DETERMINATION OF SHELF LIFE OF CHASTE TREE (Vitex agnus castus) HONEY AND PINE HONEY

Hayıt ve çam balları üç farklı üretici (doğal) ve üç farklı yerel marketten (ticari) satın alınmış ve balörnekleri 30 ay oda sıcaklığında depolanmıştır. Bal örneklerinin raf ömrü HMF miktarı ve diastaz aktiviteindeksleri üzerinden tahmin edilmiştir. HMF oluşumu ve diastaz deaktivasyonu sıfırıncı derecedenkinetik modele uyumlu bulunmuştur. En yüksek HMF oluşum hızı hayıt ballarında 2.674±0.013mg/kg/ay olarak hesaplanırken en düşük hız çam balında 0.435±0.037 mg/kg/ay olarak belirlenmiştir.Diastaz sayısı bakımından ise, en yüksek (0.613±0.000 DU/kg/ay) ve en düşük (0.318±0.002DU/kg/ay) deaktivasyon hızı doğal ve ticari hayıt ballarında belirlenmiştir. Balların 30 ay depolanmasısonunda HMF bakımından ticari hayıt balı hariç diğer tüm ballar daha uzun raf ömrüne sahip olmuştur.Bu sonuçlar ticari balların raf ömrünün botanik orjin, pH, elektriksel iletkenlik, sıcaklık ve depolamayabağlı olduğunu göstermektedir

HAYIT (Vitex agnus castus) VE ÇAM BALININ RAF ÖMRÜNÜN BELİRLENMESİ

Chaste tree and pine honeys were bought from three different producers (natural) and three local markets(commercial). The honey samples were stored for 30 months at room temperature. The shelf life of thesamples was estimated for indices of HMF and diastase activity. The values for HMF formation anddiastase deactivation fitted to a zero-order reaction. The highest rate of HMF formation was observedin the chaste tree honey as 2.674±0.013 mg/kg/month while the least value was observed in the pinehoney as 0.435±0.037 mg/kg/month. The maximum diastase deactivation was determined in the naturalchaste tree honey as 0.613±0.000 DU/kg/months and the minimum was 0.318±0.002 DU/kg/month forthe commercial chaste tree sample. In terms of HMF, all honeys except commercial chaste tree honey,have exhibited longer shelf life than 30 months of storage. The results showed that the shelf life of thecommercial honeys depend on the botanical origin, pH, electrical conductivity, temperature and storage

