Merkepte regio cruris ve pedis'i çevreleyen kasların yapısal ve fonksiyonel özellikleri

DOI: 10.15312/EuraAmaç: Bu çalışma merkep arka bacağı distal'indeki kaslarınyapısal ve fonksiyonel özelliklerini belirlemek amacıyla ya-pıldı.Gereç ve Yöntem: Materyal olarak 10 merkep kullanıldı.Genel anestezi altında kanları boşaltılan merkeplerin regiocruris ve pedis'ini çevreleyen kasları diseke edildi. Bu sayedekaslardan yapısal ve fonksiyonel parametreler elde edildi.Bulgular: Merkeplerde regio cruris ve pedis'i çevreleyenkaslardan en uzununun m. flexor digitorum lateralis, ve enağırının m. gastrocnemius olduğu belirlendi. Bölgenin engüçlü kası m. flexor digitorum lateralis iken, en güçlü tendo-su m. gastrocnemius'a aitti. Çalışmada bazı kas verilerindecinsiyetler arası istatistiki fark tespit edildi.Öneri: Çalışmada merkeplerin regio cruris ve pedisinde,uzun tendolu, pennate, kısa kas demetli ve küçük hacimlikasların yer aldığı tespit edildi.

Architectural and functional features of muscles surrounding Regio cruris and Pedis in donkey

nJVetSci.201518470Aim: This study was conducted to determine the architectu-ral and functional features of the muscles in distal hindlimbof donkey.Materials and Methods: Totally 10 donkeys were used asmaterial. The muscles, framing regio cruris and pedis of thedonkeys, whose blood was drained under general anesthe-sia, were dissected. Therefore, the architectural and functio- nal parameters were obtained from the muscles.Results: It was determined that m. flexor digitorum latera-lis was the longest and m. gastrocnemius was the heaviestmuscles surrounding regio cruris and pedis in the donkeys.When m. flexor digitorum lateralis was the most powerfulmuscle, m. gastrocnemius was the most powerful tendo inthis region. In this study, statistical difference was detected between the sexes regarding the data of some muscles.Conclusion: In the study, it was determined that long tendo,pennate, short-muscle fibre and small volume placed musc-les were present on the regio cruris and pedis in the donkeys.

PDF

___

Abe T, Brechue WF, Fujita S, Brown JB, 1998. Gender differen- ces in FFM accumulation and architectural characteristics of muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 30, 1066-1070.
Alexander RM, Jayes AS, Maloiy GM, Wathuta EM, 1981. Allo- metry of the leg muscles of mammals. J Zool, 194, 539-552.
Annatte CC, 2010. The anatomy and function of the equine thoracolumbar longissimus dorsi muscle. Doktora Tezi.
Ludwig Maximilians Uni, Düsseldorf, Germany. Biewener AA, 2005. Biomechanical consequences of scaling. J Exp Biol, 208, 1665-1676.
Brown NA, Kawcak CE, McIlwraith CW, Pandy M, 2003a. Arc- hitectural properties of distal forelimb muscles in horses, Equus caballus. J Morph, 258, 106-114.
Brown NA, Pandy MG, Kawcak CE, Mcllwraith CW, 2003b. Force- and moment- generating capacities of muscles in the distal thoracic limb of the horse. J Anat, 203, 101-113.
Bullimore S, Burn J, 2005. Scaling of elastic energy storage in mammalian limb tendons: do small mammals really lose out? Biol Lett, 1, 57-62.
Fayed MH, 2010. (Equus Architecture asinus). and functional specifications of the muscles of the antibrachium and manus regions of the African ass Adv Biol Res, 4 (1): 45-64.
Gunn HM, 1979. Total fibre number in cross sections of the semitendinosus in athletic and non-athletic horses and dogs. J Anat, 128, 821- 828.
Hoshina T, Nitsuma S, Tamate H, 1987. The structure of mus- cule bundles as organized unit in the muscle tissue of the cattles. J Zootechn Sci, 58, 817-826.
International Committee on Veterinary Gross Anatomical Kasların yapısal ve fonksiyonel özellikleri
Nomenclature, 2012. Nomina Anatomica Veterinaria. Pre- face to the 5th edition-revised version, Columbia and Sap- poro, Hannover, Ghent.
Lieber RL, Shoemaker SD, 1992. Muscle, joint, and tendon contributions to the torque profile of frog hip joint. Am J Physiol, 263, 586-590.
Lieber RL, 1992. Skeletal Muscle Anatomy, in: Skeletal Musc- le Structure and Function, Williams and Wilkins, Baltimo- re, UK, pp: 1-43.
Pasi BM, Carrier DR, 2003. Functional trade-offs in the limb muscles of dogs selected for running vs. fighting. J Evol Biol, 16, 324-332.
Payne RC, Crompton RH, Isler K, Savage R, Vereecke EE, Gunt- her MM, Thorpe SKS, Aout KD, 2006. Morphological analy- sis of the hindlimb in apes and humans. II. Moment arms. J Anat, 208, 725-742.
Payne RC, (Equus Hutchinson caballus). JR, Robilliard JJ, Smith NC, Wilson AM, 2005a. Functional specialisation of pelvic limb anatomy in horses J Anat, 206, 557-574.
Payne RC, Veenman P, Wilson AM, 2005b. The role of the ext- rinsic thoracic limb muscles in equine locomotion. J Anat, 206, 193-204.
Demiraslan ve Özcan Pollock CM, Shadwick RE, 1994. Allometry of muscle, ten- don and elastic energy storage capacity in mammals. Am J Physiol, 266, 1022-1031.
Sacks RD, Roy RR, 1992. Architecture of the hindlimb of muscle of cats: functional significance. J Morphol, 173, 185-195.
Smith NC,(Struthio Wilson AM, camelus). Jespers K, Payne RC, 2006. Muscle arc- hitecture and functional anatomy of the pelvic limb of the ostrich J Anat, 209, 765-780.
Spector SA, Gardiner PF, Zernicke RF, Roy RR, Edgerton VR, 1980. Muscle architecture and force-velocity characteris- tics of cat soleus and medial gastrocnemius: implications for motor control. J Neurophysiol, 44, 951-960.
Steudel K, 1990. The work and energetic cost of locomotion. The effects of limb mass distribution in quadrupeds. J Exp Biol, 154, 273-285.
(Equus asinus) Uçar Y, 1980. Yerli merkep'in gövde ve ard ba- cak iskelet kasları üzerinde makro-anatomik araştırmalar. Ank Ün Vet Fak Derg, 27, 103-124.
Williams SB, Payne RC, Wilson AM, 2007. (Lepus Functional europeus). speci- alization of the pelvic limb of the hare J Anat, 210, 472-490.