Determination of Biochemical Profile of Bilecik Propolis

Önemli bir arı ürünü olan propolis antioksidan, antimikrobiyal, antitumoral, antiinflamatuar özellikleri nedeniyle apiterapi uygulamalarında ve günlük yaşamda gıda takviyesi olarak kullanılmaktadır. Propolisin özellikleri elde edildiği bölgeye, toplanma biçimine ve toplanma zamanına bağlı olarak değiştiğinden her kovandan veya bölgeden aynı özelliklere sahip propolis eldesi mümkün olmamaktadır. Yapılan bu çalışmayla Marmara Bölgesinde yer alan Bilecik ilinden temin edilen ham propolis örneklerinin biyokimyasal özellikleri belirlendi. Meşe, kayın, köknar, ıhlamur, kestane ağaçları ile çevrili olan Bilecik orman bakımından oldukça zengindir. Bu nedenle de zengin bir floraya sahiptir. Bu amaçla; %70’lik etil alkol çözeltisi kullanılarak ham propolislerden etanolik propolis özütleri hazırlandı. Hazırlanan propolis ekstraktlarının balsam miktarı, vaks miktarı, toplam polifenol miktarı ve toplam flavonoid miktarı belirlendi. GC/MS kullanılarak ham propolislerin içerdiği bileşenler tespit edildi. Propolis için önemli bir değer olan balsam miktarının % 13 ile %52 arasında değiştiği; toplam polifenol miktarının ise 11 mg GAE/mL ile 76 mg GAE/mL arasında değiştiği belirlendi. Propolis örneklerinin aldehitler, alifatik asit ve esterler, alkoller, hidrokarbonlar, karboksilik asit esterleri, ketonlar, terpenler, yağ asitleri ve diğer bileşenler bakımından zengin olduğu belirlendi. 

