Teachers' attitudes toward using activities while teaching English to young learners

Problem Durumu: İngilizcenin uluslararası dil olarak kabul görmesi okullarda İngilizce öğretme yaşının ana sınıflarına kadar inmesine yol açmıştır. İngiliz Dili Eğitimi konusunda 20. yüzyılın ikinci yarısında yaygın olan en iyi öğretim yöntemini bulma çabaları tek bir yöntemin farklı yöreler ve yaş grupları için uygun olamayacağı yönündeki anlayışın kabul görmesiyle sonuçlanmıştır. Bu da öğretmenlerin belirli bilgi ve becerilere sahip olması gerekliliğini ortaya çıkarmıştır. Farklı aktivite dağarcığına sahip olma ve yeri gelince kullanabilme de bu bağlamda önem kazanmıştır. Ancak Kuzey Kıbrıs’ta öğretmenlerin yol gösteren bir yöntem çatısı olmadan farklı aktiviteler kullanmaya karşı tutumlarının ne olduğu konusunda hiçbir araştırmaya rastlanmamıştır.

Okulöncesi ve ilkokul birinci ve ikinci sınıf öğretmenlerinin İngiliz dili eğitiminde kullanılan aktivitelere ilişkin tutumları

Problem statement: Since the beginning of the new millennium, the English language has become the dominant international language. Consequently, the need to learn English has increased and teaching English to young learners has become a worldwide practice. The way children learn a second or foreign language differs from the adult approach toward learning. Children gain literacy in the traditional sense and have a shorter concentration span than adults. They are active and consider learning a kind of play. Recognition of these differences led to the proliferation of materials developed for young English learners. Accordingly, activities used when teaching English to young learners expanded in variety. In North Cyprus, teaching English as a foreign language begins as early as preschool. This has been in practice since 2005. However, there is a dearth of research into teachers’ attitudes toward using different activities and which activities are favored most in teaching English to young learners in North Cyprus. Purpose of the study: This study explores the attitudes of teachers toward using different activities while teaching English to young learners in pre-school and years one and two in primary schools in North Cyprus in the 2006-2007 academic year. It also seeks to find out whether there are differences in the attitudes of preschool and primary school English teachers toward the variety of activities collected through observing teachers. Cluster sampling was used and 110 preschool and primary school English teachers participated in the study. Data was collected through an in-house questionnaire designed according to the five-point Likert scale. Findings and Results: Data suggests that both pre-school and primary school teachers are in favor of using different activities while teaching English to young learners. Teachers demonstrated a positive attitude toward using different activities. The results of the independent samples t-test suggest that there is no significant difference between the responses of pre-school and primary school teachers. The only significant difference is found in whether English should be taught through using language in games. A bivariate analysis indicated a very strong relationship between responses given to the use of different activities. Conclusions and Recommendations: Pre-school and primary school teachers teaching English in North Cyprus have a positive attitude toward using a variety of activities. The ages of these learners are close to each other and their development is similar. Therefore, the results of the study are parallel to this fact and teachers’ attitudes toward different activities do show great similarities. In the future, if research is conducted on similar issues, it is recommended that gender, previous training, and length of experience of teachers should be taken into consideration.

___

  • Balcı, A. (2004). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma: Yöntem, teknik ve ilkeler. Ankara: PegemA.
  • Beyazkürk D., Anlıak, Ş., Dinçer, Ç. (2007). Peer relations and friendship in childhood. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 26,13-26.
  • Brewster, J., Ellis, G., Girard, D. (2002). The primary english teacher’s guide. Penguin English Guides.
  • Brumfit, C., Moon, J., Tongue, R. (1994). Teaching english to children. London: Longman.
  • Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching english to young learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Cameron, L. (2003). Challenges for ELT from the expansion in teaching children. ELTJ. 57(2):105-112.
  • Crystal, D. (2003). English as a global language. London: Longman.
  • Ellis, R. (1985). Understanding second language acquisition. Oxford: OUP.
  • Frisby, A. W. (1963). The new ship english course. London:Longman.
  • Hair, J.F. Jr, Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, 5th ed., Prentice-Hall.
  • Hemming, J. Gatenby, E. V. (1958). Absorbing english. London: Longmans, Green and Co. Ltd.
  • Herrera, M., Zanatta, T. (2000). New english parade. London: Pearson Education.
  • Ioannou, A., Papadopoulos, A. S. (1968). English now. London: Longman, Green and Company.
  • Krashen, S. (1981). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. London: Prentice-Hall International (UK) Ltd.
  • Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: issues and implications. London: Longman.
  • Krashen, S. (1988). Second language acquisition and second language learning. London: Prentice-Hall International.
  • Kumaravadivelu, B. (1994). The Post-method condition: (e)merging strategies for second/foreign language teaching. TESOL Quarterly. 25(2):315-349.
  • Larsen Freeman, D. (1986). Techniques and principles in language teaching. New York: OUP.
  • Lee, W. R. (1971). The dolphin english course. London: Oxford University Press.
  • Madymufiol, M., Villaroel, M. (2005). English adventure. London: Longman.
  • McLuhan, M. (1964). Understanding media: the extensions of man. USA: Gingko Press.
  • McIlvan, A (1999). English adventure. Retreived February 21, 2009 from www.englishadventure. net
  • Moon, J., Nikolov, M. (ed). (2000). Researching into teaching english to young learners. Hungary: University Press Pecs.
  • Nunan, D. (1991). Language teaching methodology. Hertfordshire: Prentice Hall International.
  • Nunan, D. (2002). The impact of english as a global language: policy and planning in greater china. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 7(1):1-5.
  • Nunan, D. (2003). The impact of english as a global language on educational policies and practices in asia-pacific region. TESOL Quarterly. 37(4):589-613.
  • Özad, B. E. (1997). The reflective model of teacher training: its influence on the novice english language teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Manchester.
  • Read, C. (2003). ‘Is younger better?’. English Teaching Professional. Modern English Publishing, Issue 28.
  • Richards, J. C. R., Rodgers, T. (1986). Approaches and methods in language teaching: a description and analysis. Sydney, Cambridge: CUP.
  • Rixon. S. (1992). English and other languages for younger children: practice and theory in a rapidly changing world. Language Teaching. 25(2): 73-93.
  • Rodgers, T. (1990). After methods what? Language teaching methodology for the 1990’s. Sarinee Anvian (ed). Anthology Series 24. Seam Reginal Centre, 1-21.
  • Sahin, A. E. (2004). Öğretmenlerin yeterliliklerinin belirlenmesi [Determination of Teacher Effectiveness] Bilim ve Aklın Aydınlığında Eğitim Dergisi, Sayı 58.
  • Sahin, A. E. (2008). A qualitative assessment of the quality of Turkish elementary schools. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research. 30:117-139.
  • Strange, D. (1989) Chatterbox. London:OUP.
  • Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Vanderplank, R. (2008). The significance of first language development in five to nine year old children for second and foreign language learning. Applied Linguistics. 29(4):717-722.