Ceren Özge BİÇER, Nuray ATTAR, Yonca KORKMAZ

3712

Farklı polisaj tekniklerinin estetik kompozitlerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerine etkileri

Amaç: Bu in vitro çalışmanın amacı, iki farklı tek aşamalı polisaj sistemi ve geleneksel çok aşamalı bir disk sistemi ile bitirme ve polisaj işlemleri yapılmış estetik kompozitlerin yüzey pürüzlülüklerini değerlendirmektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmada kullanılan kompozitler Filtek Ultimate 3M ESPE Grup 1 , Amaris Voco Grup 2 ve Esthet•X® HD Dentsply Grup 3 . Şeffaf bant ile kapatılmış plastik cam kalıplarda toplam 120 örnek hazırlanmıştır. Polimerizasyonun ardından, her grup için polisaj işlemi uygulanmayan 10 örnek, kontrol grubu a olarak belirlenmiştir. Her bir kompozit grubu için n=30 , örnekler rastgele 3 polisaj sistemi grubuna ayrılmıştır: Enhance Dentsply b , OptraPol Vivadent c ve Sof-Lex 3M ESPE d . Tüm polisaj sistemleri üretici firmaların önerileri doğrultusunda uygulanmıştır. Yüzey pürüzlülüğü değerleri bir profilometre ile belirlenmiştir. Bulgular: Esthet•X® HD dışındaki tüm kompozit gruplarında en düzgün yüzeyler şeffaf bant ile elde edilmiştir p
Anahtar Kelimeler:

Polisaj, yüzey pürüzlülüğü, kompozit

The Effects of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness of Esthetic Composites

Objective: The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the surface roughness of esthetic composites finished and polished with two different one-step polishing systems and a conventional multi-step disc system. Materials and Methods: The composites evaluated were Filtek Ultimate 3M ESPE , Amaris Voco and Esthet•X® HD Dentsply . A total of 120 specimens were fabricated in a plexiglass mold covered with a Mylar strip. After polymerization, ten specimens per group received no polishing treatment and served as the control group. For each composite group n=30 , the specimens were randomly divided into three polishing systems: Enhance Dentsply , OptraPol Vivadent and SofLex 3M . All polishing systems were applied according to the manufacturers' instructions. The surface roughness values were determined using a profilometer. Results: The smoothest surfaces were achieved under Mylar strips in all composite groups p
Keywords:

