Farklı ülkelerin çevre eğitimi politikalarını karsılastırmaya yönelik bir durum çalısması

Birçok ülkede ve Türkiye'de çevre eğitiminin küresel ısınma kavramı ile ortaya çıktığı söylenebilir. Küresel ısınma ile birlikte çevre problemlerin dünya üzerindeki etkisi artmıstır. Bundan dolayı ülkeler kendi eğitim ve siyasi politikalarını çevre sorunlarının çözümü üzerine odaklamıslardır. Bu çalısmanın amacı; Fiji, Papua Yeni Gine, Hindistan, Umman ve Yunanistan gibi ülkelerin çevre eğitimi politikalarına etki eden faktörleri belirlemek ve Türkiye’nin çevre eğitimi politikasına etki eden faktörlerle karsılastırmaktır. Bu çalısmada doküman analizi kullanılmıstır. Bunun için de örneklemi olusturan ülkelerin çevre eğitimi politikaları ile ilgili genel tarama (literatür taraması) yapılmıstır. Elde edilen kaynaklar belirli bir norma göre düzenlenip, Türkçeye tercüme edildikten sonra çevre eğitimine etki eden ortak faktörler çıkarılmıstır. Bu bağlamda ülkelerin çevre eğitiminde etkili olan özellikler anlam çözümleme tablosu ve betimsel analiz yardımıyla açıklanmaya çalısılmıstır. Yapılan bu değerlendirmeler sonucunda, Türkiye ve Yunanistan'ın çevre eğitimi politikaları bakımından benzer özelliklerinin daha fazla olduğu sonucuna ulasılmıstır. Türkiye ile örneklemi olusturan diğer ülkelerin, çevre eğitimi politikaları açısından farklılıklar tasıdığı görülmüstür. Türkiye'nin çevre eğitimi politikasına en yakın ülke Yunanistan iken, en uzak ülkenin ise Papua Yeni Gine olduğu sonucuna varılmıstır.

A case study comparing environmental educational policies of different countries

It can be said that in Turkey as well as in a lot of countries environmental education has come out with the concept of global warming. Because the impact of the environmental problems increased on the world together with the global warming, countries focused their own educational and political policies on the solution of environmental problems. The aim of this study is to examine the environmental education policies of such countries in detail Fiji, Papua New Guinea, India, Greece and Turkey. Document analysis has been used in the present study. Environmental education literature of the sample countries has been reviewed. Firstly, such literature edited and translated into Turkish and finally, common factors that effect the environment education are stated. In this sense common and uncommon features which are effective in countries’ environmental education are tried to be explained with the help of analysis of the meaning of statements and descriptive analysis. The results of these evaluations show that environmental policies of Turkey and Greece have more similar characteristics. It is understood that there are differences between Turkey and the other countries that form the sample in terms of environmental education policy. In brief, it is concluded that the most similar country to the environmental policy of Turkey is Greece, whereas the most different one is Papua New Guinea.

