Para Politikasının Etkilerinde Sektörel Asimetriler: Türkiye İçin VAR Analizi
Literatürde para politikasının makro değişkenler üzerine etkisini vektör otoregresif modelleri ile inceleyen çok sayıda çalışma yer almaktadır. Ancak, son zamanlardaki bazı çalışmalar para politikasının sektörel etkileri üzerinde durmaya başlamıştır. Parasal aktarım mekanizmasının anlaşılmasında sektörel analiz, makro değişkenlerle yapılan analizden daha yararlıdır, çünkü bu yöntem sayesinde para politikasının sektörel etkileri daha kolay anlaşılmaktadır. Diğer bir ifadeyle bu analiz para politikasının sektörler üzerine asimetrik etkisinin olup olmadığını ortaya koyabilmektedir. Bu yüzden, bu tür analizler parasal aktarım mekanizması hakkında daha fazla bilgi sağlamaktadırlar. Bu çalışmada, Türkiye’de çeşitli sektörlerin para politikasına tepkileri analiz edilmiştir. Tahmin sonuçlarına göre, Türkiye’de çeşitli sektörler para politikasındaki değişikliklere çok farklı tepkiler vermiştir. Bu asimetri sektörel yapılardaki veya endüstrilerin karakteristik özelliklerindeki farklılıklardan kaynaklanan faiz oranına karşı farklı duyarlılıklar ile açıklanabilir.
Sectoral Asymmetries in the Effects of Monetary Policy: VAR Analysis for Turkey
There are a lot of papers investigating the effect of monetary policy on aggregate variables within the vector autoregressive framework. Recently, some of these studies have focused on sectoral effects of monetary policy. Sectoral analysis is more helpful than aggregate analysis in the understanding of the monetary transmission mechanism because it is easy to understand sectoral effects of monetary policy. In other words, it can be revealed whether or not there is any asymmetric effect of monetary policy. So, it provides advantageous information about monetary transmission mechanism. In this study, we have investigated the response of various industrial sectors to monetary policy in Turkey. According to the estimation results, there are significant differences between industries in response to monetary policy in Turkey. This asymmetry is explained by different sensitivity to interest rate originated from different sectoral structure or characteristics of these industries.
___
- ARNOLD, Ivo J.M.; (2001), “The Regional Effects of Monetary
Policy in Europe”, Journal of Economic Integration, 16(3), pp.
399-420.
- ARNOLD, Ivo J.M. and Evert B. Vrught; (2002), “Regional Effects
of Monetary Policy in the Netherlands”, International Journal
of Business and Economics, 1(2), pp. 123-134.
- BERNANKE, Ben S. ve Alan S. BLINDER; (1992), “The Federal
Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Policy”, American
Economic Review, 82 (4), ss. 901-921.
- CARLINO, Gerald and Robert DEFINA; (1998), “The Differential
Regional Effects of Monetary Policy”, The Review of Economics
and Statistics, 80(4), pp. 572- 587.
- CENGİZ, Vedat ve Mehmet DUMAN; (2008), “Türkiye’de Banka
Kredi Kanalının Önemi Üzerine Etki Tepki Fonksiyonlarına
Dayalı Bir Değerlendirme(1990-2006)”, H.Ü. İktisadi ve İdari
Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 26 (2), ss. 81-104.
- DALE, Spencer and Andrew G. HALDANE; (1995), “Interest
Rates ant the Channels of Monetary Transmission: Some Sectoral
Estimates”, European Economic Review, 39(9), pp.1611-
1626.
- DEDOLA, Luca and Francesco LIPPI; (2005), “The Monetary
Transmission Mechanism: Evidence from the Industries of five
OECD Countries”, European Economic Review, 49(6), 2005,
pp. 1543-1569.
- DICKEY, David. A., and, Wayne A. FULLER; (1979), Distribution
of the Estimators for Autoregressive Time Series with
a Unit Root, Journal of The American Statistical Association,
74(366a), 427-431.
- ENDERS, Walter; (2004), Applied Econometric Time Series,
3rd Edition, John Wiley & Sons.
- GANLEY, Joe and Chris SALMON; (1997), “The Industrial Impact
of Monetary Policy Shocks: Some Stylised Facts”, Bank of
England Working Paper, Paper No: 68, pp. 26-28, http://www.
bankofengland.co.uk/archive/Documents/historicpubs/workingpapers/1997/wp68.pdf,
24.04.2016
- GERTLER, Mark and Simon GILCHRIST; (1994), “Monetary
Policy Business Cycles and the Behavior of Small Manufacturing
Firms”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(2), pp. 309-
340.
- GRANGER, C. William and Paul NEWBOLD; (1974), “Spurious
Regressions in Econometrics”, Journal of Econometrics, 2(2),
111-120.
