Ekonomik, Sosyal ve Politik Küreselleşmenin Ekonomik Büyüme Üzerindeki Etkisi: BRICS-T Ülkeleri İçin Bulgular

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, BRICS-T ülkelerinde ekonomik büyüme ile ekonomik, sosyal ve politik küreselleşmenin uzun dönemli ilişkisini 1990-2014 yıllarını kapsayan dönem için panel veri analizi yöntemlerini kullanarak analiz etmektir. Cobb-Douglas üretim fonksiyonuna dayalı olarak kurulan modelin ampirik sonuçlarına göre, sermaye birikiminin ve ekonomik, sosyal, politik küreselleşmenin ekonomik büyüme üzerinde pozitif etkili olduğu görülmektedir. Dumitrescu-Hurlin Panel Granger Nedensellik testi sonuçları ise sermaye birikimi ve politik küreselleşme ile ekonomik büyüme arasında çift yönlü nedensellik ilişkisi olduğunu göstermektedir. Ayrıca ekonomik ve sosyal küreselleşmeden ekonomik büyüme doğru tek yönlü nedensellik ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Bu doğrultuda BRICS-T ülkelerinin ekonomik, sosyal ve politik küreselleşme seviyelerini artırmaları ekonomik büyüme performansları üzerinde olumlu etki oluşturabileceği değerlendirilmektedir.

The Impact of Economic, Social And Political Globalization On Economic Growth: Evidence From BRICS-T Countries

The main purpose of this study is to analyze the long-term relationship between economic growth andeconomic, social and political globalization in BRICS-T countries by using panel data analysis methods forthe period covering the period 1990-2014. According to the empirical results of the model based on the CobbDouglas production function, it is seen that capital accumulation and economic, social and politicalglobalization have a positive effect on economic growth. Dumitrescu-Hurlin Panel Granger Causality testresults show that there is a bidirectional causality relationship between capital accumulation and politicalglobalization and economic growth. In addition, a one-way causality relationship from economic and socialglobalization to economic growth has been determined. Accordingly, it is considered that the BRICS-Tcountries' increasing their economic, social and political globalization levels may have a positive effect on theireconomic growth performances.

