Onur YENİ

126

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA:BİR YAZIN TARAMASI1

Sürdürülebilirliğe ilişkin kaygılar, ekonomik kalkınma tartışmaları için yeni bir gündem oluşturmuş ve zaman içinde bu tartışmaların sürdürülebilir kalkınma eksenine oturmasına neden olmuştur. Ayrıca, sürdürülebilirlik tartışmaları, neoklasik iktisadın çevre ve doğal kaynaklara yönelik geleneksel bakış açısında bir kaymaya neden olmuş, yeni iktisadi akımların ortaya çıkmasına da zemin hazırlamıştır. Bu akımlar; neoklasik iktisadın bir alt kolu olarak değerlendirilen çevre ve doğal kaynaklar iktisadı ile bu akıma tepki olarak ortaya çıkan çevrebilimsel iktisat akımıdır. Bu çalışma, sürdürülebilirlik ve sürdürülebilir kalkınma kavramlarının tarihsel gelişim sürecini inceleyerek, bu kavramlar üzerindeki tartışmaları kuşaklararası eşitlik, kaynak dağılımında etkinlik, girdilerin ikame edilebilirliği gibi kavramlar üzerinden değerlendirmekte ve bu tartışmaların günümüzde geldiği noktayı ortaya koymaktadır. İktisadi akımların sürdürülebilirlik tartışmasındaki konumlanışları bu incelemenin sonunda açık biçimde ortaya çıkmaktadır. Burada yapılan inceleme, sürdürülebilirlik yazınında önümüzdeki dönemde değinilmesi gereken konulara ilişkin de bir görüntü sunmaktadır. Buna göre, sürdürülebilirlik ile teknolojik yenilikler arasındaki ilişkiyi ve girdiler arasındaki ikame edilebilirlik ilişkisini konu alan kuramsal ve görgül çalışmaların yanı sıra, zayıf ve güçlü sürdürülebilirlik ölçütlerine ilişkin görgül çalışmalar ve ülke örneklerine gereksinim bulunduğu belirlenmiştir.

SUSTAINABILITY AND SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT: A SURVEY OF THE LITERATURE

The concerns about sustainability set the new agenda for the debate on economic development and eventually induced the emergence of sustainable development as a focal point for these debates. Besides, debates on sustainability caused a shift in the conventional neoclassical perspective on the environment and natural resources and pave the way for the emergence of new economic schools such as environmental and natural resources economics and ecological economics which appeared in response to the former. Examining historical development process of sustainability and sustainable development concepts, this study reviews the debates on these concepts, in particular, focusing on intergenerational equity, efficiency in resource allocation and input substitutability, and reveals the current situation and positions held by economic schools of thought in these debates. Furthermore, this review presents a list of topics needed to be addressed in the future researches. In addition to theoretical and empirical studies investigating the relationship between sustainability and technological innovations, and substitutability relationship between inputs; the need for empirical research on weak and strong sustainability criteria and country studies are pinned down.
PDF

