Türk Toplumunda Dental Anomalilerin Görülme Sıklığı
Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı Türk toplumunda dental anomali görülme sıklığının cinsiyet ve yaşa göre araştırılmasıdır.Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada İstanbul Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Ağız, Diş-Çene Radyolojisi Anabilim Dalı’na başvuran, yaşları 9-35 yaş arasında değişen (ortalama yaş: 25.61±10.04) 2025 hastanın (885 erkek ve 1140 kadın) panoramik radyografileri geriye dönük olarak araştırılmıştır. Hastalar hipodonti, hiperdonti, mikrodonti, taurodontizm ve diğer kök anomalileri gibi dental anomalilerin varlığı açısından incelenmiştir. Bu anomalilerin görülme oranları cinsiyet ve yaşa göre değerlendirilmiştir.Bulgular: 2025 hastanın toplam 96’sının (42 erkek, 54 kadın) incelenen dental anomalilerden en az birine sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir (%4.74). en sık gözlenen dental anomali diş eksikliği olup (%1.77) bunu sırasıyla taurodontizm (%1.18), hiperdonti (%0.79), mikrodonti (%0.54) ve diğer kök anomalileri (%0.44) takip etmektedir.Sonuç: Diş eksikliği incelenen populasyonda en sık gözlenen gelişimsel dental anomali olup bunu taurodontizm takip etmektedir
THE PREVALENCE OF DENTAL ANOMALIES IN A TURKISH POPULATION
Purpose: The aim of the present study was to investigatethe prevalence of dental anomalies in a Turkishpopulation according to the gender and age.Materials and Methods: A retrospective study wasperformed using panoramic radiographs of 2025 patients(885 males and 1140 females) ranging in age from 9 to35 (mean age 25.61±10.04) years attending Departmentof Oral Radiology, University of Istanbul, Faculty ofDentistry. These patients were examined to determine thepresence of developmental dental anomalies involvinghypodontia, hyperdontia, microdontia, taurodontism andother root anomalies. The incidence of these anomalieswere assessed according to the gender and age.Results: Among the 2025 subjects, a total of 96individuals (42 males and 54 females) showed at leastone of the selected dental anomalies (4.74%). Toothagenesis was the most common dental abnormality(1.77%) followed by taurodontism (1.18%), hyperdontia(0.79%), microdontia (0.54%) and root anomalies(0.44%), respectively.Conclusion: Tooth agenesis is the most commondevelopmental dental anomaly in the studied Turkishpopulation followed by taurodontism.
___
- Kuchler EC, Risso PA, Costa Mde C, Modesto
- A, Vieira AR. Studies of dental anomalies in a
- large group of school children. Arch Oral Biol
- ;53(10):941-946.
- Altug-Atac AT, Erdem D. Prevalence and
- distribution of dental anomalies in orthodontic
- patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
- ;131(4):510-514.
- Basdra EK, Kiokpasoglou M, Stellzig A. The
- class ii division 2 craniofacial type is associated
- with numerous congenital tooth anomalies. Eur
- J Orthod 2000;22(5):529-535.
- Uslu O, Akcam MO, Evirgen S, Cebeci I.
- Prevalence of dental anomalies in various
- malocclusions. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop
- ;135(3):328-335.
- al-Emran S. Prevalence of hypodontia and
- developmental malformation of permanent teeth
- in saudi arabian schoolchildren. Br J Orthod
- ;17(2):115-118.
- Ooshima T, Ishida R, Mishima K, Sobue S.
- The prevalence of developmental anomalies
- of teeth and their association with tooth size
- in the primary and permanent dentitions of
- japanese children. Int J Paediatr Dent
- ;6(2):87-94.
- Thongudomporn U, Freer TJ. Prevalence of
- dental anomalies in orthodontic patients. Aust
- Dent J 1998;43(6):395-398.
- Mattheeuws N, Dermaut L, Martens G. Has
- hypodontia increased in caucasians during the
- th century? A meta-analysis. Eur J Orthod
- ;26(1):99-103.
- Polder BJ, Van’t Hof MA, Van der Linden FP,
- Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. A meta-analysis of the
- prevalence of dental agenesis of permanent
- teeth. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol
- ;32(3):217-226.
