Kompozit rezinlerin su emilimi ve çözünürlüğü üzerine gargaralarin etkisi
Bu çalışmada, mikrohibrid Dynamic Plus ve nanoseramik Zenit yapıdaki iki farklı kompozit rezinin su emilimi ve çözünürlüğü üzerine alkol içeren Listerine Cool Mint ve içermeyen Signal White Now iki farklı ağız gargarasının 1 ve 7 gün sonundaki etkisinin değerlendirilmesi amaçlanmıştır. Her bir kompozit rezin için 30 adet örnek hazırlandı 10mmx2mm ve örnekler, her grupta 10 adet olacak şekilde rastgele 3 gruba ayrıldı. Piyasada bulunan iki farklı ağız gargarası alkol içeren Listerine Cool Mint ve alkol içermeyen Signal White Now test solüsyonu olarak, distile su ise kontrol grubu olarak seçildi. Tüm örnekler, kompozit rezinlerden nemin uzaklaşmasını sağlamak için desikatörde 37±1˚C'de 22 saat, daha sonra 23±1˚C'deki fırında 2 saat bekletildi. Her bir örneğin ağırlığı ve hacmi hesaplandı. Örnekler 1 gün ve 7 gün süreyle 37 ± 1 ºC'de etüvde 10 ml gargara/distile su ile dolu plastik şişelere konuldu. 1 gün ve 7 gün sonunda sıvıların içerisinden alınan her bir örnek hassas terazide tekrar tartıldı. Su emilimi ve çözünürlük değerlerinin hesaplanması BS EN ISO 4049:2000 standart metoduna dayanarak yapıldı. Veriler istatiksel olarak tek yönlü varyans analizi oneway-ANOVA ve Tukey HSD testi değerlendirildi. Tüm istatistiksel analizler için α=0.05 seviyesi anlamlı kabul edildi. İstatiksel analiz sonuçlarına göre, 1.gün ve 7.gün sonunda en yüksek su emilim değerlerini Dynamic Plus kompozit rezin Listerine Cool Mint gargarada, Zenit kompozit rezin ise Signal White Now gargarada bekletildiğinde göstermiştir. Çözünürlük değerleri açısından bakıldığında, her iki kompozit rezinde de hem gargaralarda hem de distile suda çözünürlük değerleri negatif olarak elde edilmiştir. Hem su emilimi hem de çözünürlük değerleri ISO 4049:2000 standartlarında belirlenmiş sınırlardan oldukça düşük bulunmuştur.
The Effect of Mouthrinses on Water Sorption And Solubility of Composite Resins
In this study, the effect of two different mouthrinses, alcohol containing Listerine Cool Mint and alcohol-free Signal White Now mouthrinses, on the sorption and solubility of a microhybrid Dynamic Plus and a nanoceramic Zenit composite resins after 1 and 7 days storage was investigated. 30 disc-shaped 10mm x 2mm specimens for each composite resin were prepared. The discs for each dental composites were randomly assigned to 3 groups n=10 . The test solutions were selected as commercially avaible alcohol containing mouthrinse Listerine Cool Mint and alcohol-free mouthrinse Signal White Now , distilled water was used as the control. The specimens were dessicated for 22 hours at 37±1˚C and then placed in an oven for 2 hours at 23±1˚C. The mass and volume for each specimen were calculated. The specimens were individually placed in plactic vials by immersing 10 ml of mouthrinse / distilled water at 37±1 ºC for 1 day and 7 days. At the end of 1 day and 7 days, each disc was reweighed by using analytic balance. The sorption and solubility values were calculated based on BS EN ISO 4049:2000. The data were analyzed with One-Way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests α=0.05 . According to the statistical analysis results, Dynamic Plus composite resin exposed to Listerine Cool Mint mouthrinse and Zenit composite resin exposed to Signal White Now mouthrinse showed the highest sorption values at the end of 1st and 7th day. The solubility values of both composite resins were negative. On comparing the results with ISO 4049:2000 requirement, it was obtained that all composites showed lower sorption and solubility values than maximum requiremen
___
- 1. Ferracane JL. Resin composite--state of
the art. Dent Mater. 2011;27(1):29-38.
- 2. Ferracane JL Current trends in dental
composites. Crit Rev Oral Biol
Med. 1995;6(4):302-18.
- 3. Ilie N, Hickel R. Resin composite
restorative materials. Aust Dent
J. 2011;56 Suppl 1:59-66.
- 4. Mahmoud SH, El-Embaby AE, AbdAllah
AM. Clinical performance of ormocer,
nanofilled, and nanoceramic resin
composites in Class I and Class II
restorations: a three-year evaluation. Oper
Dent 2014;39(1):32-42.
- 5. Ozer S, Sen Tunc E, Tuloglu N, Bayrak S.
Solubility of two resin composites in
different mouthrinses. Biomed Res Int
2014;2014:580675.