___

  • ADGER, W. N. (2000), "Social and ecological resilience: are they related?", Progress in Human Geography, 24(3), ss. 347-64, doi:10.1191/030913200701540465.
  • ADGER, W. N. (2006), "Ecological and social resilience", (Ed.) G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, & E. Neumayer, Handbook of Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, ss. 78- 90.
  • ALPAGUT, B. (1997), "Doğal Çevre ve İnsanın Evrimi", (Ed.) R. Keleş, İnsan, Çevre, Toplum (İkinci b.), İmge Yayınları, Ankara, ss. 113-19.
  • ARROW, K., BOLIN, B., COSTANZA, R., DASGUPTA, P., FOLKE, C., HOLLING, C. S., JANSSON, B. -O., LEVIN, S. MÄLER, K. -G., PERRINGS, C. & PIMENTEL, D. (1995), "Economic Growth, Carrying Capacity, and the Environment", Science, 268(5210), ss. 520-21, doi:10.1126/science.268.5210.520.
  • AYRES, R. U., VAN DEN BERGH, J., & GOWDY, J. M. (1998), "Viewpoint: Weak versus Strong Sustainability", Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers No. 98-103/3, Tinbergen Institute, Amsterdam/Rotterdam,http://www.tinbergen.nl/discussionpaper/?paper=1257 (20.08.2014).
  • BARBIER, E. B. (1999), "Endogenous Growth and Natural Resource Scarcity. Environmental and Resource Economics", 14(1), ss. 51-74, doi:10.1023/A:1008389422019.
  • BARBIER, E. B., BURGESS, J. C., & FOLKE, C. (1995), Paradise Lost? The Ecological Economics of Biodiversity, Earthscan, Londra.
  • BAUMOL, W. J. (1986), "On the Possibility of Continuing Expansion of Finite Resources", Kyklos, 39, ss. 167-79. BEDER, S. (1994), "Politics of Sustainable Development", http://www.uow.edu.au/~sharonb/esd/arena.html (15.08.2014).
  • BLEWITT, J. (2015), "Understanding sustainable development", Routledge, Abingdon.
  • BOVENBERG, A. L., & SMULDERS, S. (1995), "Environmental quality and pollution- augmenting technological change in a two-sector endogenous growth model", Journal of Public Economics, 57, ss. 369-91.
  • BRETSCHGER, L. (1998), "How to substitute in order to sustain: knowledge driven growth under environmental restrictions", Environment and Development Economics (4), ss. 425-42.
  • BRETSCHGER, L., & SMULDERS, S. (2012), "Sustainability and substitution of exhaustible natural resources: How structural change affects long-term R&D-investments", Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 36(4), ss. 536-49, doi:10.1016/j.jedc.2011.11.003.
  • CABEZA GUTÉS, M. (1996), "The concept of weak sustainability", Ecological Economics, 17(3), ss. 147-56, doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)80003-6.
  • CHICHILNISKY, G. (1996), "An axiomatic approach to sustainable development", Social Choice and Welfare, 13(2), ss. 231-57, doi:10.1007/BF00183353.
  • CHICHILNISKY, G. (1997), "What is sustainable development", Land Economics, 73(4), ss. 467- 91, doi:10.2307/3147240.
  • CHILDE, G. (1951/1983), "Man makes himself", NAL Penguin, New York. CLUB OF http://www.clubofrome.org/?p=375 (05.11.2014). "The story of the Club of Rome",
  • COLE, M. A. (2006), "Economic growth and the environment", (Ed.) G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, & E. Neumayer, Handbook of Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, ss. 240- 53.
  • COSTANZA, R., & DALY, H. E. (1992), "Natural Capital and Sustainable Development", Conservation Biology, 6(1), ss. 37-46, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x.
  • DALY, H. E. (1990), "Toward some operational principles of sustainable development", Ecological Economics, 2(1), ss. 1-6, doi:10.1016/0921-8009(90)90010-R.
  • DALY, H. E. (1991a), "Towards an Environmental Macroeconomics", Land Economics, 67(2), ss. 255-59, doi:10.2307/3146415.
  • DALY, H. E. (1991b), Steady State Economics, Second Ed. , Island Press, Washington, D. C..
  • DALY, H. E. (1991c), "Elements of environmental macroeconomics", (Ed.) R. Costanza,
  • Ecological Economics: The Science and Management of Sustainability, Columbia University
  • Press, New York, ss. 32-46
  • DALY, H. E. (1992), "Towards an Environmental Macroeconomics: Reply", Land Economics, 68(2), ss. 244-45, doi:10.2307/3146779.
