Tuba Özge YAŞAR, Çetin YAĞCILAR, Mehmet YARDIMCI

Propofol ve karanfil yağının Jack Dempsey balıklarının (Rocio octofasciata) taşınmasında sedatif olarak karşılaştırmalı etkinliği

Amaç: Araştırmanın amacı, balıkların sedasyonuna yönelik en uygun protokolleri belirlemek için, propofol ve karanfil yağının taşıma sırasındaki metabolik etkinliğini azaltmadaki etkinliğini incelemektir. Gereç ve Yöntem: Araştırmada 126 Dempsey balığı kullanıldı. Kontrol (n:42), propofol (n:42) ve karanfil yağı grupları (n:42) litre su başına üç litre oksijenle dolduruldu ve 0.1 ml/L propofol ve karanfil yağı ile takviye edilmiş kapalı plastik torbalara yerleştirildi. Solunum oranları, indüksiyon ve iyileşme süreleri, yem alımı ve renk değiştirme süreleri kaydedildi. Bulgular: Elde edilen bulgular, propofol grubunun solunum hızındaki azalmanın (67.26 ± 6.3, 50.26 ± 9.4, 36.52 ± 4.6, 11.74 ± 4.8, 7.10 ± 3.5, 4.50 ± 2.2, 3.69 ± 1.5) ve iyileşme süresi (dakika başına frekans) (80.12 ± 1.84) kontrol ve karanfil yağı gruplarından istatistiksel olarak farklı (P ˂ 0.05) olduğu ortaya koyuldu. Duyarlılık kontrolleri bakımından, propofol grubunun ışığa, titreşime ve dokunmaya daha az duyarlı olduğu tespit edildi. Öneri: Düşük maliyetli ve kolay bulunabilirliği göz önüne alındığında, propofol, karanfil yağına oranla daha uygun bulundu ve karanfil yağının daha az etkili bir ajan olduğu tespit edildi. Bu nedenle akvaryum balığı taşımacılığında propofolün öncelikli olarak kullanılması önerilebilir.

Comparative efficacy of propofol and clove oil as sedatives in transportation of Jack Dempsey fish (Rocio octofasciata)

Aim: The aim of this research was to examine the efficacies of propofoland clove oil to decrease the metabolic activity during transportationin order to determine optimal protocols for sedation of fish.Materials and Methods: 126 Jack Dempsey fish were used in thisresearch. Control (n:42), propofol (n:42) and clove oil (n:42) groupsplaced into closed clear plastic fish bags filled with three litres ofoxygen per litre of water and supplemented with 0.1 ml/L of propofoland clove oil. Respiratory rates, induction and recovery times,feed intake and color-changing times were measured while reactionsto light, vibration and touch were scored for sensitivity controls.Results: According to the results, the decrease of respiratory ratesper minute (67.26 ± 6.3, 50.26 ± 9.4, 36.52 ± 4.6, 11.74 ± 4.8, 7.10 ±3.5, 4.50 ± 2.2, 3.69 ±1.5) and recovery time respiratory rates (frequencyper minute) of the propofol group (80.12 ± 1.84) differed fromthe control and clove oil groups (p ˂ 0.05). Regarding the sensibilitycontrols, propofol group was less sensible to light, vibration and touch.Conclusion: Considering its low cost and easy availability, sincepropofol has been found to be more suitable and clove oil was moreineffective than propofol, therefore propofol can be recommended asa priority in the transport of aquarium fish.

PDF

___

Adel M., Sadegh AB, Yeganeh S, Movafagh AN, et al., 2016. Anesthetic efficacy of Clove Oil, Propofol, 2-Phenoxyethanol, and Ketamine Hydrochloride on Persian Sturgeon, Acipenser persicus. J World Aquacult Soc, 47 (6), 812-819.
Allen PE, Barquero MD, Bermúdez E, Calderón JC, et al., 2017. Calling for more amlurate information in aquarium trade: analysis of live-fish import permits in Costa Rica. Manag Biol Invasion, 8 (4), 533–542.
Anderson WG, McKinley RS, Colavecchia M, 1997. The use of clove oil as an anesthetic for rainbow trout and its effects on swimming performance. N Am J Fish Manage, 17(2), 301-307.
Belema M, Idowu KO, Aghogho KD, Ndubuisi A, et al., 2017. Handling and packaging of ornamental fishes for successful transportation. Int J Fish Aquat Stud, 5 (5), 263-265.
Cookea SJ, Suskib CD, Ostranda KG, Tuftsb BL, et al., 2004. Behavioral and physiological assessment of low concentrations of clove oil anaesthetic for handling and transporting largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides). Aquaculture, 239 (1-4), 509-529.
Fleming GJ, Heard DJ, Floyd RF, Riggs A, 2003. Evaluation of Propofol and Medetomidine–Ketamine for Short-Term Immobilization of Gulf of Mexico Sturgeon (Acipenser oxyrinchus de Soti). J Zoo Wildl Med, 34 (2), 153–158.
Gholipour KH, Ahadizadeh S, 2013. Use of propofol as an anesthetic and its efficacy on some hematological values of ornamental fish Carassius auratus. SpringerPlus, 2, 76.
Hikasa Y, Takase K, Ogasawara T, Ogasawara, 1986. Anaesthesia and recovery with tricane methanesulphonate, eugenol and thiopental sodium in the carp (Cyprinus carpio). Jpn J Vet Res, 48 (2), 341–351.
Javahery S, Nekoubin H, Moradlu AH, 2012. Effect of anaesthesia with clove oil in fish (review). Fish Physiol Biochem, 38 (6), 1545–1552.
Hoskonen P, Pirhonen J, 2004. The effect of clove oil sedation on oxygen consumption of six temperate-zone fish species. Aquacult Res, 35, 1002-1005.
McFarland WN, 1959. A study of the effects of anaesthetics on the behaviour and physiology of fishes. Publ Inst Mar Sci Univ Tex, 6, 23-55.
Mitchell MA, Riggs SM, Singleton CB, Diaz-Figueroa O, et al., 2009. Evaluating the Clinical and Cardiopulmonary Effects of Clove Oil and Propofol in Tiger Salamanders (Ambystoma tigrinum). J Exot Pet Med, 18 (1), 50-56.
Neiffer DL, Stamper MA, 2009. Fish Sedation, Anesthesia, Analgesia, and Euthanasia: Considerations, Methods, and Types of Drugs. ILAR J, 50 (4), 343-360.
Ross LG, Ross B, 2008. Anaesthetic and Sedative Techniques for Aquatic Animals Transportation and Anaesthesia, Ed; Ross LG, Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, 228 pp.
Sneddon LU, 2012. Clinical anesthesia and analgesia in fish. J Exot Pet Med, 21 (1), 32-43.
Soto CG, Burhanuddin, G, 1995. Clove oil as a fish anaesthetic for measuring length and weight of rabbitfish (Siganus lineatus). Aquaculture, 136 (1-2), 149-152.