___

• Adams, R. S., Turns, J., & Atman, C. J. (2003). Educating effective engineering designers: The role of reflective practice. Design Studies, 24(3), 275-294.
• Adler, S. A. (1993). Teacher education: Research as reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 9(2), 159-167.
• Bailyn, L. (1977). Research as a cognitive process: Implications for data analysis. Quality and quantity, 11, 97-107.
• Barrett, J. L., & Lanman, J. A. (2008). The science of religious beliefs. Religion, 38(2008), 109-124.
• Belbase, S. (2015). Preservice secondary mathematics teachers’ beliefs about teaching geometric transformations using Geometer’s Sketchpad. Doctoral dissertation, University of Wyoming, Laramie, WY, USA.
• Bergkamp, J. (2010). The paradox of emotionality and competence in multicultural competency training: A grounded theory. A doctoral dissertation, Antioch University, Seattle, WA, USA. Bouma, R. (1997). Process theology/John B. Cobb, Jr. The Boston Collaborative Encyclopedia of Modern Western Theology. Online retrieved from: http://people.bu.edu/wwildman/bce/mwt_themes_850_cobb.htm#Process Theology/John B. Cobb, Jr.
• Bourdieu, P. (2001). Meditações pascalianas. Translated by Sergio Miceli. Rio de Janeiro: Bertrand Brasil. Original publication: Méditations pascaliennes. Paris: Éditions du Seuil, 1997.
• Braude, S. E. (1995). First person plural: Multiple personality and the philosophy of mind. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.
• Bucciarelli, L. L. (1984). Reflective practice in engineering design. Design Studies, 5(3), 185-190.
• Campbell, D. (2010). A theory of consciousness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of Arizona.
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Chen, R. J. (2011). Preservice mathematics teachers’ ambiguous views of technology. School Science and Mathematics, 111(2), 56-67.
• Corbin, J. M., & Strauss, A. L. (2008). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
• Cuevas, G. J. (2010). Integrating technology in the mathematics classroom. In K. Cennamo, J. Ross, & P. Ertmer (Eds.), Technology integration for meaningful classroom use: A standard-based approach (pp. 369-386). Belmont, CA: WADSWORTH.
• Davies, B., & Harre, R. (1990). Positioning: The discursive production of selves. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 20, 43-63.
• Dewey, J. (1933). How we think? Buffalo, NY: Prometheus Books.
• Duffy, A. (2009). Guiding students through reflective practice – the preceptors’ experiences: A qualitative descriptive study. Nurse Education in Practice, 9(3), 166-175.
• Eacott, S. (2013). Research as a political activity: The fallacy of data speaking for themselves. Leadership and Policy Quarterly, 2(4), 223-235. Edwards, A. (1999). Reflective practice in sport management. Sport Management Review, 2(1), 67-81. Emmerich, N. (2014). Bourdieu’s collective enterprise of inculcation: The moral socialization and ethical enculturation of medical students. British Journal of Sociology of Education. DOI: 10.1080/01425692.2014.886939
• Engel, P. (2000). Introduction: The varieties of beliefs and acceptance. In P. Engel (Ed.), Believing and accepting (pp. 1-30). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers
• Erens, R., & Eichler, A. (2015). Beliefs and technology. In C. Bernack-Schüler, R. Erens, A. Eichler, & T. Leuders (Eds), Views and beliefs in mathematics education: Results of the 19th MAVI Conference (pp. 133 – 144). Germany: Springer Spektrum.
• Ertmer, P. A. (2006). Teacher pedagogical beliefs and classroom technology use: A critical link. Online reseource document retrieved on May 24, 2013 from: http://www.edci.purdue.edu/ertmer/docs/AERA06_TchrBeliefs.pdf
• Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computer & Education, 59(2012), 423-435. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.001
• Fletcher, S. (1997). Modeling reflective practice for preservice teachers: The role of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 13(2), 237-243.