  • DALY, H. E. (1995), "On Wilfred Beckerman's Critique of Sustainable Development", Environmental Values, 4(1), ss. 49-55.
  • DALY, H. E. (1996), Beyond Growth: The Economics of Sustainable Development, Beacon Press, Boston.
  • DASGUPTA, P., & HEAL, G. (1974), "The Optimal Depletion of Exhaustible Resources", Review of Economic Studies, 41, ss. 3-28.
  • DASGUPTA, P., & HEAL, G. (1979), Economic Theory and Exhaustible Resources, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  • DÜNYA BANKASI (1997), "Expanding the Measure of Wealth: Indicators of Environmentally Sustainable Development", The World Bank, Washington, D. C.
  • DÜNYA BANKASI (1999), "World Development Report 1999/2000: Entering the 21st Century", The World Bank, Washington, D. C.
  • EHRLICH, P. R., & EHRLICH, A. H. (1992), "The Value of Biodiversity", Ambio, 21(3), ss. 219- 26.
  • EKINS, P., SIMON, S., DEUTSCH, L., FOLKE, C., & DE GROOT, R. (2003), "A framework for the practical application of the concepts of critical natural capital and strong sustainability", Ecological Economics, 44(2-3), ss. 165-85, doi:10.1016/S0921- 8009(02)00272-0.
  • FARMAN, J. C., GARDINER, B. G., & SHANKLIN, J. D. (1985), "Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx/NOx interaction", Nature, 315, ss. 207-10, doi:10.1038/315207a0.
  • GOLLIER, C. (2002a), "Discounting an uncertain future", Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), ss. 149-66, doi:10.1016/S0047-2727(01)00079-2.
  • GOLLIER, C. (2002b), "Time horizon and the discount rate", Journal of Economic Theory, 107(2), ss. 463-73, doi:10.1006/jeth.2001.2952.
  • GOODLAND, R. (1995), "The Concept of Environmental Sustainability", Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 26, ss. 1-24, doi:10.1146/annurev.es.26.110195.000245.
  • GOULDER, L. H., & WILLIAMS, R. C. (2012), "The Choice Of Discount Rate For Climate Change Policy Evaluation", Climate Change Economics, 3(4), 1250024-1-18, doi:10.1142/S2010007812500248.
  • GOWDY, J. M., & MCDANIEL, C. N. (1995), "One world, one experiment: addressing the biodiversity--economics conflict", Ecological Economics, 15(3), ss. 181-92, doi:10.1016/0921-8009(95)00046-1.
  • GOWDY, J. M., & MCDANIEL, C. N. (1999), "The Physical Destruction of Nauru: An Example of Weak Sustainability", Land Economics, 75(2), ss. 333-38, doi:10.2307/3147015.
  • GOWDY, J., & O'HARA, S. (1997), "Weak sustainability and viable technologies", Ecological Economics, 22(3), ss. 239-47, doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(97)00093-1.
  • GRIMAUD, A., & ROUGÉ, L. (2003), "Polluting non-renewable resources, innovation and growth: welfare and environmental policy", Resource and Energy Economics, 27(2), ss. 109-29, doi:10.1016/j.reseneeco.2004.06.004.
  • GROTH, C., & SCHOU, P. (2002), "Can non-renewable resources alleviate the knife-edge character of endogenous growth?", Oxford Economic Papers, 54(3), ss. 386-411, doi:10.1093/oep/54.3.386.
  • GUNDERSON, L. H. (2000), "Ecological resilience: in theory and application", Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 31, ss. 425-39.
  • HAHNEL, R. (2014), Yeşil İktisat: Ekolojik Krize Karşı Koymak, (Çev.) N. Ersoy, P. Ertör, M. Gülboy, İ. Akgün, & A. K. Saysel, BGST Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • HAMILTON, C. (2006), "Measuring sustainable economic welfare", (Ed.) G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, & E. Neumayer, Handbook of Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, ss. 307-318.
  • HAMILTON, K. (1994), "Green adjustments to GDP", Resources Policy, 20(3), ss. 155-68. doi:10.1016/0301-4207(94)90048-5.
  • HAMILTON, K. (1995), "Sustainable Development, the Hartwick Rule and Optimal Growth", Environmental and Resource Economics, 5(4), ss. 393-411.
  • HARTWICK, J. M. (1977) "Intergenerational Equity and the Investing of Rents from Exhaustible Resources", American Economic Review, 67(5), ss. 972-74.
  • HARTWICK, J. M. (1978), "Substitution Among Exhaustible Resources and Intergenerational Equity", Review of Economic Studies, 45(2), ss. 347-54. doi:10.2307/2297349.
