The significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in patients with resected non-small cell lung carcinoma

Amaç: Nöroendokrin diferansiyasyon (NED) en sık adenokarsinomlar(AD’ler) ve büyük hücreli karsinomlar (BHK’ler) olmak üzere küçükhücreli dısı akciğer karsinomlarının (KHDAK’lerin) %10-30’unda im- münhistokimyasal veya elektron mikroskopik yöntemler ile saptanabilir.Bu tümörler kollektif olarak “nöroendokrin diferansiyasyon gösterenküçük hücreli dısı akciğer karsinomları (KHDAK-NED)” olarak isim- lendirilirler. Ancak bu özelliğin klinik olarak önemi KHDAK-NED’de tamolarak aydınlatılamamıstır. Bu çalısmada evre I-IV KHDAK’li hastalardanöroendokrin belirleyiciler için immünhistokimyasal yöntem kullanılarakNED’nin sıklığı ve klinik öneminin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıstır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Cerrahi olarak rezeke edilmis evre I-IV KHDAK’li71 hastada immünhistokimyasal olarak nöron spesifk enolaz (NSE), kro- mogranin A (Kr A) ve nöroflament (NF) kullanılmasıyla NED ve prog- noz arasındaki iliski arastırılmıstır. Nöroendokrin belirleyicilerin immün- boyanma sonuçları sağkalım verileri ile karsılastırılmıstır. Bulgular: NSE ekspresyonu en sık BHK’lerde (%66.7) saptanırken, Kr Aekspresyonu ise en sık AD’lerde (%25.8) gözlenmistir ancak NF ile hiç- bir KHDAK olgusunda immünreaktiviteye rastlanmamıstır. Multivary- ans analiz KHDAK olgularında; lobektomiye karsılık pnömomektomiuygulanmasının olumsuz, NSE ekspresyonunun ise olumlu prognostikfaktör olduğunu ortaya koymustur. Sonuç: Rezeke KHDAK hastalarında NED’nin prognostik bir önemiolabilir ancak daha genis olgu serileri üzerinde spesifk antikorlarlaçalısılarak, bu hasta popülasyonunda NED klinik açıdan daha ayrıntılıarastırılmayı gerektirmektedir.

Rezeke küçük hücreli dısı akciğer karsinomlu hastalarda nöroendokrin diferansiyasyonun önemi

Purpose: Neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) can be detected in 10- 30% of non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs), with the highest fre- quency in adenocarcinomas (ACs) and large cell carcinomas (LCCs), byimmunohistochemical or electron microscopic techniques. These tumorsare collectively referred to as non-small cell lung carcinomas with neu- roendocrine differentiation (NSCLC-NED). However, the clinical signif- cance of this feature is not fully elucidated in NSCLC-NED. The purposeof this study was to evaluate the prevalence and the clinical signifcance ofNED in patients with stage I-IV NSCLC by using immunohistochemistryfor neuroendocrine markers. Materials and Methods: The relationship between NED and prognosiswas investigated by immunohistochemistry using neuron specifc enolase(NSE), chromogranin A (Chr A), and neuroflament (NF) in 71 patientswith surgically resected stage I-IV NSCLC. The immunostaining resultsof NE markers were compared with survival data. Results: While NSE expression was detected most often in LCCs (66.7%),that of Chr A was seen mostly in ACs (25.8%) but none of the NSCLCcases showed immunoreactivity with NF. Multivariate analysis showedthat pneumonectomy versus lobectomy carried a poorer prognosis whileNSE expression predicted a better prognosis in NSCLC cases. Conclusion: NED may be of prognostic signifcance in patients with re- sected NSCLC but the clinical signifcance of NED in this subpopulationneeds further analysis with specifc antibodies in larger series.

