Coase Teoremine Alternatif Bakış

Bu makalenin ana hedefi Coase teoremini almaşık yaklaşımlara odaklanarak incelemektir. Yazında teoremin yerleşik versiyonu sıklıkla irdelenmesine rağmen alternatif yorumlar yeterince dikkate alınmamaktadır. Oysaki, Coase teoreminin ayrımlı şekilde değerlendirilmesi "Hukuk ve Ekonomi" disiplininde daha sistematik ve kapsamlı araştırmaların yapılmasını mümkün kılacaktır. Bu amaçla çalışmada öncelikle teoremin yerleşik versiyonu işlem maliyetleri ve mülkiyet hakları çerçevesinde irdelenmiş; daha sonra teoremin geçerliliğini sorgulamak amacıyla standart aktarıma yöneltilen eleştiriler taranmıştır. Gözlemlenen alternatif yaklaşımlar tartışılarak makale sonlandırılmıştır

An Alternative View of the Coase Theorem

The primary goal of this article is to examine the Coase theorem by focusing on the alternative approaches. Although the mainstream version of the theorem has been studied frequently in the literature, the alternative views have been rarely discussed. However, illustrating the theorem in different ways can lead to a more systematic and thorough examination in the discipline of "Law and Economics". To accomplish this goal, the study starts with an investigation of the mainstream version of the theorem in the context of transaction costs and property rights; and followed by a review of the criticisms that have been directed against the standard demonstration in order to address the validity of the theorem. The paper is concluded with a discussion of the alternative approaches

