___

• Arıkan, S. ve Yıldırım, K. (2014, Haziran). Farklı yıllarda gerçekleştirilen PISA sınav sonuçları doğrultusunda Türk öğrencilerin matematik ve okuma başarı puanlarının yeterlilik düzeylerine göre karşılaştırmalı olarak incelenmesi. Bu bildiri 7. Uluslararası Türkçenin Eğitimi Öğretimi Kurultayında sunulmuştur.
• Avcı, S., Baysal, N., Gül, M. ve Yüksel, A. (2013). Okuma çember yönteminin okuduğunu anlama becerisine etkisi. Kuramsal Eğitim Bilim Dergisi, 6, 535-550.
• Avcı, S., Yüksel, A. ve Akıncı, T. (2010). Okuma alışkanlığı kazandırmada etkili bir yöntem: Okuma çemberi. M.Ü. Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 32, 5-24.
• Balantekin, M. ve Pilav, S. (2017). Okuma çemberi yönteminin okuduğunu anlama becerisine etkisi. Kırıkkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7, 149-170.
• Beach. R. (1993). Reader-response theories. Urbana. IL: National Council of Teachers of English.
• Becker, R. R. (1999). Reader response: Students develop text understanding. Reading Horizons, 40, 103-126.
• Brown, K. (1995). Going with the flow: Getting back on course when literature circles flounder. In B. C. Hill, N. J. Johnson, & K. L. S. Noe (Eds.), Literature circles and response (pp. 1-12). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods. University Press: Oxford.
• Cook, T. D., Campbell, D. T. ve Shadish, W. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
• Cox. C. ve Boyd-Batstone. P. (1997). Crossroads: Literature and language in culturally and linguistically diverse classrooms. Columbus, OH: Merrill Publishing.
• Creswell, J. W. ve Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Daniels, H. (2002). Literature circles: Voice and choice in book clubs and reading groups. Portland, ME: Stenhouse.
• Day, D.L. (2002). “A taste of teaching”: Preservice teachers and children engage in literature circles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Arizona, USA.
• Doğan, B. ve Çermik, H. (2016). Kitap okumaya yönelik tutum ölçeği: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Education Sciences, 11(4), 168-183.
• Doğan, B., Ateş, S., Çermik, H. ve Yıldırım, K. (2018). Okuma göstergeleri zayıf! İyileştirmek için bir adım atalım. Türk Akademik Yayınlar Dergisi, 2, 46-62.
• Doğan, B., Yıldırım, K., Çermik, H. ve Ateş, S. (2018). Okuma Çemberleri: Niçin ve nasıl? Örnek bir uygulama. Ana Dili Eğitimi Dergisi, 6(3), 747-765.
• Eeds, M. ve Peterson, R. (1991). Teacher as curator: Learning to talk about literature. The Reading Teacher. 45(2), 118-126.
• Evans, K. (1996). A closer look at literature discussion groups: The influence of gender on student response and discourse. The New Advocate, 9, 183-196.
• Evans, K. S. (1993). Just when you thought it was complicated enough: Literature discussions meet critical theory (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The University of Arizona, USA.
• Evans, K. S. (2001). Literature discussion groups in the intermediate grades: Dilemmas and possibilities. Newark, OE: International Reading Association.
• Fowler, L. A. (1996). A qualitative investigation of fifth graders’ talk in book clubs of varying ability configurations (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The University of Texas at Austin, USA.
• Goodman, Y. M. (1988). Exploring the power of written language through literature for children and adolescents. The New Advocate, 1, 254-265.
• Huck, C. S. (1990). The power of children’s literature in the classroom. In K. G. Short, & K. M. Pierce, (Eds.), Talking about books: Creating literate communities (pp. 3-15). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Kaya, D. (2018). Okuma çemberlerinin okuduğunu anlama, akıcı okuma, okuma motivasyonu ve sosyal beceriler üzerindeki etkisi ve okur tepkilerinin belirlenmesi (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi). Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Denizli.
• Kaysi, F., Acar, F. ve Altun, S. (Mayıs, 2016). Anlamaya dayalı tasarımla üniversite öğrencilerinin yabancı dilde okuma deneyimlerinin değerlendirilmesi. Bu araştırma International Conference on Quality in Higher Education, Sakarya’da sunulmuştur.