___

  • 1. Travis WD, Brambilla E, Müller-Hermelink HK, Harris CC, eds. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the lung, pleura, thymus and heart. Lyon: International Agency for Research on Cancer Press; 2004.
  • 2. Brambilla E, Lantuejoul S, Sturm N. Divergent differentiation in neuroendocrine lung tumors. Semin Diagn Pathol 2000; 17: 138-148.
  • 3. Naruke T, Tsuchiya R, Kondo H, et al. Implications of staging in lung cancer. Chest 1997; 112: 242S-248S.
  • 4. Mountain CF. Revisions in the international system for staging lung cancer. Chest 1997; 111: 1710-1717.
  • 5. Kardaun OJWF. Kidney-survival analysis of IgA nephropathy patients: A case study. In: Rao CR, Chakraborty R, eds. Handbook of statistics 8. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers BV.; 1991. p. 407-459.
  • 6. Gazdar AF. Advances in the biology of lung cancer. Clinical signifcance of neuroendocrine differentiation. Chest 1989; 96: 39S-41S.
  • 7. Gazdar AF. Advances in the biology of non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 1986; 89: 277-283.
  • 8. Graziano SL, Mazid R, Newman N, et al. The use of neuroendocrine immunoperoxidase markers to predict chemotherapy in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1398-1406.
  • 9. Linnoila RI, Jensen S, Steinberg S, et al. Neuroendocrine differentiation in non-small lung cancer correlates with favorable response to chemotherapy. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol 1989; 8: 248.
  • 10. Berendsen HH, Leij L, Poppema S, et al. Clinical characterization of non-small cell lung cancer tumors showing neuroendocrine differentiation features. J Clin Oncol 1989; 7: 1614-1620.
  • 11. Gazdar AF, Kadoyama C, Venzon D, et al. Association between histological type and neuroendocrine differentiation on drug sensitivity of lung cancer cell lines. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1992; 13: 191-196.
  • 12. Carles J, Rosell R, Ariza A, et al. Neuroendocrine differentiation as a prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 1993; 10: 209-219.
  • 13. Shaw GL, Gazdar AF, Phelps R, et al. Correlation of in vitro drugsensitivity testing results with response to chemotherapy and survival: comparison of non-small cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. J Cell Biochem Suppl 1996; 24: 173-185.
  • 14. Schleusener JT, Tazelaar HD, Jung S, et al. Neuroendocrine differentiation is an independent prognostic factor in chemotherapy-treated nonsmall cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 1996; 77: 1284-1291.
  • 15. Linnoila RI, Mulshine JL, Steinberg SM, et al. Neuroendocrine differentiation in endocrine and nonendocrine lung carcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol 1988; 90: 641-652.
  • 16. Gazdar AF, Helman LJ, Israel MA, et al. Expression of neuroendocrine cell markers L-dopa decarboxylase, chromogranin A, and dense core granules in human tumors of endocrine and nonendocrine origin. Cancer Res 1988; 48: 4078-4082.
  • 17. Kayser K, Schmid W, Ebert W, et al. Expression of neuroendocrine markers (neuronspecifc enolase, synaptophysin and bombesin) in carcinoma of the lung. Path Res Pract 1988; 183: 412-417.
  • 18. Graziano SL, Tatum AH, Newman NB, et al. The prognostic signifcance of neuroendocrine markers and carcinoembryonic antigen in patients with resected stage I and II non-small cell lung cancer. Cancer Res 1994; 54: 2908-2913.
  • 19. Said JW, Vimadalal S, Nash G, et al. Immunoreactive neuron-specifc enolase, bombesin, and chromogranin as markers for neuroendocrine lung tumors. Hum Pathol 1985; 16: 236-240.
  • 20. Loy TS, Darkow GVD, Quesenberry JT. Immunostaining in the diagnosis of pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas. An immunohistochemical study with ultrastructural correlations. Am J Surg Pathol 1995; 19: 173-182.
  • 21. Sundaresan V, Reeve JG, Stenning S, et al. Neuroendocrine differentiation and clinical behaviour in non-small cell lung tumours. Br J Cancer 1991; 64: 333-338.
  • 22. Brambilla E, Veale D, Moro D, et al. Neuroendocrine phenotype in lung cancers. Comparison of immunohistochemistry with biochemical determination of enolase isoenzymes. Am J Clin Pathol 1992; 98: 88-97.
  • 23. Carnaghi C, Rimassa L, Garassino I, et al. Clinical signifcance of neuroendocrine phenotype in non-small cell lung cancer. Ann Oncol 2001; 12: S119-S123.
  • 24. Pujol JL, Boher JM, Grenier J, et al. Cyfra 21-1, neuron specifc enolase and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer: prospective study in 621 patients. Lung Cancer 2001; 31: 221-231. 25. Hiroshima K, Iyoda A, Shibuya K, et al. Prognostic signifcance of neuroendocrine differentiation in adenocarcinoma of the lung. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1732-1735.
  • 26. Iyoda A, Hiroshima K, Baba M, et al. Pulmonary large cell carcinomas with neuroendocrine features are high-grade neuroendocrine tumors. Ann Thorac Surg 2002; 73: 1049-1054.
  • 27. Pujol JL, Simony J, Demoly P, et al. Neural cell adhesion molecule and prognosis of surgically resected lung cancer. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993; 148: 1071-1075.
  • 28. Skov BG, Sorensen JB, Hirsch FR, et al. Prognostic impact of his- tologic demonstration of chromogranin A and neuron specifc enolase in pul- monary adenocarcinoma. Ann Oncol 1991; 2: 355-360. Perçinel et al
  • 29. Kibbelaar RE, Moolenaar KEC, Michalides RJAM, et al. Neural cell adhesion molecule expression, neuroendocrine differentiation and prognosis in lung carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 1991; 27: 431-435.
  • 30. Pelosi G, Pasini F, Sonzogni A, et al. Prognostic implications of neuroendocrine differentiation and hormone production in patients with Stage I non-small cell lung carcinoma. Cancer 2003; 97: 2487-2497.
  • 31. Gajra A, Tatum AH, Newman N, et al. The predictive value of neuroendocrine markers and p53 for response to chemotherapy and survival in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Lung Cancer 2002; 36: 159-165.
  • 32. Graziano SL, Tatum A, Herndon JE II, et al. Use of neuroendocrine markers, p53, and HER2 to predict response to chemotherapy in patients with Stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. Lung Cancer 2001; 33: 115-123.
  • 33. Graziano SL, Kern JA, Herndon JE, et al. Analysis of neuroendocrine markers, HER2 and CEA before and after chemotherapy in patients with Stage IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: a Cancer and Leukemia Group B study. Lung Cancer 1998; 21: 203-211.
  • 34. Abbona G, Papotti M, Viberti L, et al. Chromogranin A gene expression in non-small cell lung carcinomas. J Pathol 1998; 186: 151-156.
  • 35. Hage R, Elbers HR, Brutel de la Riviere A, et al. Neural cell adhe- sion molecule expression: prognosis in 889 patients with resected non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 1998; 114: 1316-1320.
  • 36. Wertzel H, Grahmann PR, Bansbach S, et al. Results after surgery in undifferentiated large cell carcinoma of the lung: the role of neuroendocrine expression. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 1997; 12: 698-702.
  • 37. Linnoila RI, Piantadosi S, Ruckdeschel JC. Impact of neuroendocrine differentiation in non-small cell lung cancer. Chest 1994; 106: 367S-371S.
  • 38. Harada M, Yokose T, Yoshida J, et al. Immunohistochemical neuroendocrine differentiation is an independent prognostic factor in surgically
  • resected large cell carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer 2002; 38: 177-184. 39. Addis BJ. Neuroendocrine differentiation in lung carcinoma. Thorax 1995; 50: 113-115.
  • 40. Kiriakogiani-Psaropoulou P, Malamou-Mitsi V, Martinopoulou U, et al. The value of neuroendocrine markers in non-small cell lung cancer: a comparative immunohistopathologic study. Lung Cancer 1994; 11: 353-364.
  • 41. Capella C, Heitz PU, Hofer H, et al. Revised classifcation of neu- roendocrine tumours of the lung, pancreas and gut. Virchows Arch 1995; 425: 547-560.
  • 42. O’Connor DT, Frigon RP. Chromogranin A, the major catecholamine storage vesicle soluble protein: multiple size forms, subcellular storage, and regional distribution in chromaffn and nervous tissue elucidated by radioimmunoassay. J Biol Chem 1984; 259: 3237-3247.
  • 43. Varndell IM, Llyod RV, Wilson BS, et al. Ultrastructural localiza- tion of chromogranin: a potential marker for the electron microscopical recognition of endocrine cell secretory granules. Histochem J 1985; 17: 981-992.
  • 44. Wiedenmann B, Huttner WB. Synaptophysin and chromogranins/ secretogranins-widespread constituents of distinct types of neuroendocrine vesicles and new tools in tumor diagnosis. Virchows Archiv B Cell Pathol 1989; 58: 95-121.
Gazi Medical Journal-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yılda 4 Sayı
  • Yayıncı: Gazi Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

