Class Teacher Candidates' Skill of Saying No in Relation to Components of Moral Anatomy1

Class Teacher Candidates' Skill of Saying No in Relation to Components of Moral Anatomy1

Problem Statement: The ability to say no when faced with demands with possible moral consequences becomes a problem that must be addressed in terms of morality in all of its dimensions, including in terms of the concept of character. Character can be defined from different perspectives, and within the framework of moral anatomy. For class teacher candidates, an additional consideration is that they will be professionally required to bemodelsofcharactertostudentsincriticalperiodsofcharacterdevelopment, as well as to promote the skill of saying no among students. In that regard, class teacher candidates’ skills of saying no when faced with moral dilemmas that they experience in their professional lives are essential to investigate, particularly in relation to the components of moral anatomy. Purpose of the Study: The purpose of the study was to investigate class teacher candidates’ skill of saying no in relation to components of moral anatomy.Method: Followingaphenomenologicaldesign,thisstudy’ssampleincluded 25 volunteer class teacher candidates who have experienced the phenomenon of saying no in an education faculty in Turkey. Research data were collected via semi structured interviews conducted with case study texts containing moral dilemmas related to the ability of saying no. Data obtained in line with the case studies were analyzed according to thematic analysis. Findings: Class teacher candidates can generally say no when it comes to personal interests. The demand that they accept most concerns changing roles, and the only dilemmas that they fail to resolve are moral ones related to close relationships. A basic result of this study is that class teacher candidates think that they might have more difficulty with saying no in terms of having to change roles. Participants said that they would not have any difficulty with saying no due to their ideology, even when concerning their personal interests. It might be suggested that the most basic factor affecting class teacher candidates’ reactions to saying no when faced with moral dilemmas, at least within the scope of this study, is moral anatomy—that is, the person’s character structure. ConclusionandRecommendations: Resultssuggest that classteachercandidates need to distinguish evaluations of their morality according to moral anatomy characteristics that they possess and the codes of ethics of the teaching professio

___

  • Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., Lim, V. K., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a socialcognitive model of moral behavior: The interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123- 141.
  • Aslan, D., & Ozcebe, H. (2008). Egitim kurumlarinda sigarasizlik politikalari [Nonsmoking policies in educational institutions]. Ankara: Klasmat Matbaacilik.
  • Berkowitz, M. W. (2002). The science of character education. In W. Damon (Ed.). Bringing in a new era in character education (pp. 43-63). Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.
  • Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2004). Research-based character education. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 591, 72-85.
  • Berkowitz, M. W., & Bier, M. C. (2005). What works in character education: A researchdriven guide for educators. Washington: John E. & Frances G. Pepper.
  • Berkowitz, M. W., & Grych, J. H. (1998). Fostering goodness: Teaching parents to facilitate children’s moral development. Journal of Moral Education, 27, 371-391.
  • Braun, V. ve Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
  • Cevizci, A. (2014). Etik: Ahlak felsefesi. [Ethics: Moral philosophy]. Istanbul: Say Yayinlari.
  • Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., Turan, N., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2013). Agreement and similarity in self-other perceptions of moral character. Journal of Research in Personality, 47(6), 816-830.
  • Cohen, T. R., Panter, A. T., Turan, N., Morse, L., & Kim, Y. (2014). Moral character in workplace. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(5), 943-963.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry & resaerch design: Choosing among five approaches (Third edition). New York: Sage.
  • Davidson, M., Lickona, T., & Khmelkov, V. (2008). Smart & good schools: A new paradigm for high schools character education. In L. P. Nucci, & D. Narvaez (Eds.). Handbook of moral and character education (pp. 370-390). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Derry, R. (1989). An empirical study of moral reasoning among managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 855-862.
  • Elm, D. R., & Nichols, M. L. (1993). An investigation of the moral reasoning of managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 817-833.
  • Forsyth, D. R. (1992). Judging the morality of business practices: The Influence of Personal Moral Philosophies. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 461-470.
  • Forsyth, D. R., & Berger, R. E. (1982). The effects of ethical ideology on moral behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, (117), 53-56.
  • Haidt, J. (2003). The moral emotions. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.). Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 852-870). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Halstead, J. M., & Taylor, M. J. (1996). Values in education and education in values. London: The Falmer Press.
  • Hardy, S. A. (2006). Identity, reasoning, and emotion: An empirical comparison of three sources of moral motivation. Retrieved from http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11031-006-9034-9/fulltext.html
  • Hardy, S. A., Walker, L. J., Olsen, J. A., Woodbury, R. D., & Hickman, J. R. (2013). Moral identity as moral ideal self: Links to adolescent outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 1-13.
  • Husserl, E. (2012). Ideas: General introduction to pure phenomenology. Routledge.
  • Karatay, H. (2011). Transfer of values in the Turkish and Western children’s literary works: Character education in Turkey. Educational Research and Reviews, 6(6), 472-480.
  • Kemp, J. (2006). Hayir: Basit bir cumle hayatinizi ne kadar degistirir? [No : How one simple sentence can transform your life] H. Guner (Trans.). Istanbul: GOA Basim Yayin ve Tanitim Hiz. San. Tic. Ltd. Sti.
  • Kocabiyik, O. O., & Kulaksizoglu, A. (2014). A qualitative survey examining moral identities of young adults. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 14, 835-858.
  • Lapsley, D. K., & Narvaez, D. (2004). A social-cognitive approach to moral personality. In D. K. Lapsley, & D. Narvaez (Eds.). Moral development, self and identity (pp. 189-213). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  • Malti, T., & Krettenauer, T. (2013). The relationship of moral emotion attributions to prosocial and antisocial behavior: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 84(2), 397-412.
  • McAdams, D. P. (2009). The moral personality. In D. Narvaez, & D. K. Lapsley (Eds.). Personality, identity, and character: Explorations in moral psychology (pp. 11-29). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: Methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage.
  • O'Sullivan, S. (2004). Books to live by: Using children's literature for character education. The Reading Teacher, 57(7), 640-645.
  • Selcuk, Z. (2012). Egitim psikolojisi [Educational psychology]. Ankara: Nobel Yayin Dagitim
  • Shao, R., Aquino, K., & Freeman, D. (2008). Beyond moral reasoning: A review of moral identity research and its implications for business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18(4), 513-540.
  • Smith, M. J. (1998). “Hayir” dedigimde kendimi suclu hissediyorum II [When I say no, I feel guilty II] H. Kosar (Trans..). Istanbul: Kuraldisi Yayincilik.
  • Spiecker, B., & Steutel, J. (1996). Moral identity and education in a multicultural society. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 15(1), 159-165.
  • Van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Walnut Cree, CA: Left Coast Press, Inc.
  • Winterich, K. P., Aquino, K., Mittal, V., & Swartz, R. (2013). When moral identity symbolization motivates prosocial behavior: The role of recognition and moral identity internalization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 98(5), 759-770.
  • Winterich, K. P., Mittal, V., & Aquino, K. (2013). When does recognition increase charitable behavior? Towards a moral identity-based model. Journal of Marketing, 77(3), 121-134.
  • Yetkin, D., & Dascan, O. (2010). Son degisikliklerle ilkogretim programi 1-5. siniflar [Elementary education program with recent changes 1-5]. Ankara: Ani Yayincilik.