Teacher leadership and school effectiveness in the primary schools of maldives

Bu çalışmanın amacı öğretmen liderliğinin okul etkiliği üzerindeki etkilerini incelemektir. Araştırmanın örneklemini Male’de (Maldivlerin Başkenti) yer alan altı ilköğretim okulundan seçilen 181 öğretmen oluşturmuştur. Veri toplama aracı olarak araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen bir bilgi toplama aracı kullanılmıştır. Okul etkiliği ile öğretmen liderliğinin her boyutu için anlamlı bir ilişki olduğunu daha önceki araştırma bulguları ortaya koymuştur. Verilerin çoklu regresyon analizi ile ilcelenmesi sonucu öğretmen liderliğini belirleyen yedi boyuttan otonomi boyutunun okul etkiliğinn % 47.1’lik kısmını açıklayan birinci yordayıcı olduğu belirlenmiştir. Buna karşın, olumlu çevre boyutu, % 6,5lik, açık iletişim boyutu da % 2,9’luk bir katkı yaptıkları belirlenmiştir. Bu çalışma ile öğretmen liderliğinin okul başarısının % 56,5’lik kısmını açıkladığını belirlenmiştir. Elde edilen bulguların, öğretmenlere, okul yöneticilerine ve eğitim bakanlığı’na okul etkiliğini artırmada öğretmen liderliği özelliklerini geliştirme konusunda nasıl çalışabilecekleri konusunda katkı getirdiği düşünülmektedir.

Maldivler temel eğitim okullarında öğretmen liderliği ve okul etkililiği

The aim of this research is to study the impact of teacher leadership on the school effectiveness. A total of 181 teachers from six primary schools in Male (the capital island of Maldives) were chosen as respondents for this study. A quantitative survey method using questionnaire to obtain the data is employed. The findings showed there is a significant relationship between each dimension of teacher leadership and school effectiveness. Multiple regression analysis showed that among the seven dimensions of teacher leadership, autonomy dimension contributes 47.1% to school effectiveness and become the most significant predictor. However, the other two dimensions include positive environment dimension which contribute 6.5% while open communication dimension contribute 2.9% to school effectiveness. The overall findings indicated that there is 56.5% impact of teacher leadership on school effectiveness. This study indicates the importance of studying teacher leadership on school effectiveness as the information collected would help teachers, principals and the education ministry to plan, implement, access and maintain high level of teacher leadership which in turn to promote higher level of school effectiveness.

___

  • Blasé, J. and Blasé, J. (1998). Handbook of instructional leadership: How really good principal promote teaching and learning. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Brookover, S. (1997). The effects of school characteristics on student academic performance. Merill Prentice Hall: Pearson Education Inc.
  • Gay, L.R. Mills, Geoffery, E. Airasian, P. (2006). Educational research; Competencies for analysis and application. Merrill Prentice Hall: Pearson Education Inc.
  • Gehrke, N. (1991). Developing teachers’ leadership skills. ERIC Digest ED330691
  • Glickman, C.D., Gordon, P.S. and Gordon, R.J. (2001). Supervision and instructional leadership: A developmental approach (5th ed). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
  • Grangeat, M., Gray, P., & France, P.M. (2008). Teaching as a collective work analysis, current research and implications for teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching 34(3): 177-189.
  • Harcher, R.L. and Hyle A.E. (1996). Collaborative power: A grounded theory of administrative instructional leadership in the elementary school. Journal of Educational Administration 34(3): 15-29.
  • Harris, B.M., McIntyre, E.K., Jr Littleton, C.V. and Long, F.D. (1985). Personnel administration in education: Leadership for instructional improvement. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon, Inc.
  • Harris, A & Mujis, D (2003). Raising attainment in schools in challenging context. possibility and reality? Journal of School Effectiveness and Improvement, 1(2): 23-35.
  • Hinkle, D. E., Wiersma, W. & Jurs, S.G. (2003). Applied statistic for the behavioural sciences (5th ed). Bodton: Houghton Miffin Company.
  • Hook, D.P., (2006). The impact of teacher leadership on school effectiveness in selected exemplary secondary schools. Retrieved July 30, 2007, from http://txspace.tamu.edu/bitstream/handle/ 1969.1/3740/etd-tamu-2006A-EDAD Hook.pdf?sequence=1
  • Huerta. J, Watt, K.M. & Alkan, E. (2008). Exploring the relationship between AVID professional development and teacher leadership. Academic Leadership Journal 6(1): 20-32.
  • Katzenmeyer, M., and Moller, G. (2001). Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders. Crown Press. Retrieved April 13, 2008, from http://books.google.com.my/books
  • Mastrangelo, A., Eddy, E.R. and Lorenzet, S.J. (2004). The importance of personal and professional leadership. The Leadership and Development Journal 25(5): 431-51.
  • McEwan, E.K. (1998). Seven steps to effective instructional leadership. Thousands Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  • Ministry of Education, Republic of the Maldives. (2003). Retrieved May 9, 2007, from http://www.moe.gov.my/
  • Mortimore, P. (1998). The road to improvement: Reflections on school effectiveness. Published by Taylor & Francis. Retrieved August 2, 2008, from http://books.google.com.my
  • myMaldives. (2007). Retrieved May 9, 2007, from http://www.mymaldives.com/
  • Nkobi O. P. (2008). Instructional leadership for quality learning – An assessment of the impact of the primary school management department project in Botswana. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 36(4): 471- 494.
  • Pounder, J.S. (2003). Employing transformational leadership to enhance the quality of management development instruction. Journal of Management Development 22(1): 6-13.
  • Republic of Maldives – Ministry of Education (2000). Policy directions for the future: The EFA 200 assessment: Country report. Retrieved August 10, 2008, from http://www.unesco.org/ education/wed/countryreports/maldives/rapport_3.html.
  • Seifert, H.E. and Vornberg, J.A. (2002). The new school leader for the 21st century: The principal. Lanham: The Scarecrow Press.
  • Siduna, A.V. (2003). Primary school management development project: Final report. Gaborone: Department of Teacher Training and Development – Botswana.
  • Suzuki, S. (2008). Global learning. Journal of Education for Teaching 34(4): 235-244.
  • Suzuki, S. (1998). Toward redefinition of teaching job. Issues and Prospects of Teacher Education, ed. S. Suzuki 163-201. Tokyo: Gakubun-Sha.
  • Taylor, L., & Bogotch, I.E. (1994). School level effects of teachers’ participation in decision making. Journal of School Leadership, 7, 609-628
  • Townsend, W. (2004). School effectiveness framework. Retrieved September 30, 2007, from www.griffith.edu.au /__data /assets /pdf _file/0009/40959/lm-2003-2-2.pdf
  • Webb, R. (2005). Leading teaching and learning in the primary school: From educative leadership to pedagogical leadership. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 33(1): 69-91
  • York-Barr, J., & Duke, K. (2005). What does research tell about teacher leadership (Research brief). Retrieved September 30, 2007], from www.centerforcsri.org