Comparison of healing effects of propolis to silver sulfadiazine on full thickness skin wounds in rabbits

Propolis ve silver sulfadiazine'in yara iyileşmesi üzerine etkileri kalitatif ve kantitatif parametreler ile histopatolojik bulgular değerlendirilerek saptandı. On tavşanın sırt bölgesinde üçer tam kalınlıklı toplam 30 tane yara oluşturuldu. Yaraların 10 tanesi propolis, 10 tanesi silver sulfadiazine ve 10 tanesi kontrol olarak gruplandırıldı. Yaralara her gün propolis %50 kremi, SS ve bepanthane kremi (kontrol) uygulandı. Postoperatif dönemde yara genişlemesi, kontraksiyonu ve epitelizasyon kantitatif olarak analiz edildi. Sonuç olarak propolisin diğer gruplara göre daha iyi bir yara iyileşmesi sağladığı saptandı.

Tavşanlarda tam kalınlıkta deri yaralarında propolis ve silver sulfadiazine'in yara iyileşmesi üzerine etkilerinin karşılaştırılması

The effects of propolis and silver sulfadiazine (SS) on the wound healing were determined using qualitative and quantitative parameters and histopathological findings. A total of 30 full thickness skin wounds, 3 from each of 10 rabbits, were created on their dorsal aspects. Of these wounds, 10 were allocated to group 1 (propolis), other 10 group 2 (SS) and other 10 control. The skin wound in the 1, 2 and 3 groups were covered daily with 50% propolis cream, SS skin cream and bepanthane cream (control), respectively. Postoperatively the wound surfaces were macroscopically examined and the healing process and the rates of wound expansion, contraction and epithelialization processes were quantitatively analyzed. As a result, propolis was found in general to have a better wound healing feature than others

___

  • 1) Castaldo S, Capasso F. Propolis, an old remedy used in modern medicine. Fitoterapia 2002; 73: 1-6.
  • 2) Kartal M, Yıldız S, Kaya S. ve ark. Antimicrobial activity of propolis samples from two different regions of Anatolia. J. Ethnopharmacol 2003; 86: 69-73.
  • 3) Kooa H, Gomesa BP, Rosalen PL et al. In vitro antimicrobial activity of propolis and Arnica montana against oral pathogens. Arch Oral Biol 2000; 45: 141-148.
  • 4) Borrelli F, Maffia P, Pinto L, et al. Phytochemical compounds involved in the antiinflammatory effect of propolis extract. Fitoterapia 2002; 73: 53-63.
  • 5) Khayyal MT, El-Ghazaly MA, El-Khatib AS Mechanism involved in the antiinflammatory effect of propolis extract. Drug Exp Clin Res 1993; 19: 197-203.
  • 6) Grunberger D, Ganarjee R, Eisinger K et al. Preferential cytoxicity on tumor cells by caffeic acid phenethyl ester isolated from Propolis. Experientia 1980; 44: 230–232.
  • 7) Park YK, Koo MH, Abreu JA et al. Antimicrobial activity of Propolis on oral microorganisms. Curr Microbiol 1998; 36: 24–28.
  • 8) Kılıç, S, Timurkaan, N, Unsaldı, S ve ark. Comparison of Effects of Some Wound Healing Materials on Full Thickness Skin Wounds in Rabbits. Turkish Journal of Veterinary and Animal Sciences 2002; 26: 263-272.
  • 9) Luna LG: Manuel of Histologic Staining Methods of Armed Forces Institute of Pathology. McGraw-Hill Book Company, New-york, 222, 226, 1968.
  • 10) Subrahmanyam M A prospective randomised clinical and histological study of superficial burn wound healing with honey and silver sulfadiazine. Burns 1998; 24: 157-161.
  • 11) Nagaia T, Sakai M, Inoue R et al. Antioxidative activities of some commercially honeys, royal jelly, and propolis. Food Chem 2001; 75: 237-240.
  • 12) Gracia CG An open study comparing topical silver sulfadiazine and topical silver sulfadiazine–cerium nitrate in the treatment of moderate and severe burns. Burns 2001; 27: 67-74.
  • 13) Gregory RS, Piccolo N, Piccolo MT et al. Comparison of Propolis Skin Cream to Silver Sulfadiazine: A Naturopathic Alternative to Antibiotics in Treatment of Minor Burns. J Altern Complem Med 2002; 8: 77-83.