The Effect of Teaching Integers through the Problem Posing Approach on Students’ Academic Achievement and Mathematics Attitudes

The Effect of Teaching Integers through the Problem Posing Approach on Students’ Academic Achievement and Mathematics Attitudes

Problem Statement: Throughout history, many changes have occurred in the field of mathematics education. These changes have also occurred concerning special topics that mathematics educators have constantly been searching. The significance of problem posing in mathematics teaching has increased recently with respect to its contributions to the teacher and the student. Thus, the problem posing approach is examined with respect to special topics. Study Purpose: The effect of teaching integers through the problem posing approach on sixth grade students’ academic achievement and mathematics attitudes. Method: Mixed method, in which quantitative and qualitative research methods are used together, was conducted in the study. While the pre-test post-test control group model constituted the quantitative dimension of the study, the observation method and content analysis of students’ work sheets were used for the qualitative dimension. The study groups consisted of a total of 69 participants, 34 of them were in the experimental and 35 of them were in the control group. Findings and Results: According to the findings of the study, there was a difference in favor of the experimental group with respect to the academic achievement levels; and there were no significant differences between two groups with respect to the attitudes towards mathematics. The observations indicated that the problem posing approach created a peaceful competition environment, and increased participation in the classroom. In addition, the student work sheets showed that participants’ problem posing skills progressed, and they became aware of their mistakes. In conclusion, the problem posing approach had a positive effect on the academic achievement in teaching integers, but it did not have a significant effect on student attitudes towards mathematics.

