Real-Time PCR Tekniği ile Çeşitli Et Ürünlerinde Tavuk ve Sığır Eti Oranlarının Kantitatif Tyini
Et ürünleri üretiminde kullanılan et türlerinin tür bazında ve oransal olarak doğru belirlenmesi tüketicinin aldatılmasının
önlenmesi, halk sağlığının korunması ve üreticiler arası haksız rekabetin önlenmesi açısından büyük önem
taşımaktadır.Yapılan bu çalışmada, hem tür analizi hem de kantitatif analiz yapabildiği üretici firma tarafından ifade
edilen SureFood Animal QUANT Beef ve SureFood Animal QUANT Chicken real- time PCR kitleri kullanılmştır.
Çalışmada deneysel olarak belirli oranlarda (%10 sığır eti + %90 tavuk eti, %20 sığır eti + %80 tavuk eti, %30 sığır eti +
%70 tavuk eti, %50 sığır eti + %50 tavuk eti, %20 tavuk eti + %80 sığır eti, %30 tavuk eti + %70 sığır eti olmak üzere)
sığır eti + tavuk eti karışımlarının yanı sıra farklı oranlarda sığır ve tavuk etinden hazırlanmış et ürünleri (salam, sosis ve
sucuk) test materyali olarak kullanılmıştır. Et karışımlarından ve et ürünlerinden DNA ekstraksiyon işlemleri SureFood
Prep Animal DNA ekstraksiyon kiti (Congen S 1003, Berlin, Almanya) ile yapılmıştır. DNA ekstraksiyonunu takiben
Real-Time PCR tekniği ile et oranları tayin edilmeye çalışılmıştır. PCR analizleri Light Cycler-2 (Roche) cihazında gerçekleştirilmiştir.
Çalışma sonuçlarına göre, kullanılan SureFood Animal QUANT Beef and SureFood Animal QUANT
Chicken real-time PCR kitlerinin deneysel olarak farklı oranlarda sığır ve tavuk etinden hazırlanmış et karışımları ile
yine çeşitli sığır ve tavuk eti karışımlarından yapılan salam, sosis ve sucuk örneklerinde sığır ve tavuk eti oranlarını
kantitatif olarak doğru tespit edemediği ortaya konulmuştur.
Quantitative Detection of Chicken and Beef Meat From Meat Products by Real-Time PCR
Quantitative detection of meat species that are used in production of meat products has a great importance
for preventing consumers from adulteration, protection of public health and prevention of unfair competition between
producers. In this study, SureFood Animal QUANT Beef and SureFood Animal QUANT Chicken real-time PCR kits
were used to detect meat species quantitatively. For this purpose, various proportions (10% bovine + 90% chicken, 20%
bovine + 80% chicken, 30% bovine + 70% chicken, 50% bovine + 50% chicken, 80% bovine + 20% chicken, 70% bovine
+ 30% chicken) of bovine and chicken meat mixtures and meat products (salami, sausage and sucuk from different
bovine + chicken meat) were experimentally prepared. After DNA extraction process of these meat mixtures and products,
Real-Time PCR technique was used for the quantitative detection of meat species. SureFood Prep Animal DNA
extraction kit (Congen S 1003, Berlin, Germany) was used for the extraction of DNA from mixtures. PCR analyses were
carried out with Light Cycler-2 (Roche, Germany). According to the real-time PCR results, SureFood Animal QUANT
Beef and SureFood Animal QUANT Chicken kits were not able to detect the rates of meat species in meat mixtures (beef
and chicken) and meat products (salami, sausage and sucuk) accurately.
___
- Ayaz Y, Ayaz ND, Erol I, (2006). Detection of species in
meat and meat products using enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay. J Muscle Foods. 17, 214-220.
- Berger RG, Mageau RP, Schwab B, Johnston RW, (1988).
Detection of poultry and pork in cooked and canned meat
foods by enzyme linked immunosorbent assays. J AOAC
Int. 71, 406-409.
- Chikuni K, Tabata T, Kosugiyama M, Monma M, (1994).
Polymerase chain reaction assay for detection of sheep and
goat meats. Meat Scie. 37, 337-345.
- Chisholm J, Conyers C, Booth C, Lawley W, Hird H,
(2005). The detection of horse and donkey using real-time
PCR. Meat Scie. 70, 727-732.