___

  • Alachiotis, S. N. (2002). Flexible zones in schools. Epitheorissi Ekpaideftikon Thematon, 6, 5–14.
  • Al-Hashemi, J. (2003). Environmental knowledge level of education faculty students at Sultan Qaboos University and its relation with attitudes toward the environment. Unpublished Master’s thesis, College of Education, Sultan Qaboos University.
  • Al-Hatroushi, S. (2007). Environmental education in the basic education curricula of the Sultanate of Oman. Education Development Bulletin, 39, 30–34.
  • Ambusaidi, A. & Al-Rabaani, A. (2009). Environmental Education in Context, An International Perspective on the Development of Environmental Education, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, Boston, 39-50.
  • Anderson, T. (2004). Papua ,ew Guinea’s Bismarck Ramu Group: Redefining conservation and development (report for the Australian Conservation Foundation). Melbourne: Australian Conservation Foundation.
  • Arvanta, A. (2006). The necessity of knowledge and skills in environmental education: An investigational the training needs of secondary school teachers in the prefecture of Serres. Proceedings of the Second Conference on School Environmental Education Programs, Athens, 15–17 December , 76–85.
  • Athanasakis, A. & Kousouris, T. (1987). Ecological education and environmental training, Athens, Boukoumanis Publications.
  • Bismarck Ramu Group. (2003). Aims/objectives of BRG: BRG guidelines. Madang, Papua New Guinea, Author.
  • Çalık, M. (2009). Environmental Education in Context, An International Perspective on the Development of Environmental Education, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, Boston, 109-122.
  • Centre for Environment Education and Vikram A. Sarabhai Community Science Centre. (1986). Joy of learning: Handbook of science and environmental education activities, 1, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, Author.
  • Centre for Environment Education. (2007a). Samvardhan: Building cadres for sustainable development. Ahmedabad, Gujarat, Author.
  • Çepni, S. (2009). Arastırma ve Proje Çalısmalarına Giris. Celepler Matbaacılık 4. Baskı, Trabzon.
  • Chhokar, K. & Chandrasekharan, S. (2006). Approaches to environmental education for sustainability in India. In J. C.-K. Lee & M. Williams (Eds.), Environmental and geographical education for sustainability: Cultural contexts, New York: Nova Science. 297–308.eco-clubs, New Delhi, Author.
  • Erdoğan, M., Kostova, Z. & Marcinkowski, T. (2009). Components of environmental literacy in elementary science education curriculum in Bulgaria and Turkey, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education,5(1),15-26.
  • Farangitakis, G. & Spanou, M. (2006). Education for sustainability and environmental education in the greek educational system. Proceedings of the Second Conference on School Environmental Education Programs, Athens, 15–17 December, 730–738.
  • Fien, J. (2000). Listening to the voice of youth: implications for educational reform. In D. Yencken, J.
  • Fien, & H. Sykes (Eds.), Environment education and society in the Asia-Pacific: Local traditions and global discourses, London, Routledge, 251–275.
  • Fountain, S. (1999). Peace education in U,ICEF (working paper). New York: Education Section, Programme Division, UNICEF. Retrieved April 14, 2010, from http://www.unicef.org/french/ lifeskills/index_violence_peace.html
  • Goupos, T. (2005). The types of school environmental education programs supervised by teachers in primary and secondary education. Proceedings of the First Conference on School Environmental Education Programs, Isthmos Korinthou, 23–25 September, 107–114.
  • Goussia-Rizou, M. & Abeliotis, K. (2004). Environmental education in secondary schools in Greece:The viewpoints of the district heads of environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 35(3), 29–33.
  • Government of India. (1998). ,ational policy on education, 1986 (as modified in 1992). New Delhi: Department of Education and Ministry of Human Resource Development. Retrieved March 12, 2010,from http://education.nic.in/policy/npe86-mod92.pdf
  • Hardie, K. & Hale, M. (1993). Science and environmental education. In R. Hull (Ed.), ASE: Science teachers’ handbook, Hatfield, UK: The Association for Science Education, 308–325.
  • Huckle, J. (1999). Locating environmental education between modern capitalism and postmodern socialism: A reply to Lucie Sauvé. Canadian Journal of Environmental Education, 4(1), 36–45.
  • İleri, R. (1998). Çevre eğitimi ve katılımın sağlanması. Ekoloji Çevre Dergisi, 7(28), s. 3–9. Jackson, M. G. (2003). From practice to policy in environmental education. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 20, 97–110.
  • Karasar, N. (2005). Bilimsel Arastırma Yöntemi, Nobel Yayın Dağıtım Ltd. Sti. Ankara.
  • Kızılaslan, H. & Kızılaslan, N. (2005). Çevre konularında kırsal halkın bilinç düzeyi ve davranısları (Tokat İli Artova İlçesi Örneği), ZKÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Cilt 1, Sayı 1.
  • Knapp, D. (2000). The thessaloniki declaration: A wake-up call for environmental education? The Journal of Environmental Education, 31, 3, 32-39.
  • Live and Learn. (2008). Homepage. Retrieved May 20, 2010, from www.idea.org.au/liveandlearn country/fiji.asp
  • Loubser, C.P., Swanepoel, C. H. & Chacko, C.P.C. (2001). Concept formulation for environmental literacy, South African Journal of Education, 21 (4).
  • Manalis, P., Margariti, S., Sourbi, A., Platanistioti, S. & Makridis, G. (2005). The “time” factor in school environmental education programs. Proceedings of the First Conference on School Environmental Education Programs, Isthmos Korinthou, 23–25 September, 2005, 413–422.
