NEOLİBERALİZMİN POLİTİK TAHAYYÜLÜ: SERBEST PİYASANIN “BÜYÜSÜ”

Neoliberal tahayyül nedir ve onu oluşturan temel özellikler nelerdir? Neoliberal tahayyül alternatif gelecek tasarımlarının önünü nasıl kapatır? Bu makale, neoliberalizmin politik tahayyülünü kavramsallaştırmayı amaçlamaktadır. Neoliberalizmin politik tahayyülü, kendimizi ve içinde yaşadığımız toplumsal gerçekliği şekillendiren, yapılandıran, fakat aynı zamanda da sınırlayan bir politik tahayyüldür. Bu anlamda, neoliberalizm sadece ekonomik bir rasyonelliğe indirgenemez; aynı zamanda imgeler, ön varsayımlar ve kültürel aygıtlardan da oluşan bir tahayyüle sahiptir. Neoliberalizmin politik tahayyülü, kimin kamusal tartışmalara müdahale edeceğini, kimin bilgisinin otorite olarak kabul edileceğini, hangi tür argümanların onaylanacağını ve dolayısıyla kimin bakış açısının siyasete dahil edilip dışlanacağını belirler. Yazının temel iddiası şudur: neoliberalizmin politik bir tahayyülü vardır ve bu tahayyül, bireyin ve nüfusların verili düzen lehine davranması için, özellikle serbest piyasa tarafından belirlenen bir tahayyüldür. Neoliberalizm, yaşamı esasen serbest piyasa üzerinden algılar.

Anahtar Kelimeler:

neoliberalizm, politik tahayyül, serbest piyasa, biyopolitika

THE POLITICAL IMAGINARY OF NEOLIBERALISM: “MAGIC” OF FREE MARKET

What is a neoliberal imaginary and how is it constituted? How does it foreclose alternative future imaginaries? This article explores a better conceptualisation of what I call ‘the political imaginary of neoliberalism’, that is the images, presuppositions, cultural apparatuses, and other modes of control and representation through which neoliberalism has established and maintains a hegemonic position. It seeks to demonstrate that neoliberalism should not be understood only as an economic doctrine but as a comprehensive framework, a truly political imaginary, that shapes, structures but also restrains how we see and understand ourselves, the social reality we live in and what we imagine as possible. The political imaginary of neoliberalism delineates who can credibly intervene in public debates, whose knowledge is accepted as authoritative, what type of arguments are accepted, and hence, whose perspectives are included and excluded in politics. The main contention of the article is that neoliberalism has a political imaginary, which is specifically shaped by free market policies. This is a process in which politics operates according to a single economic logic, a violent process in which free market appeared to become an unquestionable, naturalised background.

Keywords:

neoliberalism, political imaginary free-market, security, biopolitics, techno-optimism,

PDF

___

Brown, W., In the Ruins of Neoliberalism: The Rise of Antidemocratic Politics in the West, New York: Columbia University Press, 2019.
Brown, W., Undoing the Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution, Zone Books, New York, 2015.
Bruff, I., “The Rise of Authoritarian Neoliberalism, Rethinking Marxism 26, 2014, 113-129.
Burns, J., Goddess of the Market: Ayn Rand and the American Right, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.
Davies, W., “Neoliberalism: A Bibliographic Review”, Theory, Culture & Society 31, 2014, 309-317.
Davies, W., The Limits of Neoliberalism: Authority, Sovereignty and the Logic of Competition, Sage, Londra, 2014.
Dillon M. ve Reid, J., The Liberal Way of War: Killing to Make Life Live, Routledge, Londra, 2009.
Eagleton, T., Culture and the Death of God, New Haven, CT, Yale University Press, 2014.
Fisher, M., Capitalist Realism, London: Zero Books, 2009.
Foucault, M., The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France 1978–1979, Palgrave Macmillan, New York, 2008.
Fraser, N., Scales of Justice: Reimagining Political Space in a Globalizing World, Columbia University, New York, 2009.
Giroux, H., “The Terror of Neoliberalism: Rethinking the Significance of Cultural Politics”, College Literature 32, 2005, 1-19.
Harvey, D., A Brief History of Neoliberalism, Oxford University, Oxford, 2005.
Hayek, F., “Freedom, Reason, and Tradition”, Ethics 68, 1958, 229-45.
Hayek, F., “Kinds of Rationalism”, Studies in Philosophy, Politics and Economics içinde, London: Routledge, 1964.
Hayek, F., “The Principles of a Liberal Social Order”, Il Politico 31, 1966, 601-18.
Hayek, F., Law, Legislation, and Liberty, London, Routledge, 1982.
Hayek, F., The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, Chicago: University Of Chicago Press, 1991.
Hayek, F., The Road to Serfdom, London: Routledge, 2008.
Mirowski, P., Never Let a Serious Crisis Go to Waste: How Neoliberalism Survived the Financial Meltdown, Verso, London, 2014.
Mirowski, P., Science-Mart, Harvard University Press Cambridge, Massachusetts, and London, 2011.
Mises, L. v., Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth, Auburn, Alabama, The Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1990.
Mises, L. v., Human Action, Auburn, Alabama, The Ludwig von Mises Institute, 1998.
Mises, L. v., Socialism: An Economic and Sociological Analysis, New Haven, Yale University Press, 1951.
Mises, L. v., The Anti-Capitalist Mentality, Auburn, Alabama, The Ludwig von Mises Institute, 2008.
Moyn, S., “Imaginary Intellectual History”, Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History içinde, Eds Darrin M ve Samuel M., New York: OUP, 2014, 112-130.
Rand, A., Atlas Shrugged, Signet, Penguin, 1999.
Rand, A., The Virtue of Selfishness, Signet, Penguin, 1964.
Robin, C., The reactionary mind: conservatism from Edmund Burke to Donald Trump, New York: Oxford University Press, 2018.
Simental, M. G., “The Gospel According to Ayn Rand: Anthem as an Atheistic Theodicy”, The Journal of Ayn Rand Studies 13, 2013, 96-106.
Slobodian, Q., Globalists: The End of Empire and the Birth of Neoliberalism, Cambridge, MA: HUP, 2018.
Springer, S., “The Violence of Neoliberalism”, The Handbook of Neoliberalism içinde, Eds S. Springer, K. Birch ve J MacLeavy, London, Routledge, 2016, 153–63.
Taşkale, A. R., Post-Politics in Context, London, Routledge, 2016.
Taylor, C., Modern Social Imaginaries, Durham, NC ve London, DUP. Walker, J., The Ayn Rand cult, Chicago: Open Court, 1999.