- 6. Dos Santos PA, Garcia PP, De Oliveira
AL, Chinelatti MA, Palma-Dibb RG.
Chemical and morphological features of
dental composite resin: influence of light
curing units and immersion media.
Microsc Res Tech 2010;73(3):176-81.
- 7. Ferracane JL. Hygroscopic and hydrolytic
effects in dental polymer networks. Dent
Mater 2006;22(3):211-22.
- 8. Al Sunbul H, Silikas N, Watts DC. Resinbased composites show similar kinetic
profiles for dimensional change and
recovery with solvent storage. Dent
Mater 2015;31(10):e201-17.
- 9. Curtis AR, Shortall AC, Marquis PM,
Palin WM. Water uptake and strength
characteristics of a nanofilled resin-based
composite. J Dent 2008;36(3):186-93.
- 10. Yap AU, Tan BW, Tay LC, Chang KM,
Loy TK, Mok BY. Effect of mouthrinses
on microhardness and wear of composite
and compomer restoratives. Oper Dent
2003;28(6): 740-6.
- 11. Benetti AR, Peutzfeldt A, Asmussen E,
Pallesen U, Franco EB. Influence of
curing rate on softening in ethanol, degree
of conversion, and wear of resin
composite Am J Dent 2011; 24(2): 115-8.
- 12. de Moraes Porto IC, das Neves LE, de
Souza CK, Parolia A, Barbosa dos Santos
N. A comparative effect of mouthwashes
with different alcohol concentrations on
surface ardness, sorption and solubility of
composite resins. Oral Health Dent
Manag 2014;13(2):502-6.
- 13. Lee SY, Huang HM, Lin CY, and Shih
YH. Leached components form dental
composites in oral simulating fluids and
the resultant composite strengths. J Oral
Rehabil 1998; 25 (8):575–88.
- 14. Sideridou ID, Karabela MM, Vouvoudi
EC. Dynamic thermomechanical properties and sorption characteristics of two
commercial light cured dental resin
composites. Dent Mater 2008;24 (6):737–
43.
- 15. Moran JM, Chemical plaque controlprevention for the masses. Periodontology
2000; 15:109–17.
- 16. Bhatti SA, Walsh TF, and Douglas
CW. Ethanol and pH levels of proprietary
mouthrinses. Community Dent Health
1994; 11(2):71–4.
- 17. Elmar R, Petersson LG, Netuschil L,
Brecx M, Mouthrinses and dental caries.
Int Dent J 2002; 52 (5): 337-45
- 18. Almeida GS, Poskus LT, Guimarães
JG, da Silva EM. The effect of
mouthrinses on salivary sorption,solubility and surface degradation of a
nanofilled and a hybrid resin composite.
Oper Dent 2010;35(1):105-11.
- 19. Food and Drug Administration. FDA
Guidelines for chemistry and technology
requirements of indirect additive petitions.
Department of Health, Education and
Welfare,(1976) Washington DC, USA:
p.:11.
- 20. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio
E, Aguilera FS, Romeo A, de la Higuera
B, García-Godoy F. Sorption and
solubility testing of orthodontic bonding
cements in different solutions. J Biomed
Mater Res B Appl Biomater.
2006;76(2):251-6.
- 21. Alrahlah A, Silikas N, Watts DC.
Hygroscopic expansion kinetics of dental
resin-composites. Dent Mater 2014;30
(2):143-8.
- 22. Archegas LR, Caldas DB, Rached
RN, Vieira S, Souza EM. Sorption
and solubility of composites cured with
quartz-tungsten halogen and light emitting
diode light-curing units. J Contemp Dent
Pract. 2008;1;9(2):73-80.
- 23. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz NM, Fisher AC.
Hygroscopic expansion and solubility of
composite restoratives. Dent Mater
2003;19(2):77-86
- 24. Palin WM, Fleming GJ, Burke FJ,
Marquis PM, Randall RC.
The influence of short and medium-term
water immersion on the hydrolytic
stability of novel low-shrink dental
composites. Dent Mater 2005;21(9):852-
63.
- 25. Alshali RZ, Salim NA, Satterthwaite JD,
Silikas N. Long-term sorption and
solubility of bulk-fill and conventional
resin-composites in water and artificial
saliva. J Dent 2015;43(12):1511-8.
- 26. Örtengren U, Wellendorf H, Karlsson S,
Ruyter IE. Water sorption and solubility
of dental composites and identification of
monomers released in an aqueous environment. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28
(12):1106–15.
- 27. Örtengren U, Langer S, Göransson A,
Lundgren T. Influence of pH and time on
organic substance release from a model
dental composite: a fluorescence
spectrophotometry and gas
chromatography/mass spectrometry
analysis. Eur J Oral Sci 2004; 112 (6):
530–7.
- 28. Rahim TN, Mohamad D, Akil H, Rahman
I. Water sorption characteristics of
restorative dental composites immersed in
acidic drinks. Dent Mater 2012;28(6):e63-
70.