  • HEPBURN, C. (2006), "Valuing the far-off future: discounting and its alternatives", (Ed.) G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, & E. Neumayer, Handbook of Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, ss. 109-24.
  • HICKS, J. (1946), Value and Capital: An inquiry into some fundamental principles of economic theory, Second Ed., Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • HM TREASURY. (2013), The Green Book: Appraisal and Evaluation in Central Government, HM Treasury, Londra, https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-green-book- appraisal-and-evaluation-in-central-governent (12.09.2014).
  • HOLLING, C. S. (1973), "Resilience and Stability of Ecological Systems", Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4, ss. 1-23.
  • HOWARTH, R. B., & NORGAARD, R. B. (1992), "Environmental Valuation under Sustainable Development", American Economic Review, 82(2), ss. 473-77.
  • HUETING, R., & REIJNDERS, L. (1998), "Sustainability is an objective concept", Ecological Econonomics, 27(2), ss. 139-47, doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00033-0.
  • IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (1980), World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development, IUCN-UNEP-WWF.
  • JACOBS, M. (1995), "Sustainable Development, Capital Substitution and Economic Humility: A Response to Beckerman", Environmental Values, 4(1), ss. 57-68.
  • KELEŞ, R., HAMAMCI, C., & ÇOBAN, A. (2009), Çevre Politikası, Altıncı b., İmge Yayınları, Ankara.
  • KOOPMANS, T. C. (1963), "On the concept of optimal economic growth", Cowles Foundation Discussion http://cowles.econ.yale.edu/P/cd/d01b/d0163.pdf (10.10.2014). New Haven, Connecticut, ABD,
  • LI, C. Z., & LÖFGREN, K. -G. (2000), "Renewable resources and economic sustainability: a dynamic analysis with heterogeneous time preferences", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 40(3), ss. 236-50, doi:10.1006/jeem.1999.1121.
  • LÓPEZ, R. E., ANRÍQUEZ, G., & GULATI, S. (2007), "Structural change and sustainable development", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 57(3), ss. 307- 22, doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2006.10.003.
  • MÄLER, K. -G. (2000), "Development, ecological resources and their management: A study of complex dynamic systems", European Economic Review, 44(4-6), ss. 645-65, doi:10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00043-X.
  • MARKANDYA, A., HAROU, P., BELLÙ, L. G., & CISTULLI, V. (2002), Environmental Economics for Sustainable Growth: A Handbook for Practitioners, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham.
  • MARTÍNEZ-ALIER, J. (1995), "The environment as a luxury good or `too poor to be green´?" Ecological Economics, 13(1), ss. 1-10, doi:10.1016/0921-8009(94)00062-Z.
  • MEADOWS, D. H., MEADOWS, D. L., RANDERS, J., & BEHRENS III, W. W. (1972), The Limits to Growth: A Report for The Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind, Universe Books, New York.
  • MUNASINGHE, M. (1993), "Environmental Economics and Sustainable Development", The World Bank, Washington, D.C.
  • MUNASINGHE, M. (2001), "Sustainable development and climate change: applying the sustainomics transdisciplinary meta-framework", International Journal of Global Environmental Issues, 1(1), ss. 13-55, doi:10.1504/IJGENVI.2001.000970.
  • MUNASINGHE, M. (2009), Sustainable Development in Practice: Sustainomics Methodology and Applications, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • NEUMAYER, E. (1999) Weak Versus Strong Sustainability: Exploring the Limits of Two Opposing Paradigms, London School of Economics and Political Sciences Doktora Tezi. Londra.
  • NORDHAUS, W. D., & TOBIN, J. (1972) "Is Growth Obsolete?", (Ed.) W. D. Nordhaus, & J. Tobin, Economic Research: Retrospect and Prospect Vol. 5: Economic Growth, NBER, Cambridge, ss. 1-80.
  • OHRING, G., BOJKOV, R. D., BOLLE, H. -J., HUDSON, R. D., & VOLKERT, H. (2009), "Radiation and Ozone", Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 90(11), ss. 1669-81, doi:10.1175/2009BAMS2766.1.