• Foley, J. A., & Ojeda, C. (2007). How do teacher beliefs influence technology use in the classroom? In R. Carlsen, K. McFerrin, J. Price, R. Weber, & D. A. Willis (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 796-801). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
• Friedhoff, S., Zu Verl, C. M., Pietsch, C., Meyer, C., Vomprass, J., & Liebig, S. (2013). Social research data: Documentation, management, and technical implementation within the SFB 882. SFB 882 Working Paper Series, 16 (February). Online available from: http://www.sfb882.uni-bielefeld.de/
• Garry, T. (1997). Geometer’s Sketchpad in the classroom. In J. R. King & D. Schattschneider (Eds.), Geometry turned on! Dynamic software in learning, teaching, and research (pp. 55-62). Washington, D. C.: The Mathematical Association of America.
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.
• Goldin, G. A. (2000). A scientific perspective on structured, task-based interviews in mathematics education research. In A.E. Kelly & R.A. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 35-44). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Groarke, S. (2014). Managed lives: Psychoanalysis, inner security, and the social order. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Hall, R. (2008). Applied social research: Planning, designing, and conducting real-world research. Sydney, Australia: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Harford, J., & MacRuairc, G. (2008). Engaging student teachers in meaningful reflective practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(7), 1884-1892.
• Hargreaves, J. (2004). So how do you feel about that? Assessing reflective practice. Nurse Education Today, 24(3), 196-201.
• Hertz, R. (Ed.). (1997). Reflexivity and voice. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
• Hunter, J. (2015). Technology integration and high possibility classrooms: Building from TPACK. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Jansen, A. (2008). An investigation of relationships between seventh-grade students’ beliefs and their participation during mathematics discussions in two classrooms. Mathematics Thinking and Learning, 10, 68-100.
• Jarvis, P. (1992). Reflective practice and nursing. Nurse Education Today, 12(3), 174-181.
• Jaworski, B. (2006). Theory and practice in mathematics teaching development: Critical inquiry as a mode of learning in teaching. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 187-211. Jovchelovitch, S. (1996). In defense of representation. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 26, 121-136.
• Kwanvig, J. (2013). Perspectivalism and reflective ascent. In D. Christensen & J. Lackey (Eds.), The epistemology of disagreement: New essays (pp. 223-242). Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.
• Layder, D. (1998). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. London, U. K.: SAGE.
• Leikin, R., & Zazkis, R. (2010). Teachers’ opportunities to learn mathematics through teaching. In R. Leikin & R. Zazkis (Eds.), Learning through teaching mathematics: Development of teachers’ knowledge and expertise in practice (pp. 3-21). New York, NY: Springer.
• Lichtenstein, B. B. (2000). The matrix of complexity: A multi-disciplinary approach for studying emergence in coevolution. Online retrieved on January 20, 2014 from: http://www.hsdinstitute.org/learn-more/library/articles/MatrixOfComplexity.pdf
• Lin, C. Y. (2008). Beliefs about using technology in the mathematics classroom: Interviews with preservice elementary teachers. Eurasian Journal of Mathematics, Science, & Technology Education, 4(2), 135-142.
• Lizardo, O., & Strand, M. (2011). Beyond ‘world images’: Beliefs as embodied action in the world. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, Caesar’s Palace, Las Vegas, NV.
• Loughran, J. (2002). Effective reflective practice: In search of meaning in learning about teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 63(1), 33-43.
• Lowery, N. V. (2003). The fourth “R”: Reflection. The Mathematics Educator, 13(2), 23-31.
• Maher, C. A. (1998). Constructivism and constructivist teaching: Can they co-exist? In O. Bjorkqvist (Ed.), Mathematics teaching from a constructivist point of view (pp. 29 – 42). Finland: Abo Akademi.
• Mauther, N. S., & Doucet, A. (2003). Reflexive accounts and accounts of reflexivity in qualitative data analysis. Sociology, 37(3), 413-431.