- 29. Burrow MF, Inokoshi S, Tagami J.
Water sorption of several bonding resins.
Am J Dent 1999;12(6):295-8.
- 30. Fontes ST, Fernández MR, de Moura
CM, Meireles SS. Color stability of a
nanofill composite: effect of different
immersion media. J Appl Oral
Sci 2009;17(5):388-91.
- 31. da Silva EM, Gonçalves L, Guimarães
JG, Poskus LT, Fellows CE.
The diffusion kinetics of a nanofilled and
a midifilled resin composite immersed in
distilled water, artificial saliva, and lactic
acid. Clin Oral Investig 2011;15(3):393-
401.
- 32. Gonçalves L, Noronha Filho JD,
Guimarães JG, Poskus LT, Silva EM.
Solubility, salivary sorption and degree of
conversion of dimethacrylate-based
polymeric matrixes. J Biomed Mater Res
B Appl Biomater 2008;85(2):320-5.
- 33. da Silva EM, Almeida GS, Poskus LT,
Guimarães JG. Relationship between the
degree of conversion, solubility and
salivary sorption of a hybrid and a
nanofilled resin composite. J Appl Oral
Sci 2008;16(2):161-6.
- 34. Ayatollahi MR, Yahya MY, Karimzadeh
A, Nikkhooyifar M, Ayob A. Effects of
temperature change and beverage on
mechanical and tribological properties of
dental restorative composites. Mater Sci
Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2015;54:69-75.
- 35. Kalachandra S, Wilson TW.
Water sorption and mechanical properties of light-cured proprietary composite tooth
restorative materials. Biomaterials
1992;13(2):105-9.
- 36. Kahraman R. Effects of the aluminum
filler content on moisture diffusion into
epoxy adhesives in distilled water and sea
water. J Appl Polym Sci 2005;98
(3):1165–71.
- 37. Gau DJ, Krause EA. Etching effect of
topical fluorides on dental porcelains: a
preliminary study. J Can Dent Assoc
(Tor). 1973;39(6):410-5.
- 38. von Fraunhofer JA, Kelley JI, DePaola
LG, Meiller TF. The effect of
a mouthrinse containing essential oils on
dental restorative materials. Gen
Dent 2006;54(6):403-7.
- 39. Martosa J, Osinagaa PWR, de Oliveirab
E, de Castroc LAS. Hydrolytic
Degradation of Composite Resins: Effects
on the Microhardness. Materials Res
2003; 6(4): 599-604.
- 40. Örtengren U, Andersson F, Elgh U,
Terselius B, Karlsson S. Influence of pH
and storage time on the sorption and
solubility behaviour of three composite
resin materials. J Dent 2001;29(1):35-41.
- 41. Prakki A, Cilli R, Mondelli RF,
Kalachandra S, Pereira JC.
Influence of pH environment on polymer
based dental material properties. J
Dent 2005;33(2):91-8.
- 42. Asmussen E. Softening of BISGMAbased polymers by ethanol and by organic
acids of plaque. Scand J Dent
Res 1984;92(3):257-61.
- 43. Weiner R, Millstein P, Hoang E, Marshall
D. The effect of alcoholic and
nonalcoholic mouthwashes on heattreated composite resin. Oper Dent
1997;22(6):249-53.
- 44. McKinney JE, Wu W.
Chemical softening and wear of dental
composites. J Dent
Res 1985;64(11):1326-31.
- 45. Hahnel S, Henrich A, Bürgers R, Handel
G, Rosentritt M. Investigation of
mechanical properties of modern dental
composites after artificial aging for one
year. Oper Dent 2010;35(4):412-9.
- 46. Sarrett DC, Coletti DP, Peluso AR. The
effects of alcoholic beverages on
composite wear. Dent Mater
2000;16(1):62-7.
- 47. Malacarne J, Carvalho RM, de Goes
MF, Svizero N, Pashley DH, Tay FR, Yiu
CK, Carrilho MR. ater sorption/solubility
of dental adhesive resins. Dent
Mater 2006;22(10):973-80.
- 48. Lopes LG, Jardim Filho Ada V, de Souza
JB, Rabelo D, Franco EB, de Freitas GC.
Influence of pulse-delay curing on
sorption and solubility of a composite
resin. J Appl Oral Sci 2009;17(1):27-31.
- 49. Mathias P, Santos SR, Aguiar TR, Santos
PR, Cavalcanti AN. Cigarette smoke:
effects on water sorption and solubility of
restorative dental composites. Gen
Dent 2014;62(2):54-7.
- 50. Münchow EA, Ferreira AC, Machado
RM, Ramos TS, Rodrigues-Junior
SA, Zanchi CH. Effect of acidic solutions
on the surface degradation of a microhybrid composite resin. Braz Dent
J 2014;25(4):321-6.
- 51. International Organization for
Standardization. BS EN ISO 4049:2000
polymer-based filling, restorative and
luting materials. Brussels; 2000.