  • OXERA (2002), "A Social Time Preference Rate for Use in Long-Term Discounting", ODPM, DfT ve DEFRA için hazırlanmış bir rapor, http://www.oxera.com/Latest- Thinking/Publications/Reports/2002/A-social-time-preference-for-use-in-long-term- disc.aspx (12.09.2014).
  • PEARCE, D. W., & ATKINSON, G. D. (1993), "Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development-an indicator of weak sustainability", Ecological Economics, 8(2), ss. 103-8, doi:10.1016/0921-8009(93)90039-9.
  • PEARCE, D. W., BARBIER, E. B., & MARKANDYA, A. (1990), Sustainable Development: Economics and Environment in the Third World. Edward Elgar, Aldershot.
  • PEARCE, D. W., MARKANDYA, A., & BARBIER, E. (1989), Blueprint for a Green Economy, Earthscan, Londra.
  • PIGOU, A. C. (1932), The Economics of Welfare, Macmillan & Co Ltd., Londra.
  • PONTING, C. (2008), Dünyanın Yeşil Tarihi: Çevre ve Büyük Uygarlıkların Çöküşü. (Çev.) A. Başçı, Sabancı Üniversitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • RAMSEY, F. P. (1928), "A mathematical theory of saving", Economic Journal, 38(152), ss. 543- 59.
  • RUTA, G., & HAMILTON, K. (2006), "The capital approach to sustainability", (Ed.) G. Atkinson, S. Dietz, & E. Neumayer, Handbook of Sustainable Development, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, ss. 45-62.
  • SCHOU, P. (2000), "Polluting Non-Renewable Resources and Growth", Environmental and Resource Economics, 16(2), ss, 211-27, doi:10.1023/A:1008359225189.
  • SOLOW, R. M. (1974a), "The Economics of Resources or the Resources of Economics", American Economic Review, 64(2), ss. 1-14.
  • SOLOW, R. M. (1974b), "Intergenerational Equity and Exhaustible Resources", Review of Economic Studies, 41, ss. 29-45.
  • SOLOW, R. M. (1986), "On the Intergenerational Allocation of Natural Resources", Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 88(1), ss. 141-49.
  • SOLOW, R. M. (1999), "Sustainability: An Economist's Perspective", (Ed.) R. N. Stavins, Economics of the Environment: Selected Readings, W. W. Norton & Co, New York, ss. 131-38.
  • SPASH, C. L. (1994), "Double CO2 and beyond: benefits, costs and compensation", Ecological Economics, 10(1), ss. 27-36, doi:10.1016/0921-8009(94)90034-5.
  • STERN, N. (2007), The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review, Cambridge University Press, New York.
  • STIGLITZ, J. (1974), "Growth with Exhaustible Natural Resources: Efficient and Optimal Growth Paths", Review of Economic Studies, 41, ss. 123-37.
  • TURNER, R. K., & PEARCE, D. W. (1992), "Sustainable Development: Ethics and Economics", CSERGE Working Paper PA 92-09, Centre for Social and Economic Research on the Global http://www.cserge.ac.uk/sites/default/files/pa_1992_09.pdf (08.08.2014). Norwich ve Londra,
  • WCED (World Commission on Environment and Development) (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • WEITZMAN, M. L. (1998), "Why the Far-Distant Future Should Be Discounted at Its Lowest Possible Rate?", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 36(3), ss. 201- 8, doi:10.1006/jeem.1998.1052.
  • WEITZMAN, M. L. (2001), "Gamma Discounting", American Economic Review, 91(1), ss. 260- 71.
  • WISE, T. A. (2001), "Economics of Sustainability: The Social Dimension-Overview Essay", (Ed.) J. M. Harris, T. A. Wise, K. P. Gallagher, & N. R. Goodwin, A Survey of Sustainable Development: Social and Economic Dimensions, Island Press, Washington, D. C., ss. 47-57.
Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 3 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Ankara Hacı Bayram Veli Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

UYGULAMALI SOSYAL BİLİM ARAŞTIRMALARINDA ÖLÇME, ÖLÇEKLER VE "LİKERT" ÖLÇEK KURMA TEKNİĞİ

Bülent BAYAT

RHETORIC AND PUBLIC DIPLOMACY: ANALYSIS OF A DOUBLE DIMENSIONAL LINK

Betül ÖZYILMAZ

ROBERT COX'UN "TEORİ DAİMA BAZILARI VE BAZI AMAÇLAR İÇİNDİR" ARGÜMANI ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME: ULUSLARARASI İLİŞKİLER

Buğra SARI

SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİRLİK VE SÜRDÜRÜLEBİLİR KALKINMA:BİR YAZIN TARAMASI1

Onur YENİ

İKTİSADİ VE TOPLUMSAL DÖNÜŞÜM VE YENİLİKÇİ GİRİŞİMCİ1

Derya AYDIN GÜLER, Seyfi KILIÇ