___

• Adey, P., G. Hewitt, J. Hewitt, & N. Landau. (2004). The professional development of teachers: Practice and theory. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Allison, D. & Carey, J. (2007). What do university language teachers say about language teaching research? TESL Canada Journal, 24(2), 61-81.
• Anderson, G. (1990). Fundamentals of educational research. New York, NY: Falmer.
• Anderson, J. (2003). Expanding the paradigm: Students as researchers in service-learning. In S. H. Billig & A. S. Waterman (Eds.), Studying service learning: Innovations in education research methodology (pp.167–184). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Anderson, S. E. (Ed.). (2002). Improving schools through teacher development. Case studies of the Aga Khan foundation projects in East Africa. Lisse, Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.
• Barkhuizen, G. (2009). Topics, aims, and constraints in English teacher research: A Chinese case study. TESOL Quarterly, 43, 113-125. http://doi.org/bcqh
• Berdie, D. R., Anderson, J. F., & Niebuhr, M. A. (1986). Questionnaires: Design and use. London, UK: The Scarecrow Press.
• Bernhardt, V. L. (2013). The school portfolio. A comprehensive framework for school improvement (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Eye On Education.
• Borg, S. (2009). English language teachers’ conceptions of research. Applied Linguistics, 30(3), 358-388. http://doi.org/d9cvzt
• Borg, S. & Liu, Y. (2013). Chinese college English teachers’ research engagement. TESOL Quarterly, 47, 270-299. http://doi.org/bcqj
• Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Promoting reflection in learning: A model. In D. Boud, R. Keogh, & D. Walker. (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp.18–40). New York, NY: Nichols.
• Bullough, R. V., & Gitlin, A. D. (2001). Becoming a student of teaching: Linking knowledge production and practice. New York, NY: RoutledgeFalmer.
• Burns, A. (2009). Doing action research in ELT. A guide for practitioners. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Calfee, R., & Perfumo, P. (Eds.). (1996). Writing portfolios in the classroom. Policy and practice, promise and peril. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Castle, K. (2012). Early childhood teacher research. From questions to results. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Çelik, S. & Dikilitaş, K. (2015). Action research as a professional development strategy. In S. Borg and H. S. Sanchez (Eds.), International perspectives on teacher research (pp. 125-138). Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• Churchill, R., Ferguson, P., Godinho, S., Johnson, N. F., Keddie, A., Letts, W., Mackay, J., McGill, M., Moss, J., Nagel, M. C., Nicholson, P., & Vick, M. (2011). Teaching: Making a difference. Milton, Australia: Wiley and Sons.
• Cirocki, A. (2013a). Conducting research in the EFL classroom. Modern English Teacher, 22(1), 76-81.
• Cirocki, A. (2013b). Conducting research in the classroom: Collecting qualitative and quantitative data. Modern English Teacher, 22(2), 63-69.
• Cirocki, A., Tennekoon, S., & Peña Calvo, A. (2014). Research and reflective practice in the ESL classroom: Voices from Sri Lanka. The Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 39(4), 24-44. http://doi.org/bcqk
• Cottrell, R. R., & McKenzie, J. F. (2011). Health promotion and education research methods: Using the five chapter thesis/dissertation model. Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
• Coyle, D., Hood, P., & Marsh, D. (2010). Content and language integrated learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Creswell, J., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. London, UK: Sage.
• Denny, H. G. (2006). Can busy classroom teachers really do action research? An action research study in an EAL tertiary setting. New Zealand Studies in Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 59-73.
• Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
• Farrell, T. S. C. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London, UK: Continuum.
• Farrell, T. S. C. (2015). Promoting teacher reflection in second language education. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Fayolle, A. (Ed.). (2010). Handbook of research in entrepreneurship education, volume 3, international perspectives. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
• Fichtman Dana, N., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2009). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research. Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Gao, X. & Chow, A. W. K. (2012). Primary school English teachers’ research engagement. ELT Journal, 66(2), 224-232. http://doi.org/dbm449
• Gardner, F. (2014). Being critically reflective: Engaging in holistic practice. Basingstoke, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
• General Teaching Council for Wales. (2002). Continuing professional development: An entitlement for all. Retrieved from
• http://www.gtcw.org.uk/gtcw/images/stories/downloads/cpd/CPD_AdviceE.pdf
• Gregory, I. (2003). Ethics in research. London, UK: Continuum.
• Hopkins, D. (2008). A teacher’s guide to classroom research. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
• Johnson, K. E. (2009). Second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Johnson, K. E., & Golombek, P. (2011). A sociocultural theoretical perspective on teacher professional development. In K. E. Johnson & P. R. Golombek (Eds.), Research on second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on professional development (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Khachatryan, S., Petrosyan, S., & Terzyan, G. (2013). Assessment of teacher professional development and educational content in the context of general education reforms in Armenia. Retrieved from
• http://www.osf.am/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/FinalENGAssessmentPDEC.pdf
• Kemmis, S. (1985). Action research and the politics of reflection. In D. Boyd, D. Keogh & D. Walber (Eds.), Reflection: Turning experience into learning (pp.139–164). London, UK: Kogan Page.
• Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (1988). The action research reader (3rd ed.). Geelong, Australia: Deakin University Press.
• Keyes, C. (2000). The early childhood teacher’s voice in the research community. International Journal of Early Years Education, 8(1), 3–13. http://doi.org/fjzkzs
• Killion, J., & Todnem, G. (1991). A process for personal theory building. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 14–16.
• Kim, E. (2011). Ten years of CLT curricular reform efforts in South Korea: An activity theory analysis of a teacher’s experience. In K. E. Johnson & P. R. Golombek (Eds.), Research on second language teacher education: A sociocultural perspective on professional development (pp. 225-238). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Kincheloe, J. L. (2003). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London, UK: FalmerPress.
• Klassen, A. C., Creswell, J., Plano Clark, V. L., Clegg Smith, K., & Meissner, H. I. (2012). Best practices in mixed-methods for quality of life research. Qual Life Res, 21, 377–380. http://doi.org/bcqm
• Lieberman, A., & Grolnick, M. (1996). Networks and reform in American Education. Teachers College Record, 98(1), 7–45.
• Lyons, N. (2010). Handbook of reflection and reflective inquiry: Mapping a way of knowing for professional reflective inquiry. New York, NY: Springer.
• Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Mertler, C. A. (2012). Action research. Improving schools and empowering educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Mezirow, J. (1990). Fostering critical reflection in adulthood: A guide to transformative and emancipatory learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Mistretta, R. M. (2008). Teachers engaging parents and children in mathematical learning: Nurturing productive collaboration. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Education.
• Norton, L. S. (2009). Action research in teaching and learning. A practical guide to conducting pedagogical research in universities. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Nunan, D. (2004). Task-based language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• O’Donnell, A. M., Reeve, J., & Smith, J. K. (2012). Educational psychology. Reflection for action. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• Pappas C. C., & Raymond, E. T. (2011). Becoming a teacher researcher in literacy teaching and learning strategies and tools for the inquiry process. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Pisapia, J. R. (2009). The strategic leader. New tactics for a globalizing world. Charlotte, NC: IAP-Information Age Publishing.
• Pollard, A., Collins, J., Maddock, M., Simco, N., Swaffield, S., Warin, J., & Warwick, P. (2005). Reflective teaching (2nd ed). London, UK: Continuum.
• Richards, J. C., & Rodgers, T. S. (2001). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Rust, F. O. (2007). Action research in early childhood contexts. In J. A. Hatch (Ed.), Early childhood qualitative research (pp. 95–108). New York, NY: Routledge.
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
• Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organisation. New York, NY: Doubleday.
• Shulman, L. S. (1988). The dangers of dichotomous thinking in education. In P. P. Grimmett & G. L. Erickson (Eds.), Reflection in teacher education (pp. 31–46). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
• Smith, R., Connelly, T., & Rebolledo, P. (2014). Teacher research as continuing professional development: A project with Chilean secondary schools. In D. Hayes (Ed.), Innovations in the continuing professional development of English language teachers (pp. 111-128). London: The British Council.
• Spada, N. (2007). Communicative language teaching: Current status and future prospects. In J. Cummins & C. Davidson (Eds.), International handbook of English language teaching (pp. 271–288). New York, NY: Springer.
• Stahmer, A. C., Suhrheinrich, J., Reed, S., Schreibman, L., & C. Bolduc. (2011). Classroom pivotal response teaching for children with autism. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
• Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London, UK: Heinemann.
• Tadevosyan, A. (2008). The parallel worlds of NGOs, multilateral aid, and development banks: The case of community schools in Armenia. In I. Silova & G. Steiner-Khamsi (Eds.), How NGOs react: Globalization and education reform in the Caucasus, Central Asia and Mongolia (pp. 81–101). Bloomfield, CT: Kumarian Press.
• Terzian, S. M. (2010). Curriculum reform in post-Soviet Armenia: Balancing local and global contexts in Armenian secondary schools. Retrieved from
• http://ecommons.luc.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1106&context=luc_diss
• Weathington, B., Cunningham, C., & Pittenger, D. (2010). Research methods for the behavioral and social sciences. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
• Winslow, E. H. (1996). Failure to publish research: A form of scientific misconduct. Heart and Lung: The Journal of Acute and Critical Care, 25, 169–171. http://doi.org/c9n2bt
• Zeichner, K. (2003). Teacher research as professional development P-12 educators in the USA. Educational Action Research, 11(2), 301–328. http://doi.org/fchx66