INCOME-HEALTH NEXUS: PANEL COINTEGRATION AND CAUSALITY EVIDENCE

This study examines the relationship between the GDP per capita and infant mortality rate in 13 CEE countries over the period from 1995 to 2017 by means of panel cointegration and causality methods. We find that there is a cointegration when the infant mortality rate as dependent and GDP per capita as independent variable. Our estimates indicate that a 1 percent increase in GDP per capita leads to 0.19 percent reduction in infant mortality rates in the long run. However, we don’t find any evidence for a cointegrating relationship when the GDP per capita is the dependent and infant mortality rate is the independent variable. Finally, there is a unidirectional causality running from GDP per capita to infant mortality rate. Therefore, this study highlights the importance of income to reduce the infant mortality rate and present evidence for the argument that wealthier is healthier in a sense.

___

  • ACEMOGLU, Daron and Jorn-Steffen PISCHKE; (1999), “The structure of wages and investment in general training”, Journal of Political Economy, 107 (3), pp. 539–572.
  • BALDWIN, Robert E; (1995), The Effects of Trade and Foreign Direct Investment on Employment and Relative Wages. NBER Working Paper 5037.
  • BELDERBOS, Rene; Vincent VAN ROY and Florence DUVIVIER; (2013), “International and domestic technology transfers and productivity growth: firm level evidence” Industrial and Corporate Change, 22 (1), pp.1–32.
  • BELL, Martin and Anabel MARIN; (2004), “Where do foreign direct investment-related technology spillovers come from in emerging economies? An exploration in Argentina in the 1990s”, The European Journal of Development Research, 16(3), pp. 653–686.
  • BELLAK, Christian; (2004), “How domestic and foreign firms differ and why does it matter?”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 18 (4), pp.483–514.
  • BEN-SALHA, Ousama; (2013), “Does Economic Globalization Affect the Level and Volatility of Labor Demand by Skill? New Insights from the Tunisian Manufacturing Industries”, Economic Systems,37 (4), pp. 572–597.
  • BRANNLUND, Runar; Jonas NORDSTROM and Jesper STAGE; (2016), “Foreign Ownership and Its Effects on Employment and Wages: The Case of Sweden”, IZA Journal of European Labor Studies, 5 (8), pp. 1-17.
  • CONIGLIO, Nicola D.; Francesco PROTA and Adnan SERIC; (2015), “Foreign Direct Investment, Employment and Wages in Sub-Saharan Africa”, Journal of International Development, 27 (7), pp. 1243–1266.
  • DALGIÇ, Başak and Fazlıoğlu, Burcu; (2015), “Foreign affiliated firms and employment: Evidence from Turkey”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 13 (2), pp. 365- 374.
  • FOSTER-MCGREGOR, Neil; Anders ISAKSSON and Florian KAULICH; (2015), “Foreign Ownership and Labour in Sub-Saharan African Firms”, African Development Review, 27 (2), pp. 130–144.
  • GALLIE, Emilie-Pauline and Diego LEGROS; (2012), “Firms’ human capital, R&D and innovation: a study on French firms”, Empirical Economics 43, pp.581–596.
  • GURBUZ, Ali Osman and Asli Aybars; (2010), “The impact of foreign ownership on firm performance, evidence from an emerging market: Turkey”, American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 2 (4), pp. 350-359.
  • HUTTUNEN, Kristiiana; (2007), “The Effect of Foreign Acquisition on Employment and Wages: Evidence from Finnish Establishments”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 89 (3), pp. 497–509.
  • KALAYCI, Elif; (2013), “Foreign ownership, R&D and knowledge spillovers in developing countries: Evidence from Turkey”, The International Journal of Sciences, 8 (1), pp. 29-44.
  • KRAMMER, Sollins M.S.; (2010), “International R&D spillovers in emerging markets: the impact of trade and foreign direct investment”, Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 19 (4), pp.591–623.
  • LAURSEN, Kent and Ammon SALTER; (2004), “Searching high and low, what types of firms use universities as a source of innovation?”, Research Policy 33(8), pp.1201– 1215.
  • LEE, Eddy and Marco VIVARELLI; (2006), “The Social Impact of Globalization in the Developing Countries”, International Labour Review, 145 (3), pp. 167–184.
  • LIU, Wen-Hsien; Pan-Long TSAI and Ching-Lung TSAY; (2015), “Domestic Impacts of Outward FDI in Taiwan: Evidence from Panel Data of Manufacturing Firms?”, International Review of Economics and Finance, 39,pp. 469–484.
  • NARULA, Rajneesh and Anabel MARIN; (2003), FDI spillovers, absorptive capacities, and human capital development: evidence from Argentina. MERIT-Infonomics Research Memorandum Series, 2003-016.
  • PAPKE, Leslie E. and Jeffrey M. WOOLDRIDGE; (1996), “Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates”, Journal of Applied Econometrics 11 (6), pp. 619-632.
  • SLAUGTHER, Matthew, J.; (2002), Skill upgrading in developing countries: has inward foreign direct investment played a role? CEPA Working Paper 2002-08.
  • SÖNMEZ, Alper; (2016), “Determinants of human capital intensity : An empirical analysis on automotive suppliers in Turkey”, Gaziantep University Journal of Social Sciences, 15 (2), 327-345.
  • TEIXERIA, Aurora A.C. and Ana Teresa TAVARES-LEHMANN; (2014), “Human capital intensity in technology-based firms located in Portugal: Does foreign ownership matter?”, Research Policy, 43, pp. 737-748.
  • WOOD, Adrian and Cristobal RIDAO-CANO; (1999), “Skill, trade and international inequality”, Oxford Economic Papers, 51, pp.89–119.