• Kennedy, G. (2010). The effects of skill-focused minilessons on students’ independent use of reading skills during literature circles (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Florida Atlantic University, USA.
• Lane, H. B., Hudson, R. F., Leite, W. L., Kosanovich, M. L., Strout, M. T., Fenty, N. S. ve Wright, T. L. (2008). Teacher knowledge about reading fluency and indicators of students' fluency growth in reading first schools. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 25(1), 57-86.
• Lee, Y-C. (2002). A case study of an experienced elementary teacher implementation of literature circles within her literacy program (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Northern Colorado, USA.
• Lehman, B. A. ve Scharer, P. L. (1996). Reading alone, talking together: The role of discussion in developing literary awareness. The Reading Teacher, 50(1), 26-35.
• Maloch, A. E. (2000). Scaffolding student talk: the teacher’s role in literature discussion groups in third-grade classroom (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Vanderbilt University, USA.
• Mccormack, R. L. (1995). Learning to talk about books: Second graders participation in peer-led literature discussion groups (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), Boston University, USA.
• McCutchen, D., Abbott, R.D., Green, L.B., Beretvas, N., Cox, S., Potter, N.S., Quiroga, T. ve Gray, L. (2002). Beginning literacy: links among teacher knowledge, teacher practice, and student learning. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 35, 69-86.
• Özbay, M. ve Kaldırım, A. (2015). Okuma çemberi tekniğinin öğretmen adaylarının eleştirel okuma öz yeterlilik alglarına etkisi. International Journal of Languages’ Education and Teaching, 3, 222-234.
• Peterson. R. ve Eeds, M. (1990). Grand conversations: Literature groups in action. New York: Scholastic.
• Podhajski, B., Mather, N., Nathan, J. ve Sammons, J. (2009). Professional development in scientifically based reading instruction: Teacher knowledge and reading outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 403-417.
• Reeder, G. M. (1991). Effects of booktalks on adolescent reading attitudes (Unpublished doctoral dissertation), The University of Nebraska, USA.
• Reid Lyon, G. ve Weiser, B. (2009). Teacher knowledge, instructional expertise, and the development of reading proficiency. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(5), 475-480.
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
• Rosenblatt. L. (1938). Literature as exploration. New York: Modem Language Association.
• Sarı, T., Kurtuluş, E. ve Yücel-Toy, B. (2017). Okuma çemberi yönteminin ortaokul 7. Sınıf öğrencilerinin okuma-anlama becerilerine etkisinin incelenmesi. Yıldız Journal of Educational Research, 2, 1-14.
• Schoonmaker, R.G. (2014). A blended learning approach to reading circles for English language learners. Second Language Studies, 33(1),1-22
• Seidman, I. E. (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research: A guide for researchers in education and the social sciences. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Short, K. G. (1997). Literature as a way of knowing. York, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.
• Short, K. G. (1999). The search for “balance” in a literature-rich curriculum. Theory into Practice, 38(3), 130-137.
• Short, K. G. (Ed.) (1995). Research and professional resources in children’s literature: Piecing a patchwork guilt. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
• Short. K. G. (1993). Making connections across literature and life. In K. E. Holland, S. B. Ernst. ve R. A. Hungerford. (Ed.), Journeying: Children responding to literature. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
• Stronge, J. H. (2002). Qualities of effective teachers. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, Virginia USA.
• Thomas, D. (2013). The effects of literature circles on the reading achievement of college reading students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle Tennessee State University, USA.
• Villaume, S.K., ve Hopkins, L. (1995). A transactional and sociocultural view of response in a fourth-grade literature discussion group. Reading Research and Instruction, 34, 190-203.
• Yıldırım, K. ve Arıkan, S. (2014, Haziran). 2012 PISA sınav sonuçlarına göre Türkiye’deki bölgelere ilişkin öğrencilerin matematik ve okuma başarı düzeyleri. Bu bildiri 7. Uluslararası Türkçenin Eğitimi Öğretimi Kurultayında sunulmuştur.