- Chung ER, Kim YS, Han SK, (2000). Identification of
Hawoon meat using PCR-RFLP marker of MCIR gene associated
with bovine coat color. J Animal Sci Technol. 42,
379-380.
- Dooley JJ, Paine KE, Garrett SD, Brown HM, (2004).
Detection of meat species using TaqMan real-time PCR assays.
Meat Scie. 68, 431-438.
- Ganai TAS, Sing RK, Butchaiah G. (2000). DNA amplification
fingerprinting of cattle and buffalo genome by
RAPD-PCR utilizing arbitrary oligonucleotide primers.
Buffalo J. 3, 331-339.
- Girish PS, Anjaneyulu ASR, Viswas KN, Anand M,
Rajkumar N, Shivakumar BM, Et Al., (2004). Sequence
analysis of mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene can identify meat
species. Meat Sci. 66, 551-556.
- Guoli Z, Mingguang Z, Zhiang Z, Hongsheng O, Qiang
L, (1999). Establishment and application of a polymerase
chain reaction for the identification of beef. Meat Sci. 51,
233-236.
- Günşen U, Aydın A, Ovalı BB, Coşkun Y, (2006).
Detection of Different Meat Species in Raw Meat and
Cooked Meat Products Using ELISA Technique. J Vet Fac
Vet Med. Istanbul Univ. 32, 45-52.
- Hsieh YHP, Chen FC, Sheu SC, (1997). A. AES research
developing simple, inexpensive tests for meat products.,
Highlights of Agricultural Research, 44(2), Summer.
- Hsieh YHP, Johnson MA, Wetzstein CJ, Green NR,
(1996). Detection of species adulteration in pork products
using agar gel immunodiffusion and enzyme linked immunosobent
assay. J Food Quality. 19, 1-9.
- Hsieh YHP, Woodward BB, Ho SH, (1995). Detection of
species substitution in raw and cooked meats using immunoassays.
J Food Quality. 58, 555-559.
- Köppel R, Ruf J, Rentsch J, (2011). Multiplex real-time
PCR for the detection and quantification of DNA from beef,
pork, horse and sheep. Eur Food Res Technol. 232, 151-155.
- Kremar P, Rencova E, (2005). Quantitative Detection of
Species-Specific DNA in Feedstuffs and Fish Meal. Journal
of Food Protec. 68, 1217-1221.
- Lahiff S, Glennon M, Lyng J, Smith T, et al. (2001).
Real- time Polymerase chain reaction detection of bovine
DNA in meat and bone meal samples. J Agric Food Chem.
7, 1158-1165.
- Lombardo F, Galli A, Bongioni G, (2004). Real-Time
PCR Approach for Detection of Bovine DNA in Animal
Feedstuffs, Atti del 39 Simposio Internazionale di
Zootecnica “Meat scie and research”, 10 giugno Roma.
- Matsunga T, Chikuni K, Tanabe R, Muroya H, Shibata
K, Yamada J, Et Al. (1998). Determination of mitochondrial
cytocrome b gene sequence for red deer (Cercus elaphus)
and the differentiation of closely related deer meats.
Meat Sci. 49, 379-385.
- Necidova L, Recencova E, Svoboda L, (2002). Counter
immunoelectrophoresis: a simple method for detection of
species specific muscle proteins in heat processed products.
Vet Med Czech. 47, 143-147.
- Reddy PM, Reddy VSL, Rao ZS, Murthy GK, (2000).
Identification of origin of fresh,cooked, and decomposed
meats by using brain antigens. J Food Sci. Technol. 37,
201-203.
- Rencova F, Necidova L, Svoboda L, (2000). Identification
by ELISA of poultry, horse, kangaroo, and rat muscle specific
proteins in heat processed products. Vet Med Czech.
45, 353-356.
- Shericar AT, Karkare UD, Khot JB, Jayarao BM,
Bhilegaonkar KN, (1993). Studies on termostable antigens,
production of species specific antiadrenal sera and
comparison of immunological techniques in meat speciation.
Meat Sci. 33, 121-136.
- Soares S, Amaral JS, Mafra I, Oliveira MBPP, (2010).
Quantitative detection of poultry meat adulteration with
pork by a duplex PCR assay. Meat Sci. 85, 531-536.
- Tremlova B, (2000). Histologischer Nachweis von
Knochenpartikein in Fleischprodukten. Fleiswirtsch. 80,
73-74.