• Medeiros, E., & Capela, J. (2010). Processes of identity-building in the Zambesi Valley: Ethnic solidarity and the Zambesian ethos. In A. Keese (Ed.), Ethnicity and the long-term perspective: The African experience (pp. 35-66). Bern, Switzerland: International Academic Publishers.
• Misfeldt, M., Jankvist, U. T., & Aguilar, M. S. (2016). Teacher beliefs about the discipline of mathematics and the use of technology in the classroom. Mathematics Education, 11(2), 395-419. doi: 10.12973/iser.2016.2113a
• Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A new framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017-1054.
• Nozick, R. (1983). Philosophical explanations. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Pierre, E. A. (2009). Decentering voice in qualitative inquiry. In A. Y. Jackson & L. A. Mazzei (Eds.), Voice in qualitative inquiry: Challenging conventional, interpretive, and critical conceptions in qualitative research (pp. 221-236). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Polly, D. (Ed.). (2015). Cases on technology integration in mathematics education. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
• Richard, M. (2013). Context and the attitudes: Meaning in context. Oxford, U. K.: Oxford University Press.
• Rodwell, M. K. (1998). Social work constructivist research. New York, NY: Garland Publishing Inc. Romdenh-Romluc, R. (2007). Suppressed beliefs. Theoria, 58, 17-24.
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 100-121.
• Smitherman, S. E. (2006). Reflections on teaching a mathematics education course. Doctoral dissertation, Louisiana State University.
• Sperber, D. (1997). Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind and Language, 12(1), 67-83.
• Steffe, L. P. (2002). The constructivist teaching experiment: Illustrations and implications. In E. von Glasersfeld (Ed.), Radical constructivism in mathematics education (pp. 177 – 194). New York, NY: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Steffe, L. P., & Thompson, P. W. (2000). Teaching experiment methodology: Underlying principles and essential elements. In R. Lesh & A. E. Kelly (Eds.), Research design in mathematics and science education (pp. 267 – 307). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Thompson, S., & Thompson, N. (2008). The critically reflective practitioner. New York, NY: Palgrave MacMillan.
• Tremlin, T. (2006). Minds and gods: The cognitive foundations of religion. Oxford Scholarship Online. DOI: 10.1093/0195305345.001.0001
• Van der Hart, O., Nijenhuis, E. R., & Steele, K. (2006). The haunted self: Structural dissociation and the treatment of chronic traumatization. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.
• Van Manen, M. (1991). The tact of teaching: The meaning of pedagogical thoughtfulness. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1978). Radical constructivism and Piaget's concept of knowledge. Inn F. B. Murray (Ed.), The impact of Piagetian theory (pp. 109-122). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1990). An exposition of constructivism: Why some like it radical. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher, & N. Noddings (Eds.), Constructivist views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 19-29). Reston, VA: NCTM.
• von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. New York, NY: Routledge Falmer.
• Warfield, H. A. (2013). The therapeutic value of pilgrimage: A grounded theory study North Carolina State University. A doctoral dissertation, Raleigh, North Carolina. Welsh, R. (2009). International barriers to small business development: A study of independent retailers from the Edinburgh South Asian Community. Doctoral dissertation, Queen Margaret University.
• Whittock, T. (1997). Reflexive teaching, reflexive learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 2(2), 93-102. DOI: 10.1080/1356251970020201
• Wilson, S. M., Shulman, L. S., & Richert, A. E. (1987). 150 different ways of knowing: Representations of knowledge in teaching. In J. Calderhead (Ed.), Exploring Teachers’ Thinking (pp. 104 – 124). London: Cassell.
• Zimmermann, K. (2010). Gender knowledge under construction: The case of the European Union’s science and research policy. In B. Riegraft, B. Aulenbacher, Kirsch-Auwärter, & Müller (Eds.), Gender change in academia: Remapping the fields of work, knowledge, and politics from a gender perspective (pp. 173-188). Sabine Schöller, Germany: Springer Fachmedien.