- De Oliveira Gomes C, Drummond SN, Jham
- BC, Abdo EN, Mesquita RA. A survey of 460
- supernumerary teeth in brazilian children and
- adolescents. Int J Paediatr Dent 2008;18(2):98-
- -
- Rajab LD, Hamdan MA. Supernumerary teeth:
- Review of the literature and a survey of 152
- cases. Int J Paediatr Dent 2002;12(4):244-254.
- Chen YH, Cheng NC, Wang YB, Yang CY.
- Prevalence of congenital dental anomalies in
- the primary dentition in taiwan. Pediatr Dent
- ;32(7):525-529.
- Kapdan A, Kustarci A, Buldur B, Arslan D,
- Kapdan A. Dental anomalies in the primary
- dentition of turkish children. Eur J Dent
- ;6(2):178-183.
- Celikoglu M, Kamak H, Oktay H. Prevalence
- and characteristics of supernumerary teeth in a
- non-syndrome turkish population: Associated
- pathologies and proposed treatment. Med Oral
- Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2010;15(4):e575-578.
- Gupta SK, Saxena P, Jain S, Jain D. Prevalence
- and distribution of selected developmental dental
- anomalies in an indian population. J Oral Sci
- ;53(2):231-238.
- Patil S, Doni B, Kaswan S, Rahman F. Prevalence
- of dental anomalies in indian population. J Clin
- Exp Dent 2013;5(4):e183-186.
- Brook AH. A unifying aetiological explanation
- for anomalies of human tooth number and size.
- Arch Oral Biol 1984;29(5):373-378.
- Ezoddini AF, Sheikhha MH, Ahmadi H.
- Prevalence of dental developmental anomalies:
- A radiographic study. Community Dent Health
- ;24(3):140-144.
- Bharti R, Chandra A, Tikku AP, Arya D.
- Prevalence of taurodont molars in a north indian
- population. Indian J Dent 2015;6(1):27-31.
- Darwazeh AM, Hamasha AA, Pillai K. Prevalence
- of taurodontism in jordanian dental patients.
- Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1998;27(3):163-165.
- Desai RS, Vanaki SS, Puranik RS, Rashmi
- GS, Nidawani P. An unusual combination of
- idiopathic generalized short-root anomaly
- associated with microdontia, taurodontia,
- multiple dens invaginatus, obliterated pulp
- chambers and infected cyst: A case report. J Oral
- Pathol Med 2006;35(7):407-409.
- Suprabha BS, Sumanth KN, Boaz K, George T.
- An unusual case of non-syndromic occurrence
- of multiple dental anomalies. Indian J Dent Res
- ;20(3):385-387.
- Nunn JH, Carter NE, Gillgrass TJ, Hobson
- RS, Jepson NJ, Meechan JG, Nohl FS. The
- interdisciplinary management of hypodontia:
- Background and role of paediatric dentistry. Br
- Dent J 2003;194(5):245-251.
- Muller TP, Hill IN, Peterson AC, Blayney JR. A
- survey of congenitally missing permanent teeth.
- J Am Dent Assoc 1970;81(1):101-107.
- Bergstrom K. An orthopantomographic study
- of hypodontia, supernumeraries and other
- anomalies in school children between the ages
- of 8-9 years. An epidemiological study. Swed
- Dent J 1977;1(4):145-157.
- Nordgarden H, Jensen JL, Storhaug K. Reported
- prevalence of congenitally missing teeth in two
- norwegian counties. Community Dent Health
- ;19(4):258-261.
- Rose JS. A survey of congenitally missing teeth,
- excluding third molars, in 6000 orthodontic
- patients. Dent Pract Dent Rec 1966;17(3):107-
- -
- Brook AH. Multilevel complex interactions
- between genetic, epigenetic and environmental
- factors in the aetiology of anomalies of dental
- development. Arch Oral Biol 2009;54 Suppl
- :S3-17.
- Kondo S, Townsend GC. Associations between
- carabelli trait and cusp areas in human permanent
- maxillary first molars. Am J Phys Anthropol
- ;129(2):196-203.
- Daley TD, Wysocki GP, Bohay RN. Osteopathia
- striata, short stature, cataracts, and microdontia:
- A new syndrome? A case report. Oral Surg
- Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod
- ;81(3):356-360.
- Silverman NE, Ackerman JL. Oligodontia: A
- study of its prevalence and variation in 4032
- children. ASDC J Dent Child 1979;46(6):470-
- -