The effects of dietary supplementation of false flax (Camelina sativa L.) meal on performance, egg quality traits, and lipid peroxidation in laying quails

Amaç: Bu araştırma yumurtacı bıldırcın rasyonlarına ketencik (Camelina sativa L.) küspesi ilavesinin performans ve yumurta kalite özellikleri ile serum ve yumurtada lipid peroksidasyon üzerine etkisini belirlemek amacıyla yapıldı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmada toplam 240 adet (160 dişi ve 80 erkek) sekiz haftalık Japon bıldırcını (Coturnix coturnix japonica) her biri 48 bıldırcından oluşan 1 kontrol ve 4 deneme grubuna ayrıldı. Her bir grup da 12 bıldırcından oluşan 4 alt gruba ayrıldı. Kontrol grubu ketencik küspesi (KK) ilavesi yapılmayan (%0 KK) soya fasülyesi küspesi temeline dayanan temel rasyonla beslendi. Deneme gruplarının rasyonlarında KK %5 (KK5), 10 (KK10), 15 (KK15) ve 20 (KK20) düzeylerinde kullanıldı. Araştırma 8 haftada tamamlandı.Bulgular: Araştırmada yem tüketiminin KK15 ve KK20 gruplarında en düşük olduğu belirlendi (P

Yumurtacı bıldırcın rasyonlarına ketencik (Camelina sativa L.) küspesi ilavesinin performans, yumurta kalite özellikleri ve lipid peroksidasyon üzerine etkisi

Aim: This study was carried out to determine the effects of false flax (Camelina sativa L.) meal supplementation to laying quail diets on performance, egg quality traits, and lipid peroxidation in serum and eggs.Materials and Methods: A total of 240 (160 females and 80 males) eight-week-old Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) divided into one control group and four treatment groups containing 48 quails. Each group was divided into four replicate groups each containing 12 quails. The control group was fed diet containing soybean meal basis without false flax meal (0% FFM). The FFM was used at level of 5% (FFM5), 10% (FFM10), 15% (FFM15), and 20% (FFM20) in treatment diets. The experimental period was lasted for 8 weeks.Results: The results showed that feed intake was lowest in the FFM15 and FFM20 groups (P