The significance of neuroendocrine differentiation in patients with resected non-small cell lung carcinoma

Ayten Cangır KAYI, Sema BİRCAN, Ayşe SERTÇELİK, Sibel PERÇİNEL

İnsan multiple myeloma hücre dizisi ARH77’de vinkristinin survivin gen ifadesi üzerine etkisi

Fatma Belgin ATAÇ, Erkan YURTÇU, Feride İffet ŞAHİN

Transient erythroblastopenia and parvovirus B19 infection in a healthy newborn

Yıldız ATALAY, Canan TÜRKYILMAZ, Deniz ASLAN, Özden TURAN

İnfektif endokardit saptanan çocuklarda klinik, laboratuvar ve ekokardiyografik parametrelerin retrospektif değerlendirilmesi

Berna Şaylan ÇEVİK, Türkay SARITAŞ, Timur MEŞE, Vedide TAVLI

Comparison of in vitro activity of cefditoren with other oral antibiotics against nosocomial urinary escherichia coli strains

Murat DİZBAY, Dilek ARMAN, Arzu ALTUNÇEKİÇ, Özcan Derya KANAT, Özgür GÜNAL

Hipopituitarizm’li bir olguda koroner arter baypas cerrahisi: Vaka sunumu

Selim İSBİR, Sinan ARS, Koray AK, Ahmet GÜLER

Eroziv gastritlerde CA 19-9, CEA ve CA 72-4 düzeyleri

Süleyman BÜYÜKBERBER, Banu ÖZTÜRK, Mehmet CİNDORUK, Emel YAMAN, Ali Osman KAYA, Uğur COŞKUN, Mustafa BENEKLİ, Ramazan YILDIZ

Percutaneous drainage of spontaneous retroperitoneal urinoma: A case report

Murat ZOR, Önder A. ORS, Tayfun EYİLEN, Murat YENİCESU, Şeref BASAL, Murat KOCAOĞLU

Gastroskopi öncesi açlık süresinin gastrik rezidü ve ph üzerine etkisi

Mustafa SARIOĞLU, Yunus ÜNAL, Tülay KORKMAZ

Pulmoner arteriyel hipertansiyon hastalarının tedavisinde vazoaktif ajanların etkinliği

Bülent BOYACI, Gülten TAÇOY, Kaan OKTAY