- GÜLOĞLU, Bülent ve Orhan SEVİNÇ; (2008), “Türkiye’de
Parasal Aktarım Mekanizmalarının Makroekonomik Etkileri”,
İktisat İşletme ve Finans, 23(268), ss. 94-118.
- GÜNDÜZ, Lokman (2001). “Türkiye’de Parasal Aktarım
Mekanizması ve Banka Kredi Kanalı”, İMKB Dergisi, 5(18),
ss.13-30
- HAMILTON, James D.; (1994), Time Series Analysis, Princeton
University Press.
- HAYO, Bernd and Birgit UHLENBROCK; (1999), “Industry
Effects of Monetary Policy in Germany”, ZEI Working
Paper B 14, pp.1-31, https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/
10419/39583/1/303028025.pdf, 24.04.2016
- IACOVİELLO, Matteo; (2008), “Vector Autoregressions”, Unpublished
Lecture Notes, https:// www2 .bc.edu /~iacoviel/
teach /0809/EC751_files/var.pdf, 25.04.2016
- IBRAHIM, Mansor H.; (2005), “Sectoral Effects of Monetary
Policy: Evidence from Malaysia”, Asian Economic Journal,
19(1), pp. 83-102.
- JAMIL, Muhammad and Muhammad IRFAN, “Monetary Policy
Business Cycles and Sectoral Response in Pakistan”, Economica,
12 (4), pp.171-190.
- KASHYAP, Anıl K. and Jeremy C. STEİN; (2000), “What Do A
Million Observations on Banks Say About the Transmission of
Monetary Policy?, American Economic Review, 90(3), 407-28.
- KISHAN, Ruby P. and Tımothy P. OPİELA; (2000), “Bank Size
Bank Capital and the Bank Lending Channel”, Journal of Money
Credit and Banking, 32(1), 121-41.
- KWIATKOWSKI, D., PHILLIPS, P. C. B., SCHMIDT, P., and
Y, SHIN; (1992), “Testing the Null Hypothesis of Stationarity
Against the Alternative of a Unit Root”, Journal of Econometrics,
54(1–3): 159–178.
- NIELSEN, Bent ; (2001), “Order Determination in General
Vector Autoregressions”, Working Paper, Department of Economics,
University of Oxford and Nuffield College. http://ideas.
repec.org /p/nuf/ econwp/0110.html, 12.06.2016
- NIELSEN, Heino Bohn; (2005), “Non-Stationary Time Series
and Unit Root Tests”, Unpublished Lecture Notes for Econometrics
2, http://www.econ.ku.dk/metrics/Econometrics2_05
_II/Slides/ 08_unitroottests_2pp .pdf, 12.06.2016
- PAULSEN, Jostein; (1984), “Order Determination of Multivariate
Autoregressive Time Series with Unit Roots”, Journal of
Time Series Analysis, 5(2), 115–127.
- PEERSMAN, Gert and Frank SMETS; (2005), “The Industry
Effects of Monetary Policy in the Euro Area”, Economic Journal,
115(503), pp. 319-342.
- RAMEY, Valerie A.; (1993), “How Important Is The Credit Channel
in the Transmission of Monetary Policy?”, NBER Working
Paper, Paper No: 4285, ss. 1-42, http://www.nber.org/ papers/
w4285, 24.04.2016
- RODRIGUEZ, Fuentes, C. J. and David Padron- MARRERO;
(2008), “Industry Effects of Monetary Policy in Spain”, Regional
Studies, 42(3), pp. 375- 384.
- ROMER, Christina D. ve David H. ROMER; (1990), “New
Evidence on the Monetary Transmission Mechanism” Brooking
Papers on Economic Activity, 1, ss. 149-213, https://www.
brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/1990/01/1990a_bpea_
romer_romer_goldfeld_ friedman.pdf, 22.04.2016
- SIMS, Christopher A; (1980), “Macroeconomics and Reality”,
Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 48(1),
pp: 1-48.
- ŞENGÖNÜL, Ahmet and Willem THORBECKE; (2005), “The
effect of Monetary Policy on Bank Lending in Turkey”, Applied
Financial Economics,15(3), pp 931-934.
- TSAY, Ruy S; (1984), “Order Selection in Nonstationary Autoregressive
Models”, Annals of Statistics 12(4), pp:1425–1433.
- ZİVOT, Eric ve Jiahui WANG; (2007) Modeling financial time
series with S-Plus® (Vol. 191). Springer Science & Business
Media.
- ZİVOT, Eric ve Donald W. K. ANDREWS; (1992), Further Evidence
on the Great Crash, the OilPrice Shock, and the UnitRoot
Hypothesis. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics
10(3):251-270.