___

  • 1. Bogdanov S, Martin P. 2002. Honey Authenticity: a Review. MittGeb Lebensmunters Hyg, 93, 232-254. Address of access. http://www.umf.org.nz/ wp-content/uploads/2013/10/Bogdanov-and Martin_2002_Honey-authenticity-a-review.pdf
  • 2. Silici S. 2002. Chemical and polynological analysis of honey samples belenging to different regions of Turkey. The first German bee products and apitherapy congress, Passau, Germany, 23-24 March 2002, pp.61-61.
  • 3. Fallico B, Zappala M, Arena E, Verzea A. 2003. Effect of conditioning on HMF content in unifloral honeys. Food Chem, 85:305-313.
  • 4. Fallico B, Arena E, Zappala M. 2009. Prediction of honey shelf life. J Food Qual, 1-17. DOI: 10.1111/ j.1745-4557.2009.00253.x
  • 5. Cavia MM, Fernandez-Muinoa MA, GömezAlonso E, Montes-Perez MJ, Huidobro JF, Sanchoa MT. 2002. Evolution of fructose and glucose in honey over one year: influence of induced granulation. Food Chem, 78:157-161.
  • 6. Andrew BG, Bernard EC, Nicholas BS. 2004. Quality evaluation of honey harvested from selected areas in Tanzania with special emphasis on hydroxymethyl furfural (HMF) levels. Plant Foods Hum Nutr, 59:129-132.
  • 7. Belitz HD, Grosch W, Schieberle P. 2009. Food chemistry. 4th revised and extended edn. Berlin (DE): Springer.
  • 8. Khalil MI, Sulaiman SA, Gan SH. 2010. High 5-hydroxymethylfurfural concentrations are found in Malaysian honey samples stored for more than one year. Food Chem Toxicol, 48 (8-9):2388- 2392.
  • 9. Askar A. 1984. Flavour changes during production and storage of fruit juices. Fluessiges Obst, 51:564-569.
  • 10. Bath PK, Singh N. 1999. A comparison between Helianthus annuus & Eucalyptus lanceolatus honey. Food Chem, 67:389-397.
  • 11. Fallico B, Zappala M, Arena E, Verzera, A. 2004. Effects of heating process on chemical composition and HMF levels in Sicilian monofloral honeys. Food Chem, 85. 305-313.
  • 12. Anam OO, Dart RK. 1995. Influence of metal ions on hydroxymethylfurfural formation in honey. Anal Proc Incl Anal Commun, 32:515-517.
  • 13. Singh N, Bath PK. 1997. Quality evaluation of different types of Indian honey. Food Chem, 58, 129-133.
  • 14. Singh N, Bath PK. 1998. Relationship between heating and hydroxymethylfurfural formation in different honey types. J Food Sci Technol, 35, 154-156.
  • 15. Horn H, Hammes WP. 2002. The influence of temperature on honey quality parameters. Dtsch Lebensmitt Rundsch, 98, 366-372.
  • 16. Tosi E, Ciappini MRE, Lucero H. 2002. Honey thermal treatment effects on hydroxymethylfurfural content. Food Chem, 77: 71-74.
  • 17. Spano N, Casula L, Panzanelli A, Pilo MI, Piu PC, Scanu R, Tapparo A, Sanna G. 2006. An RP-HPLC determination of 5- hydroxymethylfurfural in honey: The case of strawberry tree honey, Talanta 68 (4, 15): 1390-1395.
  • 18. White JW. 1978. Honey. Adv Food Res, 24: 287-374.
  • 19. Lee HS, Nagy S. 1990. Relative reactivities of sugars in the formation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in sugar-catalyst model systems. J Food Process Preservation, 14 (3): 171-178.
  • 20. Gökmen V, fienyuva HZ. 2007. Effects of some cations on the formation of acrylamide and furfurals in glucose–asparagine model system. Eur Food Res Technol, 225 (5): 815-820.
  • 21. Kroh LW. 1994. Caramelisation in food and beverages. Food Chemistry, 51, 373-379.
  • 22. Gökmen V, Açar ÖC, Serpen A, Morales FJ. 2008. Effect of leavening agents and sugars on the formation of hydroxymethylfurfural in cookies during baking. Eur Food Res Technol, 226, 1031-1037.
  • 23. Fallico B, Arena E, Verzera A, Zappala M. 2006. The European Food Legislation and its impact on honey sector. Accredit Qual Assur, 11(1-2):49-54.
  • 24. Sancho MT, Muniategui S, Huidobro JF, Lozano JS. 1992. Aging of honey. J Agric Food Chem, 40, 134-138.
  • 25. Persano Oddo L, Pulcini P. 1999. A scientific note on the Phadebas method for honeys with low enzyme content, Apidologie, 30:347-348.
  • 26. Sanchez MD, Huidobro JF, Mato I, Muniategui S, Sancho MT. 2001. Correlation between proline content of honeys and botanical origin, Dtsch Lebensm Rundsch, 97, 171-175.
  • 27. Wang XH, Gheldof N, Engeseth NJ. 2004. Effect of processing and storage on antioxidant capacity of honey. J Food Sci, 69:96-101.
  • 28. Anonymous 2017. www.tuik.gov.tr/Prelstatistik Tablo.do?istab_id=691. Date of access: 11.07.2017.
  • 29. Kucuk M, Kolayli S, Karaoglu S, Ulusoy E, Baltaci C, Candan F. 2007. Biological activities and chemical composition of three honeys of different types from Anatolia. Food Chem, 100(2), 526-534.
  • 30. Silici S, Gokceoglu M. 2007. Pollen analysis of honeys from Mediterranean regions of Anatolia. Grana, 46, 57-64.