___

  • Abu-Elwan, R. (1999). The development of mathematical problem posing skills for prospective middle school teachers. In A. Rogerson (Ed.), Proceedings of the ınternational conference on mathematical education into 21st Century: Social challenges, ıssues and approaches (pp. 1-8). Cairo: Egypt.
  • Akay, H. (2006). Analysis of the effects of mathematics education carried out through the problem posing approach on the academic achievement, problem solving skills and creativity of students (Doctorate dissertation). Accessed on https://tez.yok.gov.tr
  • Akay, H., & Boz, N. (2009). Prospective teachers’ views about problem-posing activities. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1, 1192-1198.
  • Akay, H., Soybas, D., & Argun, Z. (2006). Problem posing experiences and use of open-ended questions in Mathematics teaching. Kastamonu Education Journal, 14(1), 129-146.
  • Arikan, E. E., & Unal, H. (2013). Examination of primary school year 2. students’ mathematics problem posing skills. Ankara University Faculty of Education Journal, 2(2), 305-325.
  • Aydin Unal, Z., & Ipek, A.S. (2009). The effects of realistic mathematics teaching on primary school year 7 students’ achievements in multiplying with whole numbers. Education and Science, 34(153), 60-70.
  • Baki, A. (2015). Mathematics education from theory to practice. Ankara: Harf Egitim.
  • Bingolbali, E., & Ozmantar, M. F. (2014). Mathematical issues encountered in primary education and solution proposals (4.Edition). Ankara: Pegem Academy.
  • Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects-state, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies İn Mathematics, 22(1), 37-68.
  • Buyukozturk, S. (2014). Data Analysis handbook for social sciences. (2th Edition). Ankara: Pegem.
  • Cankoy, O., & Darbaz, S. (2010). The effect of problem posing based problem solving on the success of understanding the problem. Hacettepe University Faculty of Education Journal, 38, 11-24.
  • Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997-1003.
  • Ellerton, N. F. (1986). Children’s made-up mathematics problem-A new perspective on talented mathematicians. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 17, 261-271.
  • English, L. D. (1997). The development of fifth-grade children’s problem-posing abilities. Educational Studies in Mathematics Education, 34, 183-217.
  • Ercan, B. (2010). Evaluation of primary school year seven students’ knowledge on the concept of whole numbers (Master dissertation). Accessed on https://tez.yok.gov.tr
  • Erktin, E., & Nazlicicek, N. (2002). The Shortened Mathematics Attitude Scale for Primary School Mathematics Teachers. V. National Science and Mathematics Education Congress. Accessed on 07.03.2016 from the website http://old.fedu.metu.edu.tr/ufbmek 5/b_kitabi/PDF/Matematik/Poster/t194.pdf.
  • Ersoy, Y. (2005). Progressive attempts on renovating mathematics education-I: Technology assisted mathematics teaching. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 4(2), 51-63.
  • Fidan, S. (2008). The effects of problem posing activities of primary school year 5. students in Mathematics on problem solving achievements (Master dissertation). Accessed on https://tez.yok.gov.tr
  • Ghasempuor, Z., Bakar, M. N., & Jahanshahloo, G. R. (2013). Innovation in teaching and learning through problem posing tasks and metacognitive strategies. Int. J. Ped. Inn., 1(1), 57-66.
  • Isguden, E. (2008). Difficulties encountered by year 7. and 8. students on the whole numbers subject (Master dissertation). Accessed on https://tez.yok.gov.tr
  • Kar, T., Ozdemir, E., Ipek, A. S., & Abayrak, M. (2010). The relation between the problem posing and problem solving skills of prospective elementary mathematics teachers. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 1577-1583.
  • Karakas Turker, N., & Turanli, N. (2008). Developing an attitude scale concerning mathematics education courses. Gazi Faculty Of Education Journal, 28(3), 17-29.
  • Karasar, N. (2014). Scientific research method (27th Edition). Ankara: Nobel.
  • Karasel, N., Ayda, O., & Tezer, M. (2009, May). Effect of problem posing method in mathematic education with computer assisted pictures on student success and attitudes. Paper presented at 9th International Educational Technology Conference. Ankara-Turkey.
  • Katranci, Y. (2014). The effects of problem posing studies in co-operation based learning settings on mathematical understanding and problem solving achievements (Doctorate dissertation). Accessed on https://tez.yok.gov.tr
  • Kontorovich, I., Koichu, B., Leikin, R., & Berman, A. (2012). An exploratory framework for handling the complexity of mathematical problem posing in small groups. The Journal Of Mathematical Behavior, 31, 149-161.
  • Koroglu, H., & Yesildere, S. (2004). The effects of teaching primary school year seven mathematics course whole numbers unit through multiple intelligence based teaching on student success. Gazi Faculty Of Education Journal, 24(2), 25-41.
  • Korukcu, E. (2008). The effects of teaching the whole numbers subject through visual materials on year 6. students’ mathematics success (Doctorate dissertation). Accessed on https://tez.yok.gov.tr
  • Lavy, I., & Shiriki, A. (2010).Engaging in problem posing activities in a dynamic geometry setting and the development of prospective teachers’ mathematical knowledge. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 29, 11-24.
  • Lowrie, T. (1999). Free problem-posing: Year 3/4 students constructing problems for friends to solve. MERGA, 22, 328-335.
  • Lowrie, T. (2002). Designing a framework for problem posing young children generating open-ended tasks. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 3(3), 354-364.
  • MoNE (Ministry of National Education) (2013). Secondary School Mathematics Course (Year 5, 6, 7 and 8) Curriculum. Ankara: MEB.
  • Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40, 120-123.
  • NCTM (2000). Principals and standards for school Mathematics. Reston, Va: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Pub.
  • OECD. (2006). International student assessment (PISA). Accessed on 20 December 2015 on the website https://data.oecd.org/pisa/mathematics-performance-pisa.htm.
  • OECD. (2009). International student assessment (PISA). Accessed on 20 December 2015 on the website https://data.oecd.org/pisa/mathematics-performance-pisa.htm.
  • OECD. (2012). International student assessment (PISA). Accessed on 20 December 2015 on the website https://data.oecd.org/pisa/mathematics-performance-pisa.htm.
  • Polya, G. (1957). How to solve it. A new aspect of mathematical method. Princeton, NJ: Princeton.
  • Silver, E. A. (1994). On mathematical problem posing. For the Learning of Mathematics, 14(1), 19–28.
  • Silver, E. A., & Cai , J .(1996). An analysis of arithmetic problem posing by middle school students. Journal for Research in Mathematical Research,27(5), 521–539.
  • Sahin, A., Ongoren, H., & Cokadar, H. (2010). The effects of multiple intelligence theory based teaching on student attitudes towards science. e-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 5(2), 432-445.
  • Tavsancil, E., & Aslan, E. (2001). Content analysis and examples of implementation. Istanbul: Epsilon. Tekin, H. (1996). Assessment and evaluation in education. Ankara: Yargı.
  • Toluk Ucar, Z. (2009). Developing pre-service teachers understanding of fractions through problem posing. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 166–175.
  • Turgut, U., & Gurbuz, F. (2011). Effects of teaching with 5E model on students’ attitudes and conceptual changes about the subject of heat and temperature. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 3(2), 679-706.
  • Turhan, B., & Guven, M. (2014). The effects of teaching mathematics through the problem posing approach on problem solving achievement, problem solving skills and mathematics opinions. Cukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 43(2), 217-234.
  • Unlu, M., & Sarpkaya Aktas, G. (2017). Examination of pre-service elementary mathematics teachers’ problems posed about algebraic expressions and equations. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education, 8(1), 161-187.
  • Ustuner, M. (2006). Reliability and validity study concerning the teaching profession attitudes scale. Educational Management in Theory and Practice, 45, 109-127.
  • Varol, F., & Kubanc, Y. (2012). Common arithmetical difficulties that students face on story problems. Turkish Studies-International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic, 7(1), 2067-2074.
  • Yenilmez, K., & Bagdat, O. (2014). Learning difficulties of year seven students on whole numbers problems. Abstracts of International EJER Congress 1st Eurasian Educational Research Congress, 24 – 26 April.
  • Yildirim, A., & Simsek, H. (2013). Qualitative research methods in social sciences (9. Edition). Ankara: Seckin.