___

  • AIVAZIAN, V. A. and J. L. CALLEN; (1981), "The Coase Theo- rem And The Empty Core", Journal of Law and Economics, (1), pp. 175-181.
  • ALLEN, D. W.; (2000), "Transaction Costs", B. BOUCKAERT and G. DE GEEST (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 893-926.
  • BECKER, G. S.; (1968), "Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach", Journal of Political Economy 76(2), pp. 169-217.
  • BENTHAM, J.; (1789), "An Introduction To The Principles Of Morals And Legislation", (The Utilitarians, 1973 edition), An- chor Books, Garden City, New York, pp. 5-398.
  • BUCHANAN, J.; (1973), "The Coase Theorem And The Theory Of The State", Natural Resources Journal, 13, pp. 579-594.
  • CALABRESI, G.; (1968), "Transaction Costs, Resource Alloca- tion And Liability Rules-A Comment", Journal of Law and Eco- nomics, 11(1), pp. 67-73.
  • CHEUNG, S. N. S.; (1998), "The Transaction Costs Paradigm", Economic Inquiry, 36(4), pp. 514-521.
  • COASE, R. H.; (1937), "The Nature Of The Firm", Economica, (16), pp. 386-405.
  • COASE, R. H.; (1960), "The Problem Of Social Cost", Journal of Law and Economics 3, pp. 1-44.
  • COASE, R. H.; (1981), "The Coase Theorem And The Empty Core: A Comment", Journal of Law and Economics, 24(1), pp. 187.
  • COASE, R. H.; (1988), The Firm, The Market, And The Law, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
  • COLEMAN, J., (1980), "Efficiency, Exchange, And Auction: Philosophic Aspects Of The Economic Approach To Law", Cali- fornia Law Review, 6(2), pp. 221-249.
  • COLEMAN, J.; (1982), "The Normative Basis Of Economic Analysis: A Critical Review Of Richard Posner's -The Econom- ics Of Justice-", Stanford Law Review, 34(5), pp. 1105-1131.
  • COOTER, R.; (1982), "The Cost Of Coase", The Journal of Le- gal Studies, 11(1), pp. 1-33.
  • COOTER, R. and T. ULEN; (2004), Law and Economics, Third edition, Pearson/Addison Wesley, US.
  • ÇETİN, T.; (2012), "İktisat, Kurumsal İktisat Ve İktisat Sosyolo- jisi", Sosyoloji Konferansları, 45 (1), ss. 43-73.
  • DAHLMAN, C. J.; (1979), "The Problem Of Externality", Journal Of Law And Economics, 22(1), pp. 141-162.
  • DONOHUE; J. J. III; (1989), "Diverting The Coasean River: In- centive Schemes To Reduce Unemployment Spells", The Yale Law Journal, 99(3), pp. 549-609.
  • DEMSETZ, H.; (1972), "When Does The Rule Of Liability Mat- ter?", Journal of Legal Studies, 1(1), pp. 13-28.
  • DEMSETZ, H.; (2011), "The Problem Of Social Cost: What Problem? A Critique Of The Reasoning Of A. C. Pigou And R. H. Coase", Review of Law and Economics, 7, pp. 1-13.
  • ELLICKSON, R. C.; (1986), "Of Coase And Cattle: Dispute Resolution Among Neighbors In Shasta County", Stanford Law Review, 38(3), pp. 623-687.
  • ELLICKSON, R. C.; (1991), Order Without law: How Neigh- bours Settle Disputes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  • FARBER, D. A.; (1997), "Parody Lost/Pragmatism Regained: The Ironic History Of The Coase Theorem", Virginia Law Re- view, 83(2), pp. 397-428.
  • FRECH, H. E. III; (1979), "The Extended Coase Theorem And Long Run Equilibrium: The Non-Equivalence Of Liability Rules And Property Rights", Economic Inquiry, 17(2), pp. 254-268.
  • FRIEDMAN, D.; (1987), "Economic Analysis Of Law", J. EAT WELL, M. MILGATE and P. K. NEWMAN (Ed.), In The New Palgrave: A Dictionary Of Economics, Macmillan, USA.
  • FURUBOTN, E. G. and S. PEJOVICH, (1974), The Economics Of Property Rights, Ballinger, Cambridge, MA. HALPIN, A.; (2007), "Disproving The Coase Theorem", Eco- nomics and Philosophy, 23(3), pp. 321-341.
  • HODGSON, G. M.; (2000), "What Is The Essence Of Institu- tional Economics?", Journal of Economic Issues, 34(2), pp. 329.
  • HOFFMAN, E. and M. L. SPITZER; (1982). The Coase Theo- rem: Some Experimental Tests", Journal of Law and Econom- ics, 25(1), pp. 73-98.
  • HOLDERNESS, C. G.; (1989). "The Assignment Of Rights, En- try Effects, And The Allocation Of Resources", The Journal of Legal Studies, 18(1), pp. 181-189.
  • IŞIKTAÇ Y. ve U. KOLOŞ; (2015), Hukuk Sosyolojisi, Bilgi Üni- versitesi Yayınları, İstanbul.
  • KAHNEMAN, D., KNETSCH, J. L. and R. H. THALER; (1990), "Experimental Tests Of The Endowment Effect And The Coase Theorem', Journal of Political Economy, 98(6), pp. 1325-1348.