  • 31. Kayacier A, Karaman S. 2008. Rheological and some physicochemical characteristics of selected Turkish honeys. J Texture Stud, 39, 17-27.
  • 32. Senyuva HZ, Gilbert J, Silici S, Charlton A, Dal C, Gurel, N, et al. (2009). Profiling Turkish honeys to determine authenticity using physical and chemical characteristics. J Agric Food Chem, 57(9), 3911-3919.
  • 33. Tornuk F, Karaman, S , Ozturk I, Toker OS, Tastemur B, Sagdic O, Dogan M, Kayacier A. 2013. Quality characterization of artisanal and retail Turkish blossom honeys: Determination of physicochemical, microbiological, bioactive properties and aroma profile. Ind Crops Prod, 46: 124-131.
  • 34. Silici S, Karaman K, 2014. Chemometric approaches for the characterization of Turkish rhododendron and honeydew honeys depending on amino acid composition. J Liq Chromatogr Relat Technol, 37(6): 864-877.
  • 35. Can Z, Yildiz O, Sahin H, Turumtay EA, Silici S, Kolayli S, 2015. An investigation of Turkish honeys: Their physico-chemical properties, antioxidant capacities and phenolic profiles. Food Chem, 180: 133-141.
  • 36. K›l›c O, Kutlu MA, Ozdemir FA. 2016. Examination of the various chemical properties of the Hizan region (Bitlis-Turkey) honey types. Prog Nutr, 18(4):411-420.
  • 37. Kolayl› S, Can Z,Y›ld›z O, Sahin H, Karaoglu SA. 2016. A comparative study of the antihyaluronidase, antiurease, antioxidant, antimicrobial and physicochemical properties of different unifloral degrees of chestnut (Castanea sativa Mill.) honeys. J Enzyme Inhib Med Chem, 31: 96-104.
  • 38. K›vrak S, K›vrak I, Karababa E, 2017. Characterization of Turkish honeys regarding of physicochemical properties, and their adulteration analysis. Food Sci Technol, 37(1): 80-89.
  • 39. Karkacier M, Gurel F, Ozdemir F. 2000. Identification of different honeys using sugar composition determined by HPLC. G›da (Food), 25:69-73.
  • 40. Karkacier M, Gurel F, Efendi Y, Yayg›n E, Mutaf S. 1999. Effects of different storage conditions on the quality of flowers honey and honeydew. J Fac Agric, Akdeniz University, 8, 35-43.
  • 41. Anonymous 2008. Turkish Standards Institution TS 13365. Bal-Su muhtevas› tayini - Refraktometrik metot; Determination of water content of honeyRefractometric method
  • 42. Chen L, Huang H, Liu W, Peng N, Huang X. 2010. Kinetics of the 5-hydroxymethylfurfural formation reaction in Chinese rice wine. J Agric Food Chem, 58: 3507-3511.
  • 43. Y›lmaz H, Küfrevio¤lu ‹. 2001. Composition of Honeys Collected from Eastern and SouthEastern Anatolia and Effect of Storage on Hydroxymethylfurfural Content and Diastase Activity. Turk J Agric For, 25:347-349.
  • 44. Sanz ML, Polemis N, Morales,V. et al. 2005. In vitro investigation into the potential prebiotic activity of honey oligosaccharides. J Agric Food Chem, 53:2914-2921.
  • 45. Sahinler N, Gul A. 2005. Effect of heating and storage on honey hydroxy methylfurfural and diastase activity. J Food Technol, 3(2): 152-157.
  • 46. Zappala M, Fallico B, Arena E, Verzera A. 2005. Methods for the determination of HMF in honey: a comparison. Food Control, 16. 273-277.
  • 47. Ç›nar SB, Ekfli A. 2012. Türkiye’de üretilen çam bal›n›n kimyasal profili. GIDA, 37 (3): 149-156.
  • 48. Belitz HD, Grosch W, Schieberle P. 1992. Food chemistry. 4t h revised and extended edn. Berlin (DE): Springer.
  • 49. Fallico B, Arena E, Zappala M. 2008. Degradation of 5-hydroxymethylfurfural in honey. J Food Sci, 73: 625-631.
  • 50. Turhan I, Tetik N, Karhan M, Gürel F, Tavukçuo¤lu HR. 2008. Quality of honeys influenced by thermal treatment. Swiss Soc Food Sci Technol, LWT 41: 1396-1399.
  • 51. Souza RL, Yu H, Rataboul F, Essayem N. 2012. 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural (5-HMF) production from hexoses: limits of heterogeneous catalysis in hydrothermal conditions and potential of concentrated aqueous organic acids as reactive solvent system. Chall, 3: 212-232.
  • 52. O’Brien J. 1996. Stability of trehalose, sucrose and glucose to nonenzymatic browning in model systems. J Food Sci, 61: 679-682.
  • 53. Al-Diab D, Jarkas B. 2015. Effect of storage and thermal treatment on the quality of some local brands of honey from Latakia markets. J Entomol Zool Stud, 3: 328-334.
  • 54. Singhal RS. Kulkarni PR, Rege DV. 1997. Honey Qality Criteria in: Handbook of Indices of Food Quality and Authenticity, Woodhead Publishing Ltd, Cambridge, England.
  • 55. Bogdanov S, Ruoff K, Persano Oddo L. 2004. Physico-chemical methods for the characterisation of unifloral honeys: a review. Apidologie, 35: 4-17.
Gıda-Cover
  • ISSN: 1300-3070
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 6 Sayı
  • Başlangıç: 1976
  • Yayıncı: Prof. Dr. İbrahim ÇAKIR
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

