An Alternative Method to Resolve the Classroom Problems: Mock Trial

Purpose: Mock trial is an activity commonly used both in and out of the class in citizenship education. Mock trial is a simulation technique rooted in experiential learning. This study aimed to evaluate the Mock trial method used by a primary school teacher in Turkey to solve the problems faced during lessons. Research Methods: This research is designed as an intrinsic case study, which involves the use of Mock trials to solve the classroom problems. Participants were a classroom teacher and 20 fourth grade students attending her class. Research data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Findings: Mock trial procedure was conducted during the last 15 minutes of the lessons at one-to-two-month intervals. The problem to be handled in the Mock trial is decided by the consensus of the students and the teacher. Students solve the problem by acting out their roles as decided in the trial. In this way, students develop the skills of problem solving, self-control, responsibility, empathy, and communication. Also, they learn about the concepts of right and justice, and the functioning of justice system. Implications for Research and Practice: When Mock trial is to be applied to solve classroom problems, especially the problems students commonly experience in their school can be prioritized. Rules to abide before, during and after the trial should be set up first, and a democratic classroom culture characterized with respect, affection and confidence should be established. Students should be encouraged to concentrate on the solution of the classroom problems. Further research can be conducted on utilizing this method as an instructional method in different courses. Moreover, training programs can be held to inform the teachers about this method.

PDF

___

Ahmadov, A. (2011). When great minds don't think alike: using mock trials in teaching political thought. Political Science & Politics, 44(3), 625-628.
Ambrosio, T. (2006). Trying Saddam Hussein: Teaching international law through an undergraduate mock trial. International Studies Perspectives, 7(2), 159–171.
Arthur, J., & Wright, D. (2001). Teaching citizenship in the secondary school. London: David Fulton.
Asal, V., & Blake, E. L. (2006). Creating simulations for political science education. Journal of Political Science Education, 2, 1–18.
Bradley P. (2006). The history of simulation in medical education and possible future directions. Medical Education, 40(3), 254 –262,
Beck, J. A., & Czerniak C. M (2005). Invasion zebra of the mussels: A mock trial activity. Science Activities, Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 42(1), 15-19.
Bengtson, T. J., & Sifferd, K. L. (2010). The unique challenges posed by mock trial: Evaluation and assessment of a simulation course, Journal of Political Science Education, 6(1), 70-86.
Carlson, J. L., & Skaggs, N. T. (2000). Learning by trial and error: A case for moot courts. The Journal of Economic Education, 31(2), 145-155.
Cassidy, W., & Yates. R. (1998). Let’s talk about LAW in elementary school. Calgary, AB: Detselig Enterprises Ltd.
Ersoy, A. F. (2007). Sosyal bilgiler dersinde ogretmenlerin etkili vatandaşlık eğitimi uygulamalarina ilişkin gorusleri [The opinions of teacher regarding the practices of effective citizenship education in social studies course). Eskisehir: Anadolu Universitesi Yayinlari.
Fliter, J. (2009). Incorporating a sophisticated supreme court simulation into an undergraduate constitutional law class. Journal of Political Science Education, 5(1), 12-26
Glancy, G. D. (2016). The mock trial: Revisiting a valuable training strategy. The Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law, 44, 19–27.
Glesne, C. (2012). Nitel araştırmaya giriş [Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction]. A. Ersoy & P. Yalçinoglu, (Trans. Eds.). Ankara: Ani Yayıncilik.
Helgeson, L. J., Hoover, J., & Sheehan, J. (2002). Introducing preservice teachers to issues surrounding evolution and creationism via a mock trial. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 14(2), 11-24.
Hersch, J., & Viscusi, W. K. (1998). The courtroom comes to the classroom: Estimating economic damages as an instructional device. The Journal of Economic Education, 29(4), 301-311.
Jefferson, K. W. (1999). The Bosnian war crimes trial simulation: Teaching students about the fuzziness of world politics and international law. Political Science and Politics, 32, 589–92.
Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kravetz, K. (2001. The mock trial course in justice education. Journal of Criminal Justice Education, 12(1), 47-68
Knerr, C. R., & Sommerman. A. B. (2001). Bringing the court into the undergraduate classroom: Appellate simulation in American College. Laws and Courts, 11, 4–8.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985).Naturalistic inquiry (Vol. 75). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. Jossey-Bass.
Mills, A. J., Durepos, G., & Wiebe, E. (Eds.). (2010). Encyclopedia of case study research: A-z; index (Vol. 1-2). California: Sage.
Patrick, J. J. (1991). Teaching the bill of rights in secondary schools: Four keys to an improved civic education. The Social Studies, 82(6), 227-231.
Ringel, L. S. (2004). Designing a moot court: What to do, what not to do, and suggestions for how to do it. Political Science and Politics, 37(3), 459-465.
Smagorinsky, P. (1994). Bring the courtroom to the classroom: Develop civic awareness with simulation activities. Social Studies, 85(4),174-180.
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Strickland, K. (2016). The need for civics education in our schools. How FBA Members in Ohio are Leading the Way and Volunteering with the Ohio Center for Law-Related Education.
Smith, R. (1992). Using a mock trial to make a difficult clinical decision. British Medical Journal, 305(6864): 1284–1287.
Weiner, M. S. (2010). Teachable trials in the social studies classroom. Social Education, 74(3), 122–125.
Wheeler, L. B., Maeng J. L., & Smetana L. K. (2014). Incorporating argumentation through forensic science, science activities. Classroom Projects and Curriculum Ideas, 51(3), 67-77.