  • KAMA, Ö.; (2011), "Yeni Kurumsal İktisat Okulunun Temelleri", Gazi Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 13(2), ss. 204.
  • KAPLOW, L., and S. SHAVELL; (2002), "Economic Analysis Of Law", A. J. AUERBACH and M. FELDSTEIN (Ed.), Hand- book Of Public Economics, Volume 3, Elsevier Science B.V., pp. 1661-1784.
  • KUECHLE, G. and D. Rios, (2012), "The Coase Theorem Re- considered: The Role Of Alternative Activities", International Review of Law and Economics, 32(1), pp. 129-134.
  • LEE, B. A. and H. E. SMITH; (2012), "The Nature Of Coasean Property", International Review of Economics, 59(2), pp. 145-
  • MACKAAY, E.; (2000), "History Of Law and Economics", B. BOUCKAERT and G. DE GEEST (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. 65-117.
  • MARCHAND, J. R. and K. P. RUSSELL; (1973). "Externalities, Liability, Separability, And Resource Allocation", The American Economic Review, 63(4), pp. 611-620.
  • MCKELVEY, R. and T. PAGE; (2000), "An Experimental Study Of The Effect Of Private Information In The Coase Theorem", Experimental Economics, 3(3), pp. 187-213.
  • MEDEMA, S.; (2011), "A Case Of Mistaken Identity: George Stigler, -The Problem Of Social Cost- And The Coase Theo- rem", European Journal of Law and Economics, 31(1), pp. 11-
  • MEDEMA, S. and R. O. Jr. ZERBE; (2000), "The Coase Theo- rem", B. BOUCKAERT and G. DE GEEST (Ed.), Encyclope- dia of Law and Economics, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar, pp. -892.
  • MURTY, S.; (2010), "Externalities And Fundamental Noncon- vexities: A Reconciliation Of Approaches To General Equilib- rium Externality Modeling And Implications For Decentraliza- tion", Journal of Economic Theory, 145(1), pp. 331-353.
  • ORHAN, S.; (2011), "Dünden Bugüne Kurumsal İktisat", E. EREN ve Metin SARFATİ (Ed.), İktisatta Yeni Yaklaşımlar İletişim Yayınları, İstanbul, Ankara, ss. 59-88.
  • PARISI, F.; (2004a), "Positive, Normative And Functional Schools In Law And Economics", European Journal of Law and Economics, 18(3), pp. 259-272.
  • PARISI, F.; (2004b), "The Law and Economics Movement", C. K. ROWLEY and F. SCHNEIDER (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Public Choice, Springer, US, pp. 665-667.
  • POLINSKY, A. M.; (1974), "Economic Analysis As A Potentially Defective Product: A Buyer's Guide To Posner's Economic Analysis Of Law', 87(8), Harvard Law Review, pp. 1655-1681.
  • POLINSKY, A. M. and S. SHAVELL; (2008), "Public Enforcement of Law, S. N. DURLAUF AND L. E. BLUME (Ed.), The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, Palgrave Macmillan, Baskingstoke, pp. 38-47.
  • POSNER, R. A.; (1972), Economic Analysis Of Law, Little, Brown and Company, Boston.
  • REGAN, D. H.; (1972), "The Problem Of Social Cost Revisited", Journal of Law and Economics, 15(2), pp. 427-437.
  • SHAPIRO, D. L; (1974), "A Note On Rent And The Coase Theorem", Journal of Economic Theory, 7(1), pp. 125-128.
  • SIMON, H. A.; (1955), "A Behavioral Model Of Rational Choice", The Quarterly Journal Of Economics, 69(1), pp. 99-118.
  • STARRETT, D. A.; (1972), "Fundamental Nonconvexities In The Theory Of Externalities", Journal of Economic Theory, 4(2), pp. 180-199.
  • STIGLER, G. J.; (1966), The Theory Of Price, Third Edition, Macmillan, New York.
  • ŞENALP, M. G.; (2007), "Dünden Bugüne Kurumsal İktisat". E. ÖZVEREN (Ed.), Kurumsal İktisat , İmge Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara, ss. 45-92.
  • USHER, D.; (1998), "The Coase Theorem Is Tautological, Incoherent Or Wrong", Economics Letters, 61(1), 3-11.
  • VON HAYEK, F. A.; (1937), "Economics And Knowledge", Economica, 4(13), pp. 33-54.
  • YILMAZ, F.; (2007), "Avrupa'da Kurumsal İktisat: G.M. Hodgson Örneği", E. ÖZVEREN (Ed.), Kurumsal İktisat, İmge Kitabevi Yayınları, Ankara, ss. 93-142.
  • YÜCEL, M. T.; (2004), Hukuk Sosyolojisi, Başkent Klişe Matbaacılık, Ankara.
  • ZELDER, M.; (1998), "The Cost of Accosting Coase: A Reconciliatory Survey Of Proofs and Disproofs Of The Coase Theorem", S. G. MEDEMA (Ed.), Coasean Economics: Law and Economics and the New Institutional Economics, Springer, Netherlands, pp. 65-94.
  • ZERBE, R. O. Jr.; (1980), "The Problem Of Social Cost In Retrospect", Research in Law and Economics, 2, 83-102.