ET VE ET ÜRÜNLERİNDE FOSFATLAR: İŞLEVLERİ VE İKAME OLANAKLARININ GÜNCEL ÇERÇEVEDE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Burcu ÖZTÜRK, Meltem SERDAROĞLU

KONVANSİYONEL EKSTRAKSİYONA ALTERNATİF: YEŞİL TEKNOLOJİLER

Naciye KUTLU, Gülen YEŞİLÖREN, Aslı İŞCİ, Özge ŞAKIYAN

EFFECT OF MEMBRANE DEGUMMING CONDITIONS ON PERMEATE FLUX AND PHOSPHOLIPIDS REJECTION

Fahri YEMİŞÇİOĞLU, Aytaç S GÜMÜŞKESEN, Pınar BOYNUEĞRİ

BEYAZ, YEŞİL VE SİYAH ÇAYLARIN (CAMELLIA SINENSIS) BAZI FİZİKSEL VE KİMYASAL ÖZELLİKLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Derya Atalay, Hande Selen Erge

PORTAKAL KABUĞUNDAN ELDE EDİLEN KRİTİK ALTI SU EKSTRAKTLARINDA ANTİOKSİDAN AKTİVİTE DEĞERLERİ ile FENOLİK BİLEŞİKLER ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ

Evrim ÖZKAYNAK KANMAZ, Özlem Saral

FERMENTE GIDALARDAN İZOLE EDİLEN LAKTİK ASİT BAKTERİLERİNİN ANTİFUNGAL AKTİVİTESİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Merih Kıvanç, Pınar Kovancı

MEMBRAN DEGUMMING KOŞULLARININ PERMEAT AKISI VE FOSFOLİPİDLERIN REDDEDİLMESİ ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Aytaç Gümüşkesen, Pınar Boynueğri, Fahri Yemişçioğlu

TANE NAR İLAVELİ LOKUM ÜRETİMİ VE VAKUM AMBALAJLAMANIN RAF ÖMRÜ ÜZERİNE ETKİSİ

Bülent BAŞYİĞİT, İbrahim HAYOĞLU, Aylin DİRİK

SALMONELLA, YOĞURT BAKTERİLERİNİN GELİŞİMİNİ ETKİLEYEBİLİR Mİ?

A. Kadir HALKMAN, Derya SAVRAN

TÜRKİYE'DEKİ KOYUN, DANA VE TAVUK KARACİĞER ÖRNEKLERİNDE CIVA, KURŞUN, KADMİYUM, BAKIR, DEMİR VE MANGAN TAYİNİ

Onur Yayayürük, Aslı Erdem Yayayürük