PDF

___

Abramovic H, Butinar B, Nikolic V, 2007. Changes occurring in phenolic content, tocopherol composition and oxidative stability of Camelina sativa oil during storage. Food Chem, 104, 903-909.
Anwar F, Naseer R, Bhanger MI, Ashraf S, Talpur FN, Alade- dedune FA, 2008. Physicochemical characteristics of citrus seeds and oils from Pakistan. J Am Oil Chem Soc, 85, 321- 330.
AOAC (Association of Official Analytical Chemists), 2000. Of- ficial Methods of Analysis, 17th edition, AOAC Internatio- nal, Maryland, USA.
Aziza AE, Quezada N, Cherian G, 2010. Feeding Camelina sa- tiva meal to meat-type chickens: Effect on production per- formance and tissue fatty acid composition. J Appl Poult Res, 19, 157-168.
Botsoglou (Olea E, europea Govaris L.) A, Fletouris D, Iliadis S, 2013. Olive lea- ves and α‐tocopheryl acetate as feed anti- oxidants for improving the oxidative stability of α‐linolenic acid‐enriched eggs. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr, 97, 740-753.
Bulbul A, Bulbul T, Biricik H, Yesilbag D, Gezen SS, 2012. Ef- fects of various levels of rosemary and oregano volatile oil mixture on oxidative stress parameters in quails. Afr J Bio- tech, 11, 1800-1805.
Bulbul T, Yesilbag D, Ulutas E, Biricik H, Gezen SS, Bulbul A, 2014. Effect of myrtle (Myrtus communis L.) oil on perfor- mance, egg quality, some biochemical values and hatchabi- lity in laying quails. Revue Med Vet, 165, 280-288.
Card LE, Nesheim MC, 1972. Poultry Production, 11th editi- on, Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia, USA, pp: 274-337.
Cherian G, 2012. Camelina sativa in poultry diets: Opportu- nities and challenges. In: Biofuel Co-products as Livestock FeedOpportunities and Challenges, Ed; Makkar HPS, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO, pp: 303-414.
Cherian G, Campbell A, Parker T, 2009. Egg quality and lipid composition of eggs from hens fed Camelina sativa. J Appl Poult Res, 18, 143-150.
Draper H, Hadley M, 1990. Malondialdehyde determination as index of lipid peroxidation. Methods Enzymol, 186, 421- 30.
Erener G, Burak AK, Ocak N, 2009. A study on feeding hazel- nut kernel oil meal as a protein source for broiler chickens. Anim Sci J, 80, 305-309.
Ferket PR, Gernat AG, 2006. Factors that affect feed intake of meat birds: A review. Int J Poult Sci, 5, 905-911.
Frame DD, Palmer M, Peterson B, 2007. Use of Camelina sati- va in the diets of young turkeys. J Appl Poult Res, 16, 381- 386.
Frame DD, Palmer M, Ward R, Martini S, 2008. Feeding Ca- melina sativa and enhancing omega-3 fatty acid levels in market-age turkey hens. Publ. AG/poultry/2008-01. Utah State Univ Coop Ext, Moab, USA.
Goodwin TW, 1980. Biochemistry of the carotenoids, volume 1: Plants, second edition, Chapman and Hall, New York, USA, pp:1-95.
Haugh R, 1937. The Haugh unit for measuring egg quality. US Egg Poult Magazine, 43: 552-555.
Kakani R, Fowler R, Haq R, Murphy EJ, Rosenberger TA, Ber- how M, Bailey CA, 2012. Camelina meal increases egg n-3 fatty acid content without altering quality or production in laying hens. Lipids, 47, 519-526.
Kanner J, Rosenthall I, 1992. An assessment of lipid oxidation in foods. Pure & Appl Chem, 64, 1959-1964.
Koracevic D, Koracevic G, Djordjevic V, Andrejevic V, Cosic V, 2001. Method for the measurement of antioxidant activity in human fluids. J Clin Pathol, 54, 356-361.
Leeson S, Summers JD, 2001. Nutrition of the chicken. Uni- versity Books, Guelph, Canada.
Matthaus B, 1997. Antinutritive compounds in different oil- seeds. Fett/Lipid, 99, 170-174.
Matthaus B, 2002. Antioxidant activity of extracts obtained from residues of different oilseeds. J Agric Food Chem, 50, 3444-3452.
Matthaus B, Zubr J, 2000. Variability of specific components in Camelina sativa oilseed cakes. Industrial Crops and Pro- ducts, 12, 9-18.
National USA, Poultry, pp: Research 9th 44-46. revised Council, edition, 1994. Natl Nutrient Acad Press, Requirements Washingtonof
Pekel flaxseed ler AY, DB, Patterson Hunter with and JM, PH, without 2009. Hulet supplemental Dietary RM, Acar camelina N, Cravener copper meal for TL, broiler versus Dow- chickens: Live performance and processing yield. Poult Sci88, 2392-2398.
Pilgeram AL, Sands DC, Boss D, Dale N, Wichman D, Lamb PLu C, Barrows R, Kirkpatric M, Thompson B, Johnson DL2007. Camelina sativa, a Montana omega-3 fuel crop. In: Issues in New Crops and New Uses, Eds; Janick J, Whipey AASHA Press, Alexandria, VA, USA, pp: 129-131.
Putnam A promising DH, Budin low-input JT, Field oilseed, LA, Breene In: New WM, Crops, 1993. Eds; Camelina: Janick JSimon JE, Wiley, New York, USA, pp: 314- 322.
Rokka Camelina sory T, quality Alen sativa of K, hen Valaja enriched eggs. J, Ryhanen Food diet on Res the EL, Int, composition 2002. 35, 253-256.
Ryhanen ka K, 2007. EL, Perttila Effect of S, Camelina Tupasela T, sativa Valaja expeller J, Eriksson cake C, on Lark- per- formance and meat quality of broilers. J Sci Food Agric, 871489-1494. Bulbul and Ulutas
Salminen H, Mario E, Riitta K, Marina H, 2006. Inhibition of 223, protein meal461-468. in and cooked lipid pork oxidation meat patties. by rapeseed, Eur Food camelina Res Technol, and soy
Schuster position Crops Prod, A,as Friedt 7, parameters 297302. W, 1998. of Glucosinolate quality of camelina content and seed. com- Ind
Thacker P, Widyaratne G, 2012. Effects of expeller pressed camelina meal and/or canola meal on digestibility, perfor- mance and fatty acid composition of broiler chickens fed wheatsoybean meal-based diets. Arc Anim Nutr, 66, 402- 415.
Van Soest PJ, Robertson JB, Lewis BA, 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and nonstarch poly saccharides 3583-3591. in relation to animal nutrition. J Dairy Sci, 74,
Waraich EA, Ahmed Z, Ahmad Camelina R, Ashraf sativa,MY, Saifullah M, Nae- em Crop hasS, high Sci, Rengel nutritive 7, 1551-1559. Z, 2013. value and Camelina multiple-uses: sativa. a climate A review. proof Aust crop, J
Zubr and J,products. 1997. Oil-seed 6, 113-119. crop: Industrial crops
Zubr J, Matthaus B, 2002. Effects Camelina of growth sativa conditions on fatty acids and tocopherols in oil. Industri- al crops and products, 15, 155-162.