___

  • 1. M. R., Ahn, S., Kumazawa, Y., Usui, J., Nakamura, M.,Matsuka, F. Zhu, and Nakayama, T. Antioxidant Activity and Constituents of Propolis Collected in Various Areas of China, Food Chemistry, 101 (2007),1383-1392.
  • 2. R., Aliyazıcioglu, H., Sahin, O., Erturk, E., Ulusoy, ve S., Kolayli, Properties of phenolic composition and biological activity of propolis from Turkey, International Journal of Food Properties, 16 (2013)., 277-287.
  • 3. F., Li, S., Awale, Y., Tezuka and S., Kadota, Cytotoxic Constituents From Brazilian Red Propolis and Their Structure–Activity Relationship, Bioorg., Med., Chem., 16 (2008), 5434–5440
  • 4. R.O., Silva, V.M., Andrade, E.S., Bulle Rego, G.A., Azevedo Doria, B.,Santos Lima, F.A., Silva, A.A.S., Araújo, Acute and sub-acute oral toxicity of Brazilian red propolis in rats. Journal of Ethnopharmacolgy, 170 (2015), 66-71.
  • 5. M.S. R., Neto, S.R., Tintino, A.R.P., da Silva, M.S., Costa, A.A., Boligon, E.F.F., Matias, V.Q., Balbino, R.A., Irwin Menezes and H.D.M. Coutinho, Seasonal variation of Brazilian red propolis: Antibacterial activity, synergistic effect and phytochemical screening. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 107 (2017), 572-580.
  • 6. Ö., Saral, Determination of Antioxidant Activities of the Chestnut and Flower Honeys Collected from Eastern Black Sea Region in Turkey. Journal of Apitherapy and Nature, 1 (2018), 28-32.
  • 7. E., Talla, A., Tamfu, P., Biyanzi, P., Sakava, F., Asobo, J., Mbafor, N. F., Tchuenguem and R., Ndjouenkeu,. Phytochemical Screening, Antioxidant Activity, Total Polyphenols and Flavonoids Content of Different Extracts of Propolis From Tekel (Ngaoundal, Adamawa Region, Cameroon), The Journal of Phytopharmacology, 3(2014), 5, 321-329.
  • 8. M., Popova, E., Giannopoulou, K., Skalicka-Wo´zniak, K., Graikou, J., Widelski, V., Bankova, H., Kalofonos, G., Sivolapenko, K., Gaweł- B˛eben, B., Antosiewicz, and I., Chinou, Characterization and Biological Evaluation of Propolis from Poland, Molecules, 22 (2017), 1159.
  • 9. X., Feás, L., Pacheco, A., Iglesias and L.M., Estevinho, Use of Propolis in the Sanitization of Lettuce,, Int. J. Mol. Sci.,15 (2014), 12243-12257.
  • 10. V. L. Singleton and J. A., Rossi Colorimetry of Total Phenolics with Phosphomolybdic–Phosphotungstic Acid Reagents, American Journal of Enology and Viticulture, 16 (1965), 144-158. 11. V. L., Singleton, R.Orthofer and R. M., Lamuela-Raventos, Analysis of Total Phenols and Other Oxidation Substrates and Antioxidants by Means of Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent, Methods in Enzymology, 299 (1999), 152-178.12. L. R., Fukumoto and G., Mazza, Assessing antioxidant and prooxidant activities of phenolic compounds, Journal Agriculture Food Chemistry, 48 (2000), 3597-3604. 13. B., Trusheva, M., Popova, E. B., Koendhori, I., Tsvetkova, C., Naydenski, and V., Bankova, Indonesian propolis: Chemical composition, biological activity and botanical origin, Natural Product Research, 25 (2011), 606–613. 14. J.S., Bonvehi, F.V., Coll, and R.E., Jorda, The Composition Active Components and Bacteriostatic Activity of Propolis in Dietetics, JAOCS, 71 (1994), 5, 18-25.
  • 15. M., Keskin and S., Kolaylı, Standardization of Propolis, is it Possible?, Uludağ Arıcılık Dergisi – Uludag Bee Journal, 18 (2) (2018): 101-110.16. V., Bankova, S., De Castro and M., Marcucci, Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin, Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 31 (1) (2000), 3-15.
  • 17. J. S. Bonvehi and A. L.. Gutierrez, Antioxidant Activity and Total Phenolics of Propolis from the Basque Country (Northeastern Spain), Am. Oil Chem. Soc., 88 (2011), 1387–1395.
  • 18. L.G., Dias, A.P., Pereira and L. M., Estevinho, Comparative Study of Different Portuguese Samples of Propolis: Pollinic, Sensorial, Physicochemical, Microbiological Characterization and Antibacterial Activity, Food and Chemical Toxicology, 50 (2012), 4246– 4253.
  • 19. R. G., Woisky, and A., Salatino,. Analysis of propolis: some parameters and procedures for chemical quality control, Journal of Apicultural Research, 37(2) (1998): 99-105.
  • 20. V., Bankova, A., Dyulgerov, S., Popov and N., Marekov, A GC/MS Study of the Propolis Phenolic Constituents, Z. Naturforsch, 42 (1987), 147–151.
  • 21. A.O., Sarıkaya, E., Ulusoy., N., Öztürk, M., Tunçel and S., Kolaylı, Antioxidant Activity And Phenolic Acidconstituents Of Chestnut (Castania Sativamill.) Honey And Propolis Journal of Food Biochemistry, 33 (2009) 470–481
  • 22. N., Duran, M., Muz and G., Culha, G., Duran and B., Ozer, GC-MS analysis and antileishmanial activities of two Turkish propolis types, Parasitol Res., 108 (2011):95–105
  • 23. M. Popova, S. Silici, O. Kaftanoglu and V. Bankova, Antibacterial activity of Turkish propolis and its qualitative and quantitative chemical composition, Phytomedicine, 12 (2005), 221–228.
  • 24. H., Katircioglu and N., Mercan, Antimicrobial activity and chemical compositions of Turkish propolis from different regions, African Journal of Biotechnology, 5 (11) (2006), 1151-1153
  • 25. S., Silici and S., Kutluca, Chemical composition and antibacterial activity of propoliscollected by three different races of honeybees in the same region, Journal of Ethnopharmacology, 99 (2005) 69–73.
  • 26. A., Uzel, K., Sorkun, O., Onçağ, D., Çoğulu, O, Gencay and B., Salih, Chemical compositions and antimicrobial activitiesof four different Anatolian propolis samples, Microbiological Research, 160(2005), 189—195.
  • 11. V. L., Singleton, R.Orthofer and R. M., Lamuela-Raventos, Analysis of Total Phenols and Other Oxidation Substrates and Antioxidants by Means of Folin-Ciocalteu Reagent, Methods in Enzymology, 299 (1999), 152-178.
  • 12. L. R., Fukumoto and G., Mazza, Assessing antioxidant and prooxidant activities of phenolic compounds, Journal Agriculture Food Chemistry, 48 (2000), 3597-3604.
  • 13. B., Trusheva, M., Popova, E. B., Koendhori, I., Tsvetkova, C., Naydenski, and V., Bankova, Indonesian propolis: Chemical composition, biological activity and botanical origin, Natural Product Research, 25 (2011), 606–613.
  • 14. J.S., Bonvehi, F.V., Coll, and R.E., Jorda, The Composition Active Components and Bacteriostatic Activity of Propolis in Dietetics, JAOCS, 71 (1994), 5, 18-25.
  • 16. V., Bankova, S., De Castro and M., Marcucci, Propolis: recent advances in chemistry and plant origin, Apidologie, Springer Verlag, 31 (1) (2000), 3-15.