  • Manalis, P., Margariti, S., Sourbi, A., Platanistioti, S. & Makridis, G. (2006). The quality of school environmental education programs and the importance of having trained teachers. Proceedings of the Second Conference on School Environmental Education Programs, Athens, 15–17 December , 2006, 430–441.
  • Mancl, K., Carr, K. & Morrone, M. (1999). Environmental Literacy of Ohio Adults, OHIO.
  • Manolas, E. I. (2009). Environmental Education in Context, An International Perspective on the Development of Environmental Education, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, Boston, 83-97.
  • Ministry of Environment and Forests. (2008). ,ational green corps: A programme of A programme of eco-clubs. New Delhi.
  • Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs. (2008). Structure of the education system. Retrieved July 18, 2008
  • Ministry of Education and Religious Affairs. (2008). Structure of the education system, from http://www.ypepth.gr/en_ec_page1531.htm, Retrieved July 19, 2010.
  • Ministry of Regional Municipalities, Environment, and Water Resources. (2005). The Oman environment over three decades, Muscat, Author.
  • Ministry of Regional Municipalities, Environment, and Water Resources. (2001). ,ational biodiversity strategy and action plan. Muscat: Author. National report on implementation of Agenda 21 on sustainable development. Muscat, Author.
  • Ministry of Regional Municipalities, Environment, and Water Resources. (2006). Oman International Conference on Eco-Tourism 26–28 February 2006. Muscat, Author.
  • National Department of Education. (2003a). Lower primary syllabus, environmental studies. Waigani, Papua New Guinea, Author.
  • National Department of Education. (2003b). ,ational curriculum statement for Papua ,ew Guinea. Waigani, Papua New Guinea, Author.
  • Nature Fiji. (2008). Homepage. Retrieved May 20, 2010, from http://www.naturefiji.org/ Ntarzanou, K. (2004). Environmental Education in Secondary Schools. Unpublished Bachelor’s dissertation, Department of Home Economics and Ecology, Charokopio University, Athens.
  • Pagelio, J. (2002). Theoretical perspectives on national identity. In Proceedings of the national seminar on promoting national identity through education, Waigani, Papua New Guinea, National Department of Education, 17-23.
  • Pande, A. (2001). Environmental education in rural central Himalayan schools. The Journal of Environmental Education, 32(33), 47–53.
  • Payne, P. (1995). Ontology and critical discourse of environmental education. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 11, 83–105. Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 2(1), 3–10.
  • Ryan, A. (2009). Environmental Education in Context, An International Perspective on the Development of Environmental Education, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, Boston, 9-17.
  • Sarabhai, K. V. (2005). It is not just “development” that needs to be redefined. In the final report of the international conference on DESD “Education for a Sustainable Future” Ahmedabad, India: Centre for Environment Education, 178–180.
  • Sarabhai, K.V. & Chhokar, K. B. (2009). Environmental Education in Context, An International Perspective on the Development of Environmental Education, 51-61, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, Boston.
  • Soran, H., Morgil, F.İ., Yücel, S., Atav, E. & Isık, S. (2000). Biyoloji öğrencilerinin çevre konularına olan ilgilerinin arastırılması ve kimya öğrencileri ile karsılastırılması, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18,128-139.
  • Spyropoulou, D., Antonakaki, T., Kontaxaki, S. & Bouras, S. (2007). The contribution of upper secondary education to the formation of environmental consciousness in students: Views and proposals by teachers. Epitheorissi Ekpaideftikon Thematon, 12, 69–85.
  • Srinivasan, U. (2005). ,ational Green Corps through the eyes of an evaluator. Retrieved, from http://www.devalt.org/newsletter/jun05/of_7.htm, July 29, 2010.
  • Strife, S. (2010). Reflecting on environmental education: Where is our place in the green movement? The Journal of Environmental Education, 41(3), 179–191.
  • Sungurtekin, S. (2001). Uygulamalı çevre eğitimi projesi kapsamında ana ve ilköğretim okullarında müzik yoluyla çevre eğitimi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 14(1).
  • Taylor, N., Doff, T., Jenkins, K. & Kennelly, J. (2007). Environmental knowledge and attitudes amongst a cohort of pre-service primary school teachers in Fiji. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 16(4), 367–379.
  • Taylor, N., Littledyke, M., Eames, C. & Coll, R. K. (2009). Environmental Education in Context, An International Perspective on the Development of Environmental Education, Sense Publıshers, Rotterdam, Boston.
  • Taylor, N., Taloga, K. & Tagivakatini, S. (2009). Environmental Education in Context, An International Perspective on the Development of Environmental Education, Sense Publishers, Rotterdam, Boston, 29-35.
  • Taylor, N. & Macpherson, C. (1993). Environmental education in Fiji. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 2(1), 3–10.
  • Uzun, N. & Sağlam, N. (2005). Sosyo-ekonomik durumun çevre bilinci ve çevre akademik basarısı üzerindeki etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29, 194-202.
  • Uzun, N. & Sağlam, N. (2007). Ortaöğretim öğrencilerinin çevreye yönelik bilgi ve tutumlarına “çevre ve insan” dersi ile gönüllü çevre kuruluslarının etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 33, 210-218.
  • Yılmaz, A., Morgil, İ., Aktuğ, P. & Göbekli, İ. (2002). Ortaöğretim ve üniversite öğrencilerinin çevre ve çevre kavramları ve sorunları konusundaki bilgileri ve önerileri, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 22, 156-162.