___

  • Afzal, M. (2007). The impact of globalization on economic growth of Pakistan. The Pakistan Development Review, 46 (4-2), 723-734.
  • Ali, A. & Imai, K. S. (2015). Crises, economic integration and growth collapses in African countries. Journal of African Economies, 24 (4), 471-501. doi.org/10.1093/jae/ejv010
  • Alvarado, R. Iñiguez, M., Ponce, P. (2017). Foreign direct investment and economic growth in Latin America. Economic Analysis and Policy, 56, 176-187. doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2017.09.006
  • Breitung, J. & Das, S. (2005). Panel unit root tests under cross sectional dependence. Statistica Neerlandica, 59 (4), 414-433. doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9574.2005.00299.x
  • Chang, C. P. & Lee, C. C. (2011). The effect of globalization and political party on economic growth: panel data analysis of former communist countries and European OECD members, Eastern European Economics, 49 (6), 5-26. https://doi.org/10.2753/EEE0012-8775490601
  • Chang, C. P., Berdiev, A. N., Lee, C. C. (2013). Energy exports, globalization and economic growth: the case of south caucasus. Economic Modelling, 33, 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2013.04.027
  • Chang, C.P. & Lee, C.C. (2010). Globalization and economic growth: a political economy analysis for OECD countries, Global Economic Review, 39 (2), 151.173. https://doi.org/10.1080/1226508X.2010.483835
  • Doğan, B. (2017). Relationship between economic globalization and growth: toda-yamamoto causality analysis in the case of Turkey. Journal of Finance-Political & Economic Comments, 54 (628), 19-27.
  • Doğan, B. & Can, M. (2016). The effect of globalization on growth: cointegration analysis for the sample of South Korea. Journal of The Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 6 (2), 197-220.
  • Dreher, A. (2006). “Does globalization affect growth? evidence from a new index of globalization”, Applied Economics, 38 (10), 1091-1110. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840500392078
  • Dumitrescu, E. I. & Hurlin C. (2012). Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels, Economic Modelling, 29 (4), 1450-1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
  • Eren, M. V. & Ergin, Ü. A. (2019). Analysis of the relationship between trade openness and economic growth: the case of Turkey Sosyoekonomi, 27 (39), 81-93. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2019.01.05
  • Gövdere, B. & Can, M. (2016). The effects of energy consumption, openness, financial development, capital formation and foreign trade on economic growth in Turkey: bounds testing approach, Niğde University Journal of The Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 9 (1), 209- 228.
  • Gözen, R. (2004). Post-international relations pluralism, globalization and september 11, 1st Edition, Alfa Publications, İstanbul. 71-72.
  • Gözgör, G. & Can, M. (2017). Causal linkages among the product diversification of exports, economic globalization and economic growth. Review of development economics, 21 (3), 888-908. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12301
  • Güney, T. (2017). The impact of economic freedom on economic growth in Turkey and BRICS countries, İnternational Revıew Of Economıcs and Management, 5 (2), 20-38. https://doi.org/10.18825/iremjournal.315949
  • Im, K. S., Lee, J., Tieslau, M. (2005). Panel LM unit‐root tests with level shifts. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67 (3), 393- 419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2005.00125.x
  • Im, K. S., Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y. (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115 (1), 53-74. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(03)00092-7
  • Kao, C. (1999). “Spurious regression and residual–based tests for cointegration in panel data”, Journal of Econometrics, 90 (1), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(98)00023-2
  • Kartal, Z. & Acaroğlu, H. (2017). Global economy and Turkey: The measurement of the globalization’s level, its property and its effects to the economic growth in the duration of integration to the global economy, 1961-2013. Pamukkale University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 26, 152-177.
  • Kılıç, C. (2015). Effects of globalization on economic growth: panel data analysis for developing countries. Petroleum-Gas University of Ploiesti Bulletin, Technical Series, 67 (1), 1-11.
  • Kıran, B. & Güriş, B. (2011). Business and financial growth impact openness in Turkey: a study on the 1992-2006 period, Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 11(2), 69-80.
  • Levin, A., C.F. Lin, C. Chu, (2002). Unit root test in panel data: asymptotic and finite sample properties, Journal of Econometrics 108, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-4076(01)00098-7
  • Manwa, F. & Wijeweera, A. (2016). Trade liberalization and economic growth link: the case of Southern African Custom Union countries. Economic Analysis and Policy, 51, 12-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2016.05.001
  • Midiyanti, R. & Yao, M. H. (2019). The dynamic relationship between globalization and economic growth: its implication on business policy. International Journal of Applied Business Research. 1 (2), 100-111. https://doi.org/10.35313/ijabr.v1i02.49
  • Mutascu, M. & Fleischer, A. M. (2011). Economic growth and globalization in Romania. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12 (10), 1691-1697.
  • Neto, D. G. & Veiga, F. J. (2013). Financial globalization, convergence and growth: the role of foreign direct investment. Journal of International Money and Finance, 37, 161-186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2013.04.005
  • Olimpia, N. & Stela, D. (2017). İmpact of globalization on economic growth in Romania: an empirical analysis of its economic, social and political dimensions. Studia Universitatis „Vasile Goldis” Arad–Economics Series, 27 (1), 29-40. https://doi.org/10.1515/sues-2017-0003
  • Örgün, B. O. & Pala, A. (2017). The relationship between energy consumption, trade openness and economic growth: panel granger causality analysis for EU-28 countries. Finance Political & Economic Commentary, 54 (623), 9-20.
  • Osterloh, S. (2012). Words speak louder than actions: the impact of politics on economic performance. Journal of Comparative Economics, 40 (3), 318-336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jce.2012.05.004
  • Özcan, C. C., Özmen, İ., Özcan, G. (2018). Causality relationship between trade openness and economic growth: emerging market economies. Selçuk University Journal of Social Sciences Institute, 40. 60-73.
  • Pedroni, P. (1999). “Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61(1), 653- 570. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653
  • Pedroni, P. (2001). "Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels", Baltagi, B.H., Fomby, T.B. and Carter Hill, R. (Ed.) Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration, and Dynamic Panels Advances in Econometrics, Vol. 15, 93-130: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0731-9053(00)15004-2
  • Pedroni, P. (2001). “Purchasing power parity tests in cointegrated panels”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 83, 727-931. https://doi.org/10.1162/003465301753237803
  • Pedroni, P. (2004). “Panel cointegration, asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the purchasing power parity hypothesis”, Econometric Theory, 20 (3), 597-625.
  • Rao, B. B. & Vadlamannati, K. C. (2011). Globalization and growth in the low income African countries with the extreme bounds analysis. Economic Modelling, 28 (3), 795-805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2010.10.009
  • Sakyi, D. (2011). Economic globalization, democracy and income in Sub-Saharan Africa: a panel cointegration analysis, Proceedings of the German Development Economics Conference, Berlin, 72, 1-34.
  • Swiss Economic Institute, KOF index https://kof.ethz.ch/en/forecasts-and-indicators/indicators/kofglobalisation-index.html (Erişim Tarihi: 11.05.2020)
  • Tekbaş, M. (2019). Investigation Of Globalization And Economic Growth Relations With Different Dimensions In BRICS-T Countries, PhD. Published Thesis, Gaziantep University Institute of Social Sciences, Gaziantep.
  • Topallı, N. (2016). Direct capital investment, the relationship between trade openness and economic growth: the example of Turkey and the BRICS countries. Dogus University Journal, 17 (1), 83- 95.
  • Türedi S. & Berber M. (2010). Financial development, trade relations between openness and economic growth: an analysis on Turkey, Erciyes University Journal of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 35, 301-316.
  • Ümit, A. Ö. (2016). Trade openness in Turkey, the relationship between financial openness and economic growth: the limit test approach. Journal of Ömer Halisdemir University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, 9 (1), 255-272.
  • Villaverde, J. and Maza, A. (2011). Globalization, growth and convergence. The World Economy, 34 (6), 952-971.
  • World Bank, (2019). https://data.worldbank.org/indicator (Erişim Tarihi: 11.05.2020).
  • Yapraklı, S. (2007). Openness with business and financial relationship between economic growth: an application Turkey. Istanbul University Faculty of Economics e-Journal of Econometrics and Statistics, 5, 67-89.
  • Zerrin, K. & Dumrul, Y. (2018). the impact of globalization on economic growth: empirical evidence from the Turkey. International Journal of Economics and Financial Issues, 8 (5), 115-123.