Lise Öğrencilerinin Başarı Hedef Yönelimlerindeki Derin Akış Farkı

Bu çalışma, lise öğrencilerinin akademik bağlamda akış deneyimleri ile başarı hedef yönelimleri arasındaki ilişkiyi belirlemeyi amaçlamaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Başarı Hedef Yönelimleri Ölçeği ve Akademik Bağlamda Akış Ölçeği geliştirilmiştir. Daha sonra öğrenme ve performans yaklaşma hedef yönelimleri ile akış deneyimi arasındaki ilişkiler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile test edilmiştir. Bu araştırmanın örneklemini Türkiye’de 14 farklı devlet lisesinde eğitimine devam eden 1916 öğrenci oluşturmaktadır. Sonuçlar öğrenme hedef yöneliminin akış deneyimini olumlu ve yüksek düzeyde yordadığını göstermiştir; ancak, performans yaklaşma hedef yönelimi ile akış deneyimi arasında bir ilişkibulunamamıştır. Sonuçlar literatür ışığında yorumlanmış ve ileride yapılacak araştırmalar için öneriler sunulmuştur.

The Profound Difference Concerning Flow in Achievement Orientations for High School Students

This study aims at determining the relationship between achievement goal orientations and flow experiences in the academic context for high school students. In line with this purpose, Achievement Goal Orientation Scale and Flow Scale in the Academic Context were developed. After-wards, the relationships between learning and performance-approach goal orientations and flow experience were tested by structural equation modelling. The sample of this study consisted of 1916 students continu-ing their education in fourteen different state high schools in Turkey. Results demonstrated that learning-goal orientation predicted flow experience positively and at a high level; however, there was no relation between performance-approach goal orientation and flow experience. The results were interpreted in the light of literature, and suggestions for future research were presented.

___

  • Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals structures and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261-271. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.84.3.261
  • Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260-267. doi: 10.1037/0022- 0663.80.3.26
  • Asakawa, K. (2004). Flow experience and autotelic personality in Japanese college students: How do they experience challenges in daily life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 5(2), 123-154. doi:10.1023/B:JOHS.0000035915.97836.89
  • Asakawa, K. (2010). Flow experience, culture, and well-being: How do autotelic Japanese college students feel, behave, and think in their daily lives? Journal of Happiness Studies, 11(2), 205-223. doi:10.1007/s10902-008-9132-3
  • Brown, T.A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2015). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı: İstatistik, araştırma deseni SPSS uygulamaları ve yorum. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
  • Carli, M., Delle Fave, A., & Massimini, F. (1988I). The quality of experience in the flow channels: Comparison of Italian and U.S. students. In M. Csikszentmihalyi, & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience (pp. 288–306). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper and Row.
  • Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040- 1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
  • Dweck, C. S., & Elliot, E. (1983). Achievement motivation. In P. Mussen, & E. M. Heatherington (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 643-691). New York: Wiley.
  • Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256-273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
  • Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The moderating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52(3), 412-430. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02090.x
  • Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218-232. doi:10.1037/0022- 3514.72.1.218
  • Elliott, E. S., & Dweck, C. S. (1988). Goals: An approach to motivation and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(1), 5-12. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.54.1.5
  • Elliot, A. J., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (1996). Approach and avoidance achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meditational analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70(3), 461-475. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.461
  • Elliot, A. J., & Moller, A. C. (2003). Performance-approach goals: good or bad forms of regulation? International Journal of Educational Research, 39(4-5), 339-356. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.003
  • Grant, H. (2000). Achievement goals and their impact: Intrinsic motivation and achievement across the college transition (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Columbia University, New York.
  • Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541-553. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.85.3.541
  • Heyman, G. D., & Dweck, C. S. (1992). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: Their relation and their role in adaptive motivation. Motivation and Emotion, 16(3), 231-247. doi:10.1007/BF00991653
  • Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
  • Huang, C. (2011). Achievement goals and achievement emotions: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review,23(3), 359-388. doi: 10.1007/s10648-011-9155-x
  • Jackson, S. A., & Eklund, R.C. (2004). The flow scales manual. Morgantown, WV: Fit-ness and Information Technology.
  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sorbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with SIMPLIS command language. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.
  • Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contributions and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19(2), 141-184. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5
  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practices of structural equation modelling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  • Lavigne, G. L., Forest, J., & Crevier-Braud, L. (2012). Passion at work and burnout: A two-study test of the mediating role of flow experiences. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21(4), 518-546.
  • Maehr, M. L., & Zusho, A. (2009). Achievement goal theory the past, present, and future. In K. R. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of Motivation at School (pp. 77-104). New York: Routledge.
  • Mayers, P. (1978). Flow in adolescence and its relation to school experience (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Chicago, Chicago.
  • Meece, J. L., & Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(4), 582-590. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.582
  • Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 432-447. doi:10.1037/a0014221
  • Nakamura, J. (1988). Optimal experience and the uses of talent. In M. Csikszentmihalyi, & I. Csikszentmihalyi (Eds.), Optimal experience (pp. 319-326). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
  • Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2002). Handbook of positive psycology. In C. R. Snyder, & S. J. Lopez (Eds.), The concept of flow (pp. 89-105). New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nakamura, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2009). Flow theory and research. In S. J. Lopez, & C. R. Snyder (Eds.), Oxford handbook of positive psychology (pp. 195-206). New York, NY, US: Oxford University Press.
  • Nicholls, J. G. (1984). Achievement motivation: Conceptions of ability, subjective experience, task choice, and performance. Psychological Review, 91(3), 328-346. doi:10.1037/0033- 295X.91.3.328
  • Pintrich, P. R., & Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice-Hall.
  • Rawsthorne, L. J., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Achievement goals and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analytic review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 326-344. doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_3
  • Spinath, B., & Steinmayr, R. (2012). The roles of competence beliefs and goal orientations for change in intrinsic motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1135-1148. doi:10.1037/a0028115
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics. USA: Pearson Education.
  • Wang, J. C. K., Liu, W. C., Lochbaum, M., & Stevenson, S. J. (2009). Sport ability beliefs, 2 x 2 achievement goals, and intrinsic motivation. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 80(2), 303-312.
  • Wolters, C. A. (2004). Advancing achievement goal theory: Using goal structures and goal orientations to predict students’ motivation, cognition, and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(2), 236-250. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.2.236
  • Yerdelen, S., Aydın, S., Yalmancı, S. B., & Göksu, V. (2014). Relationship between high school students’ achievement goal orientation and academic motivation for learning biology: A path analysis. Education and Science, 39(176), 437-446.