Polishing, surface roughness, composite.,

PDF

___

  • Yap AU, Yap SH, Teo CK, Ng JJ. Fi- nishing/polishing of composite and compomer restoratives: Effectiveness of one-step systems. Oper Dent 2004; 29: 275-9.
  • Hosoya Y, Shiraishi T, Odatsu T, Na- gafuji J, Kotaku M, Miyazaki M, Powers JM. Effects of polishing on surface roughness, gloss, and color of resin composites. J Oral Sci. 2011; 53: 283-91.
  • Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Aksoy G. The influence of one-step polishing systems on the surface roughness and microhardness of nanocomposites. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 44-50.
  • Watanabe T, Miyazaki M, Takamiza- wa T, Kurokawa H, Rikuta A, Ando S. Influ- ence of polishing duration on surface rough- ness of resin composites. J Oral Sci 2005; 47: 21-5.
  • Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N, Karabu- lut E. Effect of one-step polishing systems on surface roughness of different flowable res- torative materials. Dent Mater J 2008; 27: 755- 64.
  • Jung M, Sehr K, Klimek J. Surface texture of four nanofilled an done hybrid com- posite after finishing. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 45- 52.
  • Xu HH, Weir MD, Sun L, Moreau JL, Takagi S, Chow LC, Antonucci JM. Strong nanocomposites with Ca, PO(4), and F release for caries inhibition. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 19- 28.
  • Chen MH. Update on dental nanocom- posites. J Dent Res 2010; 89: 549-60.
  • Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An ap- plication of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003; 134: 1382- 90.
  • Attar N. The effect of finishing and po- lishing procedures on the surface roughness of composite resin materials. J Contemp Dent Pract 2007; 8: 27-35.
  • Jefferies SR. Abrasive finishing and polishing in restorative dentistry: a state-of- the-art review. Dent Clin North Am 2007; 51: 379-97.
  • Ergücü Z, Türkün LS. Surface rough- ness of novel resin composites polished with one-step systems. Oper Dent 2007; 32: 185-92.
  • Bollen CM, Lambrechts P, Quirynen M. Comparison of surface roughness of oral hard materials to the threshold surface rough- ness for bacterial plaque retention: a review of the literature. Dent Mater 1997; 13: 258-69.
  • Ono M, Nikaido T, Ikeda M, Imai S, Hanada N, Tagami J, Matin K. Surface proper- ties of resin composite materials relative to bio- film formation. Dent Mater J 2007; 26: 613-22.
  • Kakaboura A, Fragouli M, Rahiotis C, Silikas N. Evaluation of surface characteristics of dental composites using profilometry, scan- ning electron, atomic force microscopy and gloss-meter. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2007; 18: 155-63.
  • Patel SB, Gordan VV, Barrett AA, Shen C. The effect of surface finishing and sto- rage solutions on the color stability of resin- based composites. J Am Dent Assoc 2004; 135: 587-94.
  • Mei L, Busscher HJ, van der Mei HC, Ren Y. Influence of surface roughness on streptococcal adhesion forces to composite re- sins. Dent Mater 2011; 27: 770-8.
  • Ryba TM, Dunn WJ, Murchison DF. Surface roughness of various packable compo- sites. Oper Dent 2002; 27: 243-7.
  • Da Costa J, Adams-Belusko A, Riley K, Ferracane JL. The effect of various denti- frices on surface roughness and gloss of resin composites. J Dent 2010;38 Suppl 2:e123-8.
  • Turssi CP, Saad JR, Duarte SL Jr, Ro- drigues AL Jr. Composite surfaces after finish- ing and polishing techniques. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 136-8.
  • Berger SB, Palialol AR, Cavalli V, Giannini M. Surface roughness and staining susceptibility of composite resins after finish- ing and polishing. J Esthet Restor Dent 2011; 23: 34-43.
  • K. Bashetty, S. Joshi. The effect of one-step and multi-step polishing systems on surface texture of two different resin compo- sites. J Conserv Dent 2010; 13: 34-8.
  • Ergücü Z, Türkün LS, Aladag A. Color stability of nanocomposites polished with one- step systems. Oper Dent 2008; 33: 413-20.
  • Paravina RD, Roeder L, Lu H, Vogel K, Powers JM. Effect of finishing and polish- ing procedures on surface roughness, gloss and color of resin-based composites. Am J Dent 2004; 17: 262-6.
  • Yap AU, Lye KW, Sau CW. Surface characteristics of tooth-colored restoratives po- lished utilizing different polishing systems. Oper Dent 1997; 22: 260-5.
  • Willems G, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vuylsteke-Wauters M, Vanherle G. The sur- face roughness of enamel-to-enamel contact areas compared with the intrinsic roughness of dental resin composites. J Dent Res 1991; 70: 1299-305.
  • Chung KH. Effects of finishing and polishing procedures on the surface texture of resin composites. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 325- 30.
  • Weitman RT, Eames WB. Plaque ac- cumulation on composite surfaces after various finising procedures. J Am Dent Assoc 1975; 91: 101-6.
  • Shintani H, Satou J, Satou N, Hayashi- hara H, Inoue T. Effects of various finishing methods on staining and accumulation of Streptococcus mutans HS-6 on composite re- sins. Dent Mater 1985; 1: 225-7.
European Annals of Dental Sciences-Cover
  • Yayın Aralığı: Yıllık
  • Başlangıç: 1972
  • Yayıncı: Ankara Üniversitesi
Arşiv
Sayıdaki Diğer Makaleler

Cerrahi destekli unileteral maksiller genisletme: bir olgu sunumu

Çağrı ULUSOY, Çağrı TÜRKÖZ, Erkan ERKMEN

Güncel bir cam iyonomer restoratif sistemin 24-aylık klinik performansının değerlendirilmesi

Esra FIRAT, Sevil GÜRGAN, Zeynep Bilge KÜTÜK, Filiz Yalçın ÇAKIR, Sema Seval ÖZTAS

Ortodonti’de ağrının önemi

Sıla ÇAĞLAYAN, Burcu BALOS TUNCER

Farklı polisaj tekniklerinin estetik kompozitlerin yüzey pürüzlülüğü üzerine etkileri

Ceren Özge BİÇER, Nuray ATTAR, Yonca KORKMAZ

Sert damakta periferal osteoma: vaka raporu

Ömür DERECİ, Timur SONGÜR, Serkan DADAKOĞLU, Adnan ÖZTÜRK

Füzyonlu maksiller lateral disin multidisipliner tedavisi: olgu sunumu

Tuğba KAYASU, Merve AKÇAY, Bengisu GERGİN, M. Okan AKÇAM