generally overlapped with current theories of reading motivation in the mother tongue with an extra element indicating that reading in a FL is viewed as a linguistic resource for developing language proficiency by foreign language learners.

___

  • Alderson, J. C. (2000). Assessing reading. NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Anderson, N. J. (1999). Exploring second language reading: Issues and strategies. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioural change. Pschological Review, 84, 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1989). Human Agency in Social Cognitive Theory. American Psychologist. Vol. 44, No:9, 1175-1184.
  • Brantmeier, C. (2006). Toward a multicomponent model of interest and L2 reading: sources of interest, perceived situational interest, and comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18 (2), 89-115.
  • Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Pres.
  • Carrell, P. L., & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 17,553-573.
  • Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviour. New York: Plenum.
  • Dornyei, Z. (2003). Attitudes, orientations, and motivations in language learning: Advances in theory, research and applications. Language Learning, 53(1), 3-32.
  • Dörnyei, Z. (2005). The psychology of the language learner: Individual differences in second language acquisition. Mahwah, NJ: Ealbaum.
  • Eccles, J.S., Lord, S., Midgley, C. (1991) What are we doing to early adolescents? The impact of educational contexts on early adolescents. American Journal of Education. 99, 521-542.
  • Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (1995). In the mind of the actor: the structure of adolescents achievement task values and expectancy-related believes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 215-225.
  • Eccles, J.S., Adler, T,F., Futterman, R., Goff, S.B., Kaczala, C.M., Meece, J., and Midley, C. (1983) Expectancies, values and academic behaviors. In J.T. Spence (Ed.) Achievement and achievement motives (pp 75-146). San Francisco: Freeman.
  • Eccles, J. S. & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132.
  • Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention. And Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Gardner, R. C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning. London: Edward Arnold.
  • Gömleksiz, M. N. (2004). Validity and reliability of an attitude scale towards reading habit. Fırat University Journal of Social Sciences, 14 (2), 185-195.
  • Grabe, W. & Stoller, L. F. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow: Pearson Education.
  • Grabe, W. (2004). Research on teaching reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 44-699.
  • Hatch, E. and Lazaraton, A. (1991). The Research Manual. Design and Statistics for Applied Linguistics. Boston, Massachusetts: Heinle and Heinle Publishers.
  • Kondo-Brown, K. (2006). Affective variables and Japanese L2 reading ability. Reading in a Foreign Language, 18 (1), 55-71.
  • Mori. S. (2002). Redefining motivation to read in a foreign language. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14(2), 91-110.
  • Nassaji, H. (2002). Schema theory and knowledge-based processes in second language reading comprehension: a need for alternative perspectives. Language Learning, 52, 439-481.
  • Reeves, C. (2002). Literacy attitudes: theoretical perspectives. Paper presented at the 19th World Congress on Reading, Edinburg, Scotland.
  • Rosenberg, M.J. (1956). Cognitive structure and attitudinal affect. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 53, 367-372.
  • Rotter, J.B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
  • Shechtman, Z. (2002). Validation of the Democratic Teacher Belief Scale (DTBS). Assessment in Education, Vol. 9, No. 3., 364-377.
  • Schutte, N. S. & Malouff, J. M. (2007). Dimensions of reading motivation: development of an adult reading motivation scale. Reading Psychology, 28 (5), 469 – 489.
  • Şencan, G. (2005). Sosyal ve davranışsal ölçümlerde güvenilirlik ve geçerlilik (Reliability and validity in social and behavioural measurements). Ankara: Seçkin.
  • Tavşancıl, E. (2001). Tutumların Ölçülmesi ve SPSS ile Veri Analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık
  • Tezbaşaran, A. (1997) Validity issues of a likert type scale: a case study. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13, 41-45.
  • Thurstone, L.L. (1946). Comment. American Journal of Sociology, 52, 39-40.
  • Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: a developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review. 6, 49-78.
  • Wigfield, A. & Eccles, J.S. (1992). The development of achievement task values: a theoretical analysis. Developmental Review. 12, 265-310.
  • Wigfield, A. & Guthrie, J. T. (1995). Dimensions of children’s motivations for reading: An initial study (Research Rep. No. 34). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center.
  • Wigfield, A. & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89 (3), 420-432.
  • Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy value theory of achievement motivation: A theoretical perspective. Educational Psychological Review, 6, 49-78.
  • Yamashita, J. (2004). Reading attitudes in L1 and L2, and their influence